Government Social Media in Indonesia: Just Another Information Dissemination Tool

Ika Karlina Idris


Indonesia is the largest social media market in Southeast Asia with approximately 79 million active users. Since 2015, government agencies have been actively using social media as one of their communication channels. This study aims to analyse whether the advent of communication technologies of social media has made Indonesia government to perform a long-term two-way communication with the citizens. The social network analysis (SNA) method was used to analyse four types of government-citizens’ conversations on social media: daily communication, campaign communication, crisis, and emergency communication. Two Indonesian government agencies’ social media accounts at the national level were selected as samples. One was a policy-based government agency and the other was a service-based agency. This study found that a two-way communication happened in a limited way, which was mainly in the daily conversation. The policy-based agency used social media as a channel to disseminate information, thus they had a low number of interactions. Although the agency allows comments from every follower on Facebook page, there was no interaction between the agency and the public. The agency apparently was more active to reply messages via Twitter. The high number of fake followers and political buzzer on Twitter support the finding that the only interest for the agency to be on Twitter was to disseminate information. Lack of interaction happened in the campaign communication, also in crisis and emergency communication — types of communication that are urgent and important.


Keywords: SNA, Indonesia, government social media, symmetrical communication, interaction.

Full Text:



Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291-314. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050

Avery, E. J., & Graham, M. W. (2013). Political public relations and the promotion of participatory, transparent government through social media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7, 274–291.

Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from the left to right? Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?. Psychological Science.

Bastian M., Heymann S., & Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for Exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.

Bernays, E. L. (1955). Engineering of consent. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(6), 78-91.

Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79.

Chen, N. (2003). From propaganda to public relations: Evolutionary change in the Chinese government. Asian Journal of Communication, 13(2), 96-121.

Debatin, B. (2008). The Internet as a new platform for expressing opinions and as a new public sphere. In Wolfgang D., & Michael W. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Opinion Research (pp. 64-72). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.

DePaula. N., & Dincelli, E. (2016). An empirical analysis of local government social media communication: Models of e-government interactivity and public relations. Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research.

Golbeck, J. (2013). Analyzing the social web (1st ed.). Waltham: Morgan Kaufman.

Grunig, J. E. (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. Prism, 6(2). Retrieved from

Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1992). Models of public relations in communication. In J. E. Grunig & D. M. Dozier (Eds.), Excellence in public relations and communication management. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gruzd, A. (2016). Netlytic: Software for automated text and social network analysis. [Software]. Available at

Gruzd, A., & Haythronthwaite, C. (2011). Networking online: Cybercommunities. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Himelboim, I., Golan, G. J., Moon, B. B., & Suto, R. J. (2014). A social network approach to public relations on Twitter: Social mediators and mediated public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(4), 359-379. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2014.908724

Himelboim, I., Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., Espina, C. (2017). Classifying Twitter topic-networks using social network analysis. Social Media + Society. doi: 10.1177/2056305117691545

Istman, M.P. (2017, March 2). King Salman praises the work, work, work motto. Tempo, Retrieved from

Kapoor, K. (2017, December 7). Indonesia fights extraordinary diphtheria outbreak that has killed 32. Reuters. Retrieved from

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2016, November 15). Pemerintah canangkan gerakan masyarakat hidup sehat (GERMAS). Depkes. Retrieved from

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21–37. doi:

Lemhanas RI. (2018, September 8). Lemhanas turut aktif dalam tim SIMAN. Lemhanas RI. Retrieved from

Lips, M. (2012). E-government is dead: Long live public administration 2.0. Information Polity, 17, 239–250.

Lips, M. (2014). Transforming government—by default? In M. Graham & W. H. Dutton (Eds.), Society and the Internet: How networks of information and communications are changing our lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Magro, M. J. (2012). A review of social media use in e-government. Administrative Science, 2, 148-161.

Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp.11-25). London: Sage Publications.

Mergel, I. (2017). Social media communication modes in government. In Y. Chen., & Ahn. M. J. (Eds.), Routledge handbook on information technology in government. New York, NY: Routledge.

Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication network. New York: Oxford University Press.

Perkasa, A. (January 8, 2016). Ini 5 tugas tenaga humas. Bisnis Indonesia. Retrieved from

Sanders, K. (2009). Communicating politics in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2017). The spread of misinformation by social bots. arXiv: 1707.07592v3

Stacks, D. W., & Watson, M. L. (2006). Two-way communication based on quantitative research and measurement. In The future of excellence in public relations and communication management: Challenges for the next generation (pp. 67-83). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2011) Political public relations: Defining and mapping an emergent field. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations: Principles and applications (pp.1-32). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Sweetser, K. D. (2011). Digital political public relations. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

e-ISSN: 2289-1528