The paper is a critical discourse analysis of political discourse. It relies on van Dijk’s socio- cognitive approach which employs miscellaneous linguistic methodologies as input to support the interdisciplinarity of the socio- cognitive base. The paper adopts an eclectic model that combines pragmatic and semantic concepts as a methodology for the socio- cognitive approach. The pragma- semantic interface has always produced better holistic, integrated, and objective linguistic inference. The eclectic model combines Sabet & Zhang’s (2015) pragmatic functions of vague expressions (on the pragmatic level) and the semantic macrostructures and the semantic microstructures (on the semantic level). Wodak (2007) emphasises the vitality of the pragmatics in any critical discussion that analyses indirect and inferred linguistic techniques and biased utterances in order to identify and evaluate political discourse. Since vague expressions overlap sometimes in performing pragmatic functions, the pragmatic component of the eclectic model is further supported by the semantic concepts of semantic macrostructure and semantic microstructure. The data is collected from the White House Press Releases (issued in 2014 when ISIS took hold of major Iraqi cities) on Iraq. Such discourse is globally interesting and can shape public opinion about the critical events and realities in Iraq at that time. The analysis has proved the workability of the pragmatic- semantic integration and the paper has come up with a set of concluding remarks.

Keywords: critical discourse analysis; semantic macrostructure; semantic microstructure; van Dijk’s socio- cognitive; vagueness; White House Press Release

Andreas H. Jucker, Sara W. Smith & Tanja Lüdge. (2003). Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 35, 1737–1769.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Caffi, C. (2009) Mitigation. In Jacob L. Mey (Ed.). Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (pp. 645- 649). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.

Channel, I. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Donald R. Kinder & Lynn M. Sanders. (1990). Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative-Action for Blacks. Social

Cognition. Vol. 8 (1): 73-103.

Emanuel A. Schegloff, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language. Vol. 53 (2),

- 382.

Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In Teun A. van Dijk (Ed.). Discourse Studies (pp. 357-378). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Foucault, M. (1984). The History of Sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face- to- Face Behavior. New York: Anchor.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (Eds.). Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness. Vol. 9 (4), 179-197.

Khalil, H. H. (2019). The pragmatic functions of vague expressions in Hillary Clinton’s debating discourse on Iraq. Paper presented at The 18th International

Conference on Social Sciences. Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa, May.

Khalil, H. H. (2020). The Construction of Time, Place and Society in 21st Century American Dystopia Fiction: A Corpus Linguistics Analysis of Deixis. 3L: The Southeast

Asian Journal of English Language Studies .Vol. 26(2), 139 – 157. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2602-11

Nadernia, V. (2018). Transrealism: In Pursuit of Social Change and Collective Justice in Huxley's Brave New World. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English

Language Studies .Vol. 24(2), 71 – 81. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2402-06

Prince, E. F., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In Robert J. Di Pietro (Ed.). Linguistics and the Professions (pp. 83-97).

Norwood: Ablex.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Raffman, D. (2014). Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Abdul Rahim, H. (2020). The Discourse of Nation Building in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Malaysia Info Web Portal News Articles. 3L: The Southeast Asian

Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 26(1), 119 – 134. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2601-09

Sabet, P. G. P. & Zhang, G. Q. (2015). Communicating through Vague Language: A Comparative Study of L1 and L2 Speakers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Stubbs, M. (1986). A matter of prolonged fieldwork: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 7 (1), 1–25.

Taboada, M. (2006). Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn- taking. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 16, 329-360.

van Deemter, K. (2010). Not Exactly: in Praise of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van Dijk T. (1988). News as Discourse. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

van Dijk, T. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society. Vol. 4(2), 249-283.

van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In Christina Schäffne & ‎Anita L. Wenden (Eds.). Language and Peace (pp.17- 33). Dartmouth:

Aldershot.

van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 95-119). London:

Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political discourse and political cognition. In Paul Anthony Chilton & ‎Christina Schäffner (Eds.). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches

to Political Discourse (pp. 203-237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: a sociocognitive approach. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 62-

. London: Sage.

Waugh, L. R., Catalano, T., Al Masaeed, K., Hong Do, T., & Renigar, P. G. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: Definition, approaches, relation to pragmatics, critique,

and trends. In Alessandro Capone & ‎Jacob L. Mey (Eds.). Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society (pp. 71-136). New York: Springer.

Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. In Robert J. Asher & Joseph R. Simpson (Eds.). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 4869–4871). Oxford: Pergamon

Press.

Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition. Vol. 15(1), 203-225. DOI: 10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/06/13/statement-president-iraq. Retrieved on June 10, 2019.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/photos-and-video/video/2014/06/13/president-obama-makes-statement-iraq#transcript. Retrieved on June 10, 2019.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/photos-and-video/video/2014/06/19/president-obama-speaks-situation-iraq. Retrieved on June 10, 2019.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/photos-and-video/video/2014/08/09/president-obama-gives-update-situation-iraq. Retrieved on June 10, 2019.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/photos-and-video/video/2014/08/11/president-obama-discusses-latest-developments-iraq. Retrieved on June 10, 2019.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/photos-and-video/video/2014/08/18/president-speaks-iraq-and-ferguson. Retrieved on June 10, 2019.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/photos-and-video/video/2014/08/28/president-obama-delivers-statement-economy-iraq-and-ukraine. Retrieved on June 10,

https://www.cnbc.com/2014/08/29/president-obama-on-isis-we-dont-have-a-strategy-yet.html. Retrieved on June 10, 2019.