The Failure of Implementation Broadcasting Regulations in Indonesia-Malaysia Border Region: Case Study on Free-to-air Television in Meranti Regency, Riau Province - Indonesia
Abstract
Border residents in Meranti Regency still love Malaysian free to air television broadcasts. The broadcasting regulation stipulates that broadcasters must provide free to air access to foster a love of Indonesian television broadcasts and a spirit of nationalism for all levels of society. However, the reality in the field is inversely proportional. An important point that questioned in this research is how the implementation of broadcasting regulations governing equality of access to information and containers of cultural expression in free to air broadcasts for all Indonesian people, especially in border areas. This study aims to reveal the extent of the application of broadcasting regulations in the border region in the context of free to air broadcasts and cultural expression containers in free to air broadcasts. Social action media studies used as an analytical tool to reveal that access and broadcasting infrastructure are a necessity for reaching viewers. The program of the choice model is another analytical tool in uncovering the motives for selecting free to air broadcasts that are loved by border society. The case study method used to find data from the field of a single case that is the implementation of free to air broadcasting regulations in the Indonesian border region of Malaysia. As a result, broadcasting regulations are considered unsuccessful in the context of free to air in the border regions, and the expression of Malay culture has no place on Indonesian television, which in turn, the Malay cultural preference filled with free to air Malaysian broadcasts.
Keyword: Broadcasting, free-to-air, audience, border society, culture.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdussalam, S., & Wahyudi, M. (2016). Principles and strategies of a creative broadcasting program for Indonesian local TV: A descriptive study. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 603–627.
Andung, P. A., Sjuchro, D. W., Liliweri, A., & Hadisiwi, P. (2018a). Posisi media televisi dalam membangun nilainilai pada masyarakat perbatasan. Asosiasi Pendidikan Ilmu Komunikasi (ASPIKOM), 3(5), 917–931.
Andung, P. A., Sjuchro, D. W., Liliweri, A., & Hadisiwi, P. (2018b). Television as a symbolic culture: A media ethnography study of the border communities of Indonesia - Timor
Leste. Teorija in Praksa, 55(2), 328–344.
Awazu, M., Barakat, A. Y., Chevaller, R. L., & Ichikawa, I. (1989). The cause of uremia in obstructed kidneys. The Journal of Pediatrics, 114(2), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(89)80781-4
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10006
Brosius, H. B., Wober, M., & Weimann, G. (1992). The loyalty of television viewing: How consistent is TV viewing behaviour?. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159209364180
Bungin, B. (2011). Penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Kedua). Kencana.
Castelfranchi, C. (1998). Modelling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1–2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00056-3
Dahlan Abdul Ghani. (2015). Upin & Ipin: Promoting Malaysian culture values through animation. Historia y Comunicaciὀn Social, 20(1), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2015.v20.n1.49558
Denzin, N., & Giardina, M. (2010). Qualitative inquiry and human rights. Left Coast Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
Ellis, D. G., & Maoz, I. (2003). A communication and cultural codes approach to ethnonational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14(3/4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022901
Holmes, D. (2005). Communication theory media, technology and society. SAGE.
Jensen, K. B. (1990). Television futures: A social action methodology for studying Interpretivecommunities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360169
Juliana Abdul Wahab. (2010). Malaysian reality TV: Between myth and reality. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 26(2), 17–32.
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2012). Pedoman perilaku penyiaran (P3) dan standar program siaran (SPS) (p. 1–96). KPI Lembaga Negara Independen.
Kriyantono, R. (2008). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi. Kencana.
Littlejhon, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory. Sage.
Nur Kareelawati Abd Karim, & Ahmad Fadilah Ahmad. (2018). Religiopolitical and sociocultural factors shaping creative decisions in the production of British and Malaysian Islamic television. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(1), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3401-18
Nur Salawati Mohd Nadzri, & Hanita Hassan. (2013). The language identities of Malaysians as portrayed in Upin and Ipin. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 65(2), 109–114. https://sainshumanika.utm.my/index.php/sainshumanika/article/view/105
Morissan. (2019). The influence of the regulator on television content in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3504-14
Peiser, W., & Peter, J. (2000). Third-person perception of television-viewing behaviour. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02832.x
Prasojo, Z. H. (2013). Dinamika masyarakat lokal di perbatasan. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 21(2), 417-436. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 32 tahun 2002 - Tentang penyiaran. KPI Lembaga Negara Independen.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2005). Peraturan pemerintah no 11 Tahun 2005 - Tentang penyelenggaraan penyiaran lembanga penyiaran publik. KPI Lembaga Negara Independen.
Renckstorf, K., McQuail, D., & Jankowski, N. (1996). Media use as social action: A European approach to audience studies (Issue 15 of Acamedia research monographs). John Libbey Eurotext.
Schoening, G. T., & Anderson, J. A. (1995). Social action media studies: Foundational arguments and common premises. Communication Theory, 5(2), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00100.x
Setianto, Y. P. (2015). Media policy in the context of global media flows, the internet, and piracy: An historical analysis of media regulation in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 31(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkmjc-2015-3102-21
Setiawan, H. (2019). Memiilih diantara 7 tradisi ilmu komunikasi dalam kerangka filosofis. Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v11i1.447
Shugart, H. A. (2007). Crossing over: Hybridity and hegemony in the popular media. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 4(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/fkxrc9
Strangelove, M. (2015). POST-TV piracy, cord-cutting, and the future of television. University of Toronto Press.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Walsh, J. P. (2015). Border theatre and security spectacles: Surveillance, mobility and reality-based television. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 11(2), 201–221.
Webster, J. G., & Wakshlag, J. J. (1983). A theory of television program choice. Communication Research, 10(4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365083010004002
Wonneberger, A., Schoenbach, K., & van Meurs, L. (2009). Dynamics of individual television viewing behaviour: Models, empirical evidence, and a research program. Communication Studies, 60(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/cmw3fk
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study: Design and method. SAGE.
Yusuf, I. A. (2017). Radio di kawasan perbatasan Indonesia dalam centering the margin. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v12i2.469
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528