Media Independence in Indonesian Broadcast Television News: A Comparative Case Study of iNews TV and Metro TV during the 2024 Presidential Election
Abstract
This research investigates Indonesian broadcast television news media's independence in the 2024 Presidential Election, focusing specifically on iNews TV and Metro TV. The study is driven by the media's critical role in shaping public opinion and the integrity of democratic processes, particularly during electoral periods. Through qualitative comparative case study with interview and literature review as data collection methods, this research examines how these two prominent news outlets maintain neutrality and impartiality in their reporting on election-related issues. The findings reveal significant differences in the editorial approaches of iNews and Metro TV, which appear to be influenced by their respective ownership structures and political affiliations. iNews, linked to media conglomerates close to specific political figures, shows a distinct bias in framing news stories, favouring certain candidates. Conversely, with its political affiliations, Metro TV exhibits a different pattern of bias, though equally impactful on audience perceptions. This study underscores the challenges faced by Indonesian media in maintaining editorial independence in a highly polarized political environment. It also highlights the implications of biased media coverage for public trust in the media and the overall democratic process. The research contributes to the broader discourse on media independence in Indonesia, calling for stronger regulatory frameworks to ensure that broadcast media serve the public interest with fairness and impartiality, particularly during critical electoral events.
Keywords: Media independence, Metro TV, iNews TV, Indonesian television, Presidential Election 2024.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting semi‐structured interviews. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492–505). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
Ahmad, N. (2022). The four faces of authoritarian populism and their consequences on journalistic freedom: A lesson learnt from Indonesia’s 2019 Presidential Election. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 10(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2021.16
Akil, M. A. (2014). Regulasi media di Indonesia (Tinjauan UU Pers dan UU Penyiaran). Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 15(2), 137–145.
Allsop, J. (2025). What Is Journalism for? Policy Press.
Amin, I., & Rizky, F. (2023, January 21). PDIP Adukan Media Indonesia dan Metro TV ke Dewan Pers. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/pdip-adukan-media-indonesia-dan-metro-tv-ke-dewan-pers-gBoE
Arifuddin, M. T. (2017). Why political parties colonize the media in Indonesia: An Exploration of mediatization. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 20(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/j4gr
Aulia, D. (2016). Penguatan demokrasi: Partai politik dan (sistem) pemilu sebagai pilar demokrasi. Masyarakat Indonesia, 42(1), 115–126.
Bennett, J. (2014). Introduction: The utopia of independent media: Independence, working with freedom and working for free. In J. Bennett & N. Strange (Eds.), Media Independence: Working with Freedom or Working for Free? (pp. 1-28). Routledge.
Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22.
Budiana, M. (2024). Political buzzers’ role on social media during the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(2), 521-32.
Calice, M. N., Bao, L., Freiling, I., Howell, E., Xenos, M. A., Yang, S., Brossard, D., Newman, T. P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2023). Polarized platforms? How partisanship shapes perceptions of “algorithmic news bias.” New Media & Society, 25(11), 2833–2854.
Dahlia, R. R., & Permana, P. A. (2022). Oligarki media dalam pusaran pemilihan presiden dan wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia 2019 menuju 2024. POLITICOS: Jurnal Politik dan Pemerintahan, 2(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.22225/politicos.2.1.2022.65-81
Davis, N. T., & Dunaway, J. L. (2016). Party polarization, media choice, and mass partisan-ideological sorting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 272–297. https://doi.org/ghhzcq
De Angelis, A., & Vecchiato, A. (2024). Panem et circenses: Removing political news to generate electoral support, evidence from Berlusconi’s Italy. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2023.32
Dragomir, M. (2018). Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line. Journalism, 19(8), 1131–1148. https://doi.org/gd5gw4
Ekayanti, M., & Xiaoming, H. (2018). Journalism and political affiliation of the media: Influence of ownership on Indonesian newspapers. Journalism, 19(9–10), 1326–1343.
El Issawi, F. (2021). Media pluralism and democratic consolidation: A recipe for success? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(4), 861–881. https://doi.org/gkjk8w
Fahadi, P. R. (2019). Oligarchic media ownership and polarized television coverage in Indonesia’s 2014 Presidential Election. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 4(2), 77-86
Grossman, G., Margalit, Y., & Mitts, T. (2022). How the Ultrarich use media ownership as a political investment. The Journal of Politics, 84(4), 1913–1931. https://doi.org/p7sb
Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2018, August). How ideology, economics and institutions shape affective polarization in democratic polities. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association.
Guess, A. M., Barberá, P., Munzert, S., & Yang, J. (2021). The consequences of online partisan media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), e2013464118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013464118
Hanretty, C. (2014). Media outlets and their moguls: Why concentrated individual or family ownership is bad for editorial independence. European Journal of Communication, 29(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114523150
Hijriani, H., & Nur, M. N. A. (2024). Kebebasan pers, tanggung jawab dan etika jurnalistik dalam lingkungan media online yang kompetitif. Diponegoro University.
Iannone, A. (2022). Democracy crisis in South-East Asia: Media control, censorship, and disinformation during the 2019 Presidential and General Elections in Indonesia, Thailand and 2019 Local Election in the Philippines. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 26(1), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.71417
Ida, L. (2014). Election and political evil ambition in Indonesia’s reformasi era. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance, 5(5.4), 1-24.
Indriani. (2014, July 9). KPI tegur Metro TV terkait tayangan umrah Jokowi. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/443236/kpi-tegur-metro-tv-terkait-tayangan-umrah-jokowi
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/gfv79s
Jackson, P. T., & Stanfield, J. R. (2004). The role of the press in a democracy: Heterodox economics and the propaganda model. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(2), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2004.11506708
Kakiailatu, T. (2007). Media in Indonesia: Forum for political change and critical assessment. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(1), 60-71.
