DVFx, and Modernization of Technology: Audience’s Changing Taste in the 21st Century

Hasrul Hashim

Abstract


The changes from analogue to digital in the film industry occurred rapidly and triggered a change in the landscape, especially in the usage of digital visual effects (DVFx). Thus, films that use the digital visual effects have developed a demand for technology exploitation among audiences. The most powerful effect afforded by digitization is the changes in the relationship between film and audience, especially in the aspect of cinema spectacle. Previously, the use of digital visual effects served merely to fix or modify damaged or negative elements in the post-production process, but it also has contributed to transformation of the tastes of audiences in 21st century cinemas. Tastes and aesthetic judgments are manifestations of aspects of class inequality and social, cultural and reproduction ideology. To evaluate tastes especially within different systems of society is not a simple matter as there has been a change in various aspects of society due to technological advances. This judgment involves complex processes and variables. This paper explored how globalization impacts audiences’ changing tastes with the juxtaposition of the digital visual effects revolution. The research used qualitative research methods, which is focus group discussions involving three groups of moviegoers from Malaysia, India and Australia. The analysis of the findings is divided into two main themes: modernization and technology. In general, the findings show that taste among movie audiences is a typical representation of the middle class society.

 

Keywords: Audience, digital visual effects, film studies, genres, technology.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baudry, J-L., & Williams, A. (1975). Ideological effects of the basic cinematographic apparatus. Film Quarterly, 28(2), 39–47.

Barker, M. (2012). Crossing out the audience. In I. Christie (Ed.), Audiences: Defining and researching screen entertainment reception (pp. 187–205). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bolin, G., & Skogerbo, E. (2013). Age, generation and the media. Northern Lights, 11, 3–14.

Christie, I. (Ed.). (2012). Audiences: Defining and researching screen entertainment reception. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Cover, R. (2006). Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media & Society, 8(1), 139–158.

Debenedetti, S., & Larceneux, F. (2011). ‘The taste of others’: Divergences in tastes between professional experts and ordinary consumers of movies in France. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 26, 71–88.

Dinur, E. (2017). The filmmaker’s guide to visual effects: The arts and techniques of VFX for directors, producers, editors and cinematographers. New York: Routledge.

Dixon, W. W., & Foster, G. A. (2011). 21st-century Hollywood: Movies in the era of transformation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Fleming, M. (2010). Arts in education and creativity: A literature review (2nd ed.). London: Creativity, Culture and Education

Felschow, L. (2015). Book review: Spectacular digital effects: CGI and contemporary cinema by Kristen Whissel. The Velvet Light Trap, 75, 114–115. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/567656

Fink, M., & Morie, J. F. (2014). Introduction. In J. A. Okun & S. Zwerman (Eds.), The VES handbook of visual effects: Industry standard VFX practices and procedures (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.

Fu, W. W. (2012). National audience tastes in Hollywood film genres: Cultural distance and linguistic affinity. Communication Research, 40(6), 789–817.

Fu, W. W., & Gorindaraju, A. (2010). Explaining global box-office tastes in Hollywood films: Homogenization of national audience movie selections. Communication Research, 37(2), 215–238.

Gans, H. (1966). Popular culture in America: Social problem in a mass society or social asset in a pluralist society? In H. Becker, (Ed.), Social problems: A modern approach (pp. 549–620). New York: John Wiley.

Gumpert, G., & Cathcart, R. (1985). Media grammars, generations and media gaps. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2(1), 23–53.

Halverson, E. R., Gibbons, D., Copeland, S., Andrews, A., Llorens, B. H., & Bass, M. B. (2014). What makes a youth-produced film good? The youth audience perspective. Learning Media and Technology, 39(3), 386–403.

Kredell, B. (2018). ‘Complicated negotiations’: Reception and audience studies into the digital age. In H. Vaughan & T. Conley (Eds.), The anthem handbook of screen theory (pp. 71–84). London: Anthem Press.

Lugg, A. (2011). Chinese online fiction: Taste publics, entertainment, and Candle in the Tomb. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(2), 121–136.

Mannheim, K. (1923). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Osorio, M. F. (2014). Movie audiences, modernity, and urban identities in Cali, Colombia, 1945–1980 (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from PQDTOpen. Proquest (3641826).

Rakhe, S. (2012). Techno creativity in advertising (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (3736032).

Rohlf, B. M. (2017). Audience reactions to computer-generated imagery in video (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (10603590).

Sefton-Green, J. (2000). Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people. New York: Routledge.

Srinivas, L. (1998). Active viewing: An ethnography of the Indian film audience. Visual Anthropology, 11, 323–353

Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. Boston: Ginn

Sundet, V. S. (2016). Still ‘Desperately seeking the audience’? Audience making in the age of media convergence. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook, 14(1), 11-27.

Warde, A. (2008). Dimensions of a social theory of taste. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(3), 321–336.

Wanderer, J. J. (1970). In defence of popular taste: Film ratings among professional and lay audiences. American Journal of Sociology, 76(2), 262–272.

Woodman, D., & Wyn, J. (2015). Class, gender and generation matter: Using the concept of social generation to study inequality and social change. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(10), 1402-1423


Refbacks



e-ISSN: 2289-1528