Analisis Keperluan Pembangunan Model Kurikulum Identiti Korporat Silang bagi Program Seni Reka Grafik (Needs Analysis for the Development of Cross-Cultural Corporate Identity Curriculum Model for Graphic Design Programme)

Nik Narimah Nik Abdullah, Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri, Muhammad Helmi Norman, Juritah Misman

Abstract


Analisis keperluan merupakan salah satu fasa terpenting pengumpulan data dan maklumat untuk di analisis secara sistematik bagi memberi input terhadap keperluan pembangunan sesebuah kurikulum yang mampan. Kajian ini dijalankan bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti keperluan untuk membangunkan model kurikulum identiti korporat silang budaya bagi Program Seni Reka Grafik di peringkat Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Fasa analisis keperluan ini, melibatkan kaedah temu bual separa berstruktur terhadap 12 orang peserta kajian yang terdiri daripada 10 orang pensyarah yang mengajar dalam Program Seni Reka Grafik di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi tempatan dan 2 orang pereka grafik yang berpengalaman dalam menghasilkan rekaan grafik di sektor awam. Data daripada temu bual bersama peserta kajian telah ditranskrip dan dianalisis secara tematik. Tiga tema utama yang telah dikenal pasti iaitu (1) rekaan bercirikan identiti budaya tempatan, (2) kurikulum berasaskan silang budaya dan (3) pengajaran dan pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan majoriti peserta kajian menyarankan agar model kurikulum identiti korporat silang budaya bagi Program Seni Reka Grafik dibangunkan. Menurut peserta kajian, keperluan silang budaya dalam bidang pendidikan seni reka grafik adalah untuk memberi ruang penerokaan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran bagi menghasilkan rekaan bercirikan identiti tempatan agar kelihatan unik dan kreatif. Dapatan kajian memberi indicator penting kepada kajian seterusnya yang melibatkan fasa pembangunan dan reka bentuk model kurikulum identity korporat berasaskan silang budaya dalam Program Seni Reka Grafik.

Kata kunci: Analisis keperluan;silang budaya; seni reka grafik; kurikulum; kreatif


Abstract


Needs analysis is one of the most important phases of data collection and information for systematic analysis to provide input on the developmental needs of a sustainable curriculum. The main objective of this study is to identify the need to develop a cross-cultural corporate identity curriculum model for the Graphic Arts Programme in higher learning institutions. The needs analysis phase of this curriculum model involved a semi-structured interview involving twelve study participants consisting of ten lecturers teaching the Graphic Arts Programme from the local higher institutions and two experienced graphic designers from the public sector. Data from the interviews was then transcribed and thematically analyzed.Three main themes were identified (1) design based on local cultural identity, (2) cross-cultural curriculum and (3) student-centered teaching and learning. The findings showed that the majority of the study participants recommended that a cross-cultural corporate identity curriculum model for the Graphic Arts Programme. The participants proposed that the cross-cultural need in the field of graphic arts education is to provide a space for exploration in teaching and learning in creating local-style designs which are unique and creative. Study findings presented essential indicators for future studies which involve the development and design phase of a sustainable crosscultural corporate identity curriculum model for the Graphic Arts Programme.

Keywords: Needs analysis; cross-cultural; graphic design; curriculum; creative


Full Text:

PDF

References


Austerlitz, D. N., Blythman, D. M., Jones, B. A., Jones Ann, C., Grove-White, A., Morgan, P. S. J., Orr, S., et al. 2008. Mind the gap: Expectations, ambiguity and pedagogy within art and design higher education. The Student Experience in Art and Design Higher Education: Drivers for Change 125-148.

Blair-early, A. 2010. Beyond borders: Participatory design research and the changing role of design. Global Interaction In Design. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Bocanegra-Valle, A. 2016. Needs analysis for curriculum design. The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (January): 560-576.

Chiang, W. S., Idris, M. Z. bin & Tan Wee Chuen. 2018. What makes an undergraduate graphic design education valuable? Journal of Education and Social Sciences 11(1): 73-82.

