Analisis Penilaian Iklim Keselamatan Pekerja Di Bahagian Operasi Sistem Pengangkutan Rel Bandar Malaysia (Analysis Of Worker Safety Climate Assessment At Malaysia City Rail Management’s Operation Division)

Kadir Arifin, Norfadillah Derahim, Kadaruddin Aiyub

Abstract


Tahap keselamatan dan kesihatan pekerjaan bagi sistem pengangkutan rel tidak boleh diabaikan disebabkan perkhidmatannya melibatkan pelbagai pihak berkepentingan terutamanya orang awam dan pekerja. Sehubungan dengan itu, konsep iklim keselamatan pekerja diperkenalkan sebagai alternatif baru bagi mengenal pasti sejauh mana keberkesanan usaha organisasi dalam mengurus isu ini dari sudut persepsi pekerja. Kajian ini dilaksanakan bagi menganalisis penilaian iklim keselamatan pekerja menerusi tiga konstruk utama iaitu iklim keselamatan organisasi, iklim keselamatan penyelia dan iklim keselamatan rakan sekerja serta hubungan di antaranya. Kajian menggunakan kaedah kuantitatif melalui instrumen soal selidik melibatkan sejumlah 226 pekerja di dua buah organisasi pengendali pengangkutan rel bagi kawasan Klang Valley/Greater KL. Ujian deskriptif dan ujian inferensi melalui penilaian Korelasi Pearson diaplikasikan dalam kajian ini. Hasil kajian mendapati bahawa iklim keselamatan pekerja adalah berada di tahap sederhana (min= 3.53). Konstruk iklim keselamatan penyelia merupakan konstruk yang berskor paling tinggi (min = 3.68) diikuti dengan iklim keselamatan rakan sekerja (min = 3.51) dan iklim keselamatan organisasi (min = 3.39). Ujian Korelasi Pearson menunjukkan kesemua konstruk mempunyai hubungan yang tinggi dan signifikan (r ≥ 0.537). Dapat disimpulkan bahawa ketiga-tiga figura iaitu organisasi, penyelia dan rakan sekerja mempunyai peranan penting dalam meningkatkan tahap iklim keselamatan pekerja. Hasil kajian boleh dijadikan panduan kepada organisasi bagi meningkatkan lagi kualiti keselamatan dan kesihatan pekerjaan terutamanya bagi organisasi pengendali sistem pengangkutan rel bandar di Malaysia.

                                                             

Kata kunci: iklim keselamatan; iklim keselamatan organisasi; iklim keselamatan penyelia; iklim keselamatan rakan sekerja,;pengangkutan rel bandar

 

Abstract

 

The occupational safety and health’s level of a rail transport system cannot be ignored because its service involves various stakeholders most importantly public and workers. Accordingly, the concept of worker safety climate was introduced as a new alternative to identify the effectiveness of organizational efforts in addressing these issues from the perspective of workers. This study was conducted to analyse the assessment of worker safety climate through three main constructs namely organisational safety climate, supervisor safety climate and co-worker safety climate and the relationships among them. This study utilised quantitative methods through questionnaires involving 226 workers at two rail transport operator organisations in the Klang Valley / Greater KL area. Descriptive tests and inference tests through Pearson Correlation Test were applied in this study. The results showed that the workers' safety climate was moderate (min = 3.53). Supervisor safety climate constructs were the highest rated (min = 3.68) followed by co-worker safety (min = 3.51) and organisational safety climate (min = 3.39). The Pearson Correlation Test showed that all constructs were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.537). It can be concluded that the three construct which is organisation, supervisor and co-worker plays an important role in improving the level of worker safety climate. The results of this study can serve as a guide for organisations to improve the quality of occupational safety and health especially for urban rail system operating organisations in Malaysia.

 

Keywords: safety climate, organisation safety climate, supervisor safety climate, co-worker safety climate, city rail transportation


Full Text:

PDF

References


Boyatzis, R. E. & Sala, F. 2004. Assessing emotional intelligence competencies. In The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence, Edited by Glenn Geher, 147-180. Hauppauge, NY: Novas Science Publisher.

Brondino, M., Silva, S. A. & Pasini, M. 2012. Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: Co-workers as the missing link. Safety Science 50: 1847-1856.

Chiaburu, D. S. & Harrison, D. A. 2008. Do peers make the place? conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(5): 1082- 1103.

Cooper, M. D. & Phillips, R. A. 2004. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research 35: 497-512.

Cox, S., Tomas, J. M., Cheyne, A. & Oliver, A. 1998. Safety culture: The prediction of commitment to safety in the manufacturing industry. British Journal of Management 9:3-1.

Dembe, A. E. 2009. Ethical issues relating to the health effects of long working hours. Journal of Business Ethics 84(2): 195-208.

Eisenberger, D. & Fink, O. 2017. Assessment of maintenance strategies for railway vehicles using Petri-nets. Transportation Research Procedia 27: 205-214.

