Abstracts are an essential part of research articles (RAs) because they are the readers’ first encounter in their search for relevant literature. Writing an effective abstract in English which can “sell” the article to a wider circle of readers is therefore important to novice writers, especially multilingual ones. Based on the corpus of 584 English abstracts of Thai empirical RAs published by six Rajabhat (teacher-training) university journals which are indexed in the Thai-journal citation index center (TCI), this study aims to explore not only their rhetorical structures but also the grammatical and interactional metadiscourse features. The results show that there were three types of abstracts (Informative, Indicative and Combinatory) and the absence of certain moves in a large number of abstracts of each type. Moreover, this abstract corpus had a few instances of move embedding, a complete absence of move cycles and the existence of abstracts with several paragraphs. Regarding the linguistic features, there was a prominent presence of active voice, future tense and the sparing use of interactional meta-discourse devices across the moves. These findings tend to indicate a need for journal editors and novice writers, especially those from non-English backgrounds to be informed about the characteristics of good RA abstracts in English (i.e., rhetorically and linguistically) and an increased amount of form-based instruction in academic courses to address the linguistic deficiencies of new multilingual writers.  

Keywords: abstracts; Thai writers; Thai university journals; rhetorical structures; linguistic features

Bennui, P. (2008). A study of L1 interference in the writing of Thai EFL students. Malaysian Journal Of ELT Research. 4, 72-102.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.

Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001

Cooley, L. & Lewkowicz, J. (2003). Dissertation writing in practice: Turning ideas into text. Hongkong: Hongkong University Press.

Gillaerts, P. & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9(2), 128-139. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004

Graetz, N. (1985). Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In J. M. Ullign & A. K. Pugh (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes: Methods and materials in teaching langauges (pp.

-135). London: Heinemann Educational Publishers.

Hinnon, A. (2014). Common errors in English writing and suggested solutions of Thai university students. มนุษยศาสตร์ สังคมศาสตร์. 31(2), 165-180.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. London: Longman Pearson Education.

Hyland, K. (2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 54(3), 251-259.

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 7(2), 173-192 doi:10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics. 25(2), 156-177.

Jaroongkhongdach, W., Watson Todd, R., Keyuravong, S. & Hall, D. (2012). Differences in quality between Thai and international research articles in ELT. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11(3), 194-209. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.006

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes. 24(3), 269-292. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Kiatkheeree, P. (2016). Rise or fall of the EFL teaching profession in Thai universities. In P. Harworth & C. Craig (Eds.), The career trajectories of English language teachers (Vol. 26, pp. 173-184). United Kingdom: Symposium Books Ltd.

Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes. 23(3), 280-302. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001

Martı́n, P. M. n. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes. 22(1), 25-43. doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(01)00033-3

Nguyen, T. T. L., Li, Q., Nguyen, D. L. & Pramoolsook, I. (2014). TESOL conference abstracts: Discrepancies between potential writers’ knowledge and actual composition. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 20(3), 161-176.

OHEC, O. o. t. H. E. C. (2014). Manual for the Internal quality assurance for higher education institutions: Office of the higher education Commission (OHEC). Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Education Retrieved

from http://www.mua.go.th/users/bhes/bhes2/56-12-

%20Manual%20for%20the%20Internal%20Final.pdf.

Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realisations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies. 10(2), 231-250. doi:10.1177/1461445607087010

Phothongsunan, S. (2016). Thai university academics’ challenges of writing for publication in English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 681-685. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0604.04

Phuket, P. R. N. & Othman, N. B. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(32), 99-106.

Safnil, A. (2014). The discourse structure and linguistic features of

research article abstracts in English by Indonesian academics. The Asian ESP Journal. 10(2), 191-223.

Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 24(2), 141-156. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001

Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organisation of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text. 16(4), 481- 499.

Sombatsompop, N., Chancheewa, S., Markpin, T., Premkamolnetr, N., Ittiritmeechai, S., Wongkaew, C., . . . Ratchatahirun, P. (2012). Thai journal citation index (TCI) centre: 10 years of experiences, lessons learned, and ongoing development. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 17(3), 17-33.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

TCI. (2008). TCI. Retrieved from

http://www.kmutt.ac.th/jif/public_html/index.html

Thep-Ackrapong, T. (2005). Teaching English in Thailand: An uphill battle. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 27(1), 51-62.

Vathanalaoha, K. & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Genre analysis of experiment-based dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 24(3), 1-14.

Ventola, E. (1994). Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. In S. Cmejrkova, F. Dane, & E. Havlova (Eds.), Writing vs. Speaking:

Language, text, discourse, communication (pp. 333-352). Gunter Narr: Tubingen.