Drucker, J. 2016. Knowledge Design. The Journal of the Design Studies Forum 7075(February).

Dziobczenski, P. R. N., Person, O. & Meriläinen, S. 2018. Designing career paths in graphic design: A document analysis of job advertisements for graphic design positions in finland. Design Journal 21(3): 349-370.

Foroudi, P., Melewar, T. C. & Gupta, S. 2017. Corporate Logo: History, definition, and components. International Studies of Management and Organization 47(2):176-196.

Fraher, R. & Martinson, B. 2011. Process and pedagogy in undergraduate graphic design education. Design Journal 14(4): 390-412.

Gray, C. M. & Boling, E. 2017. Designers’ articulation and activation of instrumental design judgements in crosscultural user research. Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation: 191–211.

Grethe, A. & Pedersen, J. 2016. Corporate identity in a globalised world : A study of elements marking national identity on company websites 45: 28-45.

Hie, Yong Hie, Samsu, Ku Hasnita Ku, Adnan, Zatul Himmah, Awang, M. Daud & Halim, Adlina Ab. 2018. Peranan guru sebagai agen sosialisasi dalam membentuk perpaduan kaum di sekolah. Akademika 88(2): 95-108.

Ibrahim, A. 2016. Definition purpose and procedure of developmental research: An analytical review. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences 1(6): 1-6.

Lee, D. Y. & Bain, J. 2016. Developing a cross-cultural design methodology: A study of UK-South Korean collaboration in higher-education design. The Global Elearning Journal Volume 5(2):17-27.

Meyer, M. W. & Norman, D. 2020. Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 6(2): 13-49.

Motley, P. 2017. Critique and process: Signature pedagogies in the graphic design classroom. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 16(3): 229-240.

MQR. 2020. Program Seni Reka Grafik. https://www2. mqa.gov.my/mqr/akrResult.cfm.

Orr, S., and Shreeve, A. 2018. Art and design pedagogy in higher education: Knowledge, values and ambiguity in the creative curriculum.

Orr, S., Yorke, M. & Blair, B. 2014. The answer is brought about from within you: A student-centred perspective on pedagogy in art and design. International Journal of Art and Design Education 33(1): 32-45.

Ozkaynak, M. G. & Ust, S. 2012. New forms of design education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 51: 140-143.

Periasamy, M. S., Subramaniam, G. & Gruba, P. 2017. Nostalgic advertisements in multicultural Malaysia: A multimodal analysis. Akademika 87(April): 253-266.

Philip, L. 2018. Exploring the role of culture on graphic designs. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development Volume-2(Issue-3): 424-435.

Richey, R. C. & Klein, J. D. 2005. Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 16(2): 23–38.

Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D. & Nelson, W. A. 2004. Developmental research: Studies of instructional deisgn and development. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. 109-1130.

Rosli, Q. & Noor, A. Y. M. 2017. Pengajaran dan pembelajaran hadith di Darul ‘Ulūm Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūmuddīn Alor Setar, Kedah: Keberkesanan, metodologi dan persepsi pelajar. Akademika 87(3): 137-149.

Sahrir, M. S., Alias, N. A., Ismail, Z. & Osman, N. 2012. Employing design and development research (DDR) approaches in the design and development of online arabic vocabulary learning games prototype. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 11(2): 108-119.

Serezliev, S. 2017. Future of Design Education . The New Disruption : Graphic Design v / s Marketing (March 2005).

Spencer, J. 2016. Design Week30 John Spencer : “Universities aren ’ t the future of design education ”. Design Week. Retrieved from https://www.designweek. co.uk/issues/21-27-november-2016/john-spenceruniversities-arent-future-design-education/

Thiruvengadam, P. 2014. A Need For Needs Analysis. International Journal of Applied Research & Studies 6: 21-30.

Yang, C.-M. & Hsu, T.-F. 2017. New perspective on visual communication design education: An empirical study of applying narrative theory to graphic design courses. International Journal of Higher Education 6(2): 188.-198

Young, P. A. 2011. The culture based model. Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: 52-74.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694