Griffin, M. & Neal, A. 2000. Perceptions of safety at work : A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5(3): 347-35

Huang, Y., Ho, M., Smith, G. S. & Chen, P. Y. 2006. Safety climate and self-reported injury : Assessing the mediating role of employee safety control. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38: 425-433.

Jiang, L., Yu, G., Li, Y. & Li, F. 2010. Perceived colleagues’ safety knowledge / behavior and safety performance: Safety climate as a moderator in a multilevel study. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42(5): 1468-1476.

Kadir Arifin, Zitty Sarah Ismali, Mazhani Muhammad & Muhammad Lui Juhari. 2019. Analisis Keberkesanan Komunikasi dalam Meningkatkan Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan di Universiti Penyelidikan di Malaysia. Akademika. 89(3): 183-194.

Kadir Arifin, Roziah Abudin & Muhammad Rizal Razman. 2019. Penilaian iklim keselamatan persekitaran kerja terhadap komuniti kakitangan kerajaan di Putrajaya. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space GEOGRAFIA 15(4): 304-320.

Kadir Arifin, Kadaruddin Aiyub, Muhammad Rizal Razman, Zitty Sarah Ismail, Masdila Johari, Amirul Shazli Sahimi, Nik Raihan Nik Mansor & Mohd Hafiidz Jaafar. (2017a) Perception of safety culture among workers in research universities in Malaysia. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 15(3&4): 110-114.

Kadir Arifin, Roziah Abudin, Muhammad Rizal Razman & Zitty Sarah Ismail. (2017b). Safety of climate levels related to the safety management on empowerment dimension aspects. Information 20 (7A): 4935-4940.

Kadir Arifin, Roziah Abudin, Muhammad Rizal Razman, Zitty Sarah Ismail & Maisarah Ahmad. (2016). Safety climate assessment on priority, commitment and the efficiency of safety management. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 14(2): 142-146.

Kao, P., Pai, P. & Lin, T. 2015. How transformational leadership fuels employees’ service innovation behavior. The Service Industries Journal 35(7-8): 448-466

Kapp, E. A. 2012. The influence of supervisor leadership practices and perceived group safety climate on employee safety performance. Safety Science 50(4):1119- 1124.

Kines, P., Lappalainen, J., Mikkelsen, K. L., Olsen, E., Pousette, A., Tharaldsen, J. & Tómasson, K. 2011. Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 41(6): 634-646.

Kothari C.R. 2004. Research Methodology Methods & Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited

Lövétei, I. F., & Szabó, G. 2015. Safety modelling of centralized railway traffic control. Proceedings of 19th International Conference Transport Means: 294-297.

McFadden, A. 2015. The impact of co-workers on safety outcomes: Comparing models of mediation, moderation, and incremental effects. Ph.D Thesis, Graduate School, Clemson University of South Carolina

Mohd Hafiidz, Arifin, J. K., Aiyub, K., Razman, M. R., Samsurijan, M. S. & Syakir, M.I. 2017. Worksite element as causes of occupational accidents and illnesses in Malaysian residential construction industry. AIP Conference Proceedings 1885(1): 20-29

Mohd Nasir Selamat & Mukhiffun Mukapit. 2018. The Relationship between Task Factors and Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Performance in the Printing Industry. Akademika. 88(3): 65-76.

Nur Shazwanie Rosehan & Azlan Abas. 2019. Pencemaran Bunyi Bising Trafik di Bandar Batu Pahat, Johor. Akademika. 89(2): 97-109.

Oah, S., Na, R. & Moon, K. 2018. The influence of safety climate, safety leadership, workload, and accident experiences on risk perception: A study of Korean manufacturing workers. Safety and Health at Work 9(4): 427-433.

Palali, A. & van Ours, J. C. 2017. Workplace accidents and workplace safety: On under-reporting and temporary jobs. Labour 31(1): 1-14

Schein, E. H. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

Tucker, P., & Folkard, S. 2012. Working Time, Health and Safety: A Research Synthesis Paper. Geneva: ILO.

Tucker, S., Chmiel, N., Turner, N., Hershcovis, M. S. & Stride, C. B. 2008. Perceived organizational support for safety and employee safety voice: The mediating role of coworker support for safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 13(4): 319-330.

Turner, N., Chmiel, N., Hershcovis, M. S. & Walls, M. 2010. Life on the line: Job demands, perceived co-worker support for safety, and hazardous work events. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 15(4): 482-493.

Zitty Sarah Ismail, Kadir Arifin, Mazhani Muhammad & Mohammad Lui Juhari. 2019. Analisis keberkesanan komunikasi dalam meningkatkan keselamatan dan kesihatan pekerjaan di universiti penyelidikan di Malaysia. Akademika 89(3): 183-194

Zohar, D. 1980. Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and Applied implications . Journal of Applied Psychology 65(1): 96-102

Zohar, D. 2003. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(1): 75-92.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694