Karppinen, K., & Moe, H. (2016). What we talk about when talk about “media independence”. Javnost-The Public, 23(2), 105-119.
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia (KPI). (2014). Melanggar ketentuan siaran pilpres di masa tenang, KPI kecam Metro TV, RCTI, MNC dan Global TV. https://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/siaran-pers/32188-melanggar-ketentuan-siaran-pilpres-di-masa-tenang-kpi-kecam-metro-tv-rcti-mnc-dan-global-tv?detail5=23720&detail3=23920
Levendusky, M. (2013). Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication, 30(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/cvm5
Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/cv22
Loosen, W., Reimer, J., & Hölig, S. (2020). What journalists want and what they ought to do (in)congruences between journalists’ role conceptions and audiences’ expectations. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1744–1774. https://doi.org/ghfssp
Lowrey, W., & Erzikova, E. (2018). Russia’s Regional media paths to independence and financial survival. In E. Freedman, R. S. Goodman, & Steyn. Elanie (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Journalistic Beliefs and Actions (1st ed.). Routledge.
Mansell, R. (2004). Political economy, power and new media. New Media & Society, 6(1), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804039910
Masduki. (2017). Media and politics: Re-thinking the Indonesian broadcasting system. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 21(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.28680
Masduki, & d'Haenens, L. (2022). Concentration of media ownership in Indonesia: A setback for viewpoint diversity. International Journal of Communication, 16, 2239-2259.
Maulana, A., & Situngkir, H. (2020). Media partisanship during election: Indonesian cases. In Benito, R. M., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Moro, E., Rocha, L. M., & Sales-Pardo, M. (Eds.), Complex Networks & Their Applications IX (pp. 651–659). Complex Networks 2020. Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 943). Springer. https://doi.org/p7sc
McIntosh, M. J., & Janice, M. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2. https://doi.org/gcd246
MetroTV. (2023, Oct 19). Elman Saragih: Sikap Pasangan AMIN dan Gama Tunjukkan Politik Tanpa Drama. Medcom.id. https://www.medcom.id/pemilu/news-pemilu/GNlPxLgN-elman-saragih-sikap-pasangan-amin-dan-gama-tunjukkan-politik-tanpa-drama
Michailidou, A., & Trenz, H.-J. (2021). Rethinking journalism standards in the era of post-truth politics: From truth keepers to truth mediators. Media, Culture & Society, 43(7), 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211040669
Mietzner, M. (2024). The limits of autocratisation in Indonesia: power dispersal and elite competition in a compromised democracy. Third World Quarterly, 46(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2024.2317970
Morris, D. S., & Morris, J. S. (2022). Partisan media exposure, polarization, and candidate evaluations in the 2016 general election. Social Science Quarterly, 103(5), 1101–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13182
Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication (2nd Edition). SAGE Publishing.
Moyo, D. (2021). Philanthropy-funded journalism: Implications for media independence and editorial credibility in South Africa. In H. S. Dunn, D. Moyo, W. O. Lesitaokana & S. B. Barnabas (Eds.), Re-imagining Communication in Africa and the Caribbean (pp. 193–216). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54169-9_11
Mukhtar, S., Ali, A., Saleem, N., & Hanan, M. A. (2016). Role of media in strengthening democracy in Pakistan: Journalists’ perception. South Asian Studies, 31(1), 331-345.
Muqsith, M. A., Muzykant, V. L., & Kuzmenkova, K. E. (2019). Cyberprotest: New media and the new social movement in Indonesia. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 24(4), 765-775. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2019-24-4-765-775
Muqsith, M. A., Pratomo, R. R., & Muzykant, V. L. (2024). Indonesian agenda: Fake news about Russia’s special military operation on social media in Indonesia. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 24(2), 239-251.
Mutiah, Andarini, R. S., Karmila, L., & William, R. (2025, February 28). Media bias in the coverage of the third debate of the 2024 presidential candidates. Journal Commedies, 2(01), 29–33. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/commedies/article/view/39080
Nainggolan, B. (2018). Market typology, concentration, and competition of national media conglomerate in Indonesia. Communication Journal of Indonesian Association of Communications Scholars, 2(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v2i1.89
Noam, E. (2018). Beyond the mogul: From media conglomerates to portfolio media. Journalism, 19(8), 1096–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917725941
Nyarko, J., & Teer-Tomaselli, R. E. (2018). The interface between media funding and agenda setting: The conduit for media independence. Journal of Creative Communications, 13(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258617743620
Ojala, M. (2021). Is the age of impartial journalism over? The neutrality principle and audience (dis)trust in mainstream news. Journalism Studies, 22(15), 2042–2060. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1942150
Okolie, A.-M., Enyiazu, C., & Nnamani, K. E. (2021). Campaign propaganda, electoral outcome and the dynamics of governance in the post-2015 presidential election in Nigeria. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1922180
Okon, P. E. (2018). Political party affiliation of media owners and objectivity in reporting: A case study of Sun and Nation Newspapers. Journal of Media Practice and Research, 3(2), 43–60.
Park, C. S., & Zúñiga, H. G. de. (2021). Learning about politics from mass media and social media: Moderating roles of press freedom and public service broadcasting in 11 countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa021
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
Punch, K. (2014). Introduction to Social Research (3rd edition). SAGE Publishing.
Raza, M. R., Saeed, M. U., & Ali, Z. (2022). Media concentration and journalistic independence in pakistan audience and journalists’ perspectives. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(1), e202205. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/11462
Reyes, V., Bogumil, E., & Welch, L. E. (2024). The living codebook: Documenting the process of qualitative data analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120986185
Rg. (2019, February 20). Metro TV dan Grup MