Public Participation Model for Public Information Disclosure

Dadi Ahmadi, Atie Rachmiatie, Nursyawal .

Abstract


Democratic governance is characterized by participation or community involvement in decision-making and implementation of public policy. Relating to community participation, the Indonesian government has a policy for citizens to access information they required. As the effect of  this policy, Indonesia has made efforts to implement the disclosure of information in accordance with the freedom of information act. This article aims to build model of public participation from the community to control the region government with case “Wakca Balaka Advocacy Forum” and “Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat (KIM)” in the context of public disclosure.  The method  used was case study and the data were collected through interviews and discussion forum with Wakca Balaka and observation on KIM activities in Bandung, Indonesia. The results of the research showed that Wakca Balaka Advocacy Forum is a bottom up public participation model, due to its own initiative to oversee various local government policies in its implementation. In addition, "KIM” is a "pseudo" public top down participation model, because it is formed and initiated by the government to manage information and empower the community. This makes KIM have a lower critical level in comparison with Wakca balaka in government transparency. For this reason, capacity building for information management officials in the local government and the Information Commission as regulators are needed, and so is building public awareness about the importance of public participation.

 

Keywords: Public participation, public information disclosure, information society group, advocacy forum, governance.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul, N., Mohd, H. &, Ishak, S., Geynna, N., & Awani, M. A. (2015). Empowering citizen media through investigative journalism in Malaysia (Memperkasakan media rakyat melalui kewartawanan penyiasatan di Malaysia). Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 31(2), 631–647. doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2015-3102-36

Ahmad, R. (2017). Dari parlemen ke ruang publik: Menggagas penyusunan kebijakan partisipatif. Jurnal Hukum Jentera, 2(2), 103–120. Retrieved from http://jurnal.jentera.ac.id/index.php/jentera/index

Aziz, M. (2010). Pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan dalam sistem peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5), 113–150.

Budi Setiyono. (2004). Birokrasi dalam perspektif politik dan administrasi (2nd ed.). Semarang: Puskodak Undip.

Creighton J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook, making better decisions through citizen involvement (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=QViwxZ1vQiIC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=THE+PUBLIC+PARTICIPATION+HANDBOOK&ots=vnY_KZJ3JO&sig=88xoGhQGRuJGH3THzeK4Hju7D30&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HANDBOOK&f=false

Fatah, R. E. S. (1994). Masalah dan prospek demokrasi di Indonesia Title (1st ed., M. Sudarsono, Juwono & Rauf, Ed.). Retrieved from https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002873486

Habermas, J. (2007). Ruang publik, sebuah kajian tentang kategori masyarakat Borjuis (2nd ed.; Y. Santoso, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Hidayat, D., Kuswarno, E., Zubair, F., & Hafiar, H. (2018). Public relations communication behavior through a local-wisdom approach: The findings of public relations components via ethnography as methodology. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 56–72. doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3403-04

Hidayat, D. N. (2002). Metodologi penelitian dalam sebuah “multi-paradigm science.” Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 3(2), 197–220. doi: 10.29313/MEDIATOR.V3I2.766

Iza, R. (2011). Relevansi partisipasi masyarakat dalam perancangan pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang responsif. Jurnal Simbur Cahaya, 16(2). Retrieved from http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/simburcahaya/issue/archive

Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together “public deliberation and political participation in America” (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Talking-Together-Deliberation-Political-Participation/dp/0226389871

Kamaruddin, A. (2017). Analisis kualitatif terhadap faktor kegagalan komunikasi pembujukan dalam konteks pengucapan awam. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 89–106.

Kominfo. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14.

Kominfo. (2010). Pedoman pengembangan dan pemberdayaan lembaga komunikasi sosial. Retrieved from Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia website: https://jdih.kominfo.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/254/t/peraturan+menteri+komunikasi+dan+informatika+nomor+08permkominfo062010+tanggal+01+juni+2010

Kominfo. (2017). Pemberdayaan KIM lahirkan masyarakat cerdas informasi. Retrieved December 9, 2017, from Sorotan Media website: https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/11882/pemberdayaan-kim-lahirkan-masyarakat-cerdas-informasi/0/sorotan_media

Komisi Informasi Daerah Jawa Barat. (2019). Hasil monitoring dan evaluasi penerapan keterbukaan informasi di Jawa Barat.

Komisi Informasi Pusat RI. (2018). Laporan implementasi keterbukaan informasi publik & penganugerahaan keterbukaan informasi badan publik tahun 2018 (hlm. 1–10). Retrieved from https://komisiinformasi.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Laporan-Penganugerahan-2018.pdf

Martin, C. D. P., Salvosa, F. I. F., Exevea, C. A. G., & Tome, P. C. (2018). Measuring the overall satisfaction of Filipino journalists on public information officers. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 168–185. doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3404-10

Mas’oed, M. (2003). Politik, birokrasi dan pembangunan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mulyana, D. (2001). Merancang peran baru humas dalam pengembangan otonomi daerah. MediaTor (Jurnal Komunikasi), 2(1), 1–9. doi: 10.29313/mediator.v2i1.693

Rachmiatie, A. (2001). Profil jurnalis di era Reformasi: Studi kualitatif dengan pendekatan sense making tentang profil sumber daya manusia di media cetak, radio, dan televisi. Mediator, 2(1), 101–114.

Safrudin, I. (2004). Etika emansipatoris Jurgen Habermas: Etika paradigmatik di wilayah Praksis. MediaTor (Jurnal Komunikasi), 5(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unisba.ac.id/index.php/mediator/article/view/1033

Schuler, D. (2010). Online deliberation and civic intelligence. Open government: Transparency, collaboration, and participation in practice, 91–103.

Subhan, A. (2016). Mendukung transparansi pemerintah (Studi kasus keterbukaan informasi publik di provinsi Jambi). Journal Kajian, 21(3), 237–255. doi: 10.22212/kajian.v21i3.777

Tim OGI (Open Government Indonesia). (2012). Laporan pelaksanaan rencana aksi 2016 (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2001/01/Indonesia_Mid-Term_Self-Assessment_2016-2017.pdf

Tjandra, W. R., & Darsono, K. B. (2009). Legislative drafting: Teori dan teknik pembuatan peraturan daerah Yogyakarta (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya.

Wahid, U. (2013). Perempuan dan kekuasaan politik dalam pemilukada DKI Jakarta tahun 2012. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malasysian Journal of Communication, 29(1), 73–97.

Wan Norshira Wan Mohd Ghazali. (2019). Islam as the state ideology: Exploring from Gramsci’s notion of power, culture and ideology. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 338–352. doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3501-22

Widiastuti, R. N. (2019). No Title. Kompas National Newspaper, p. 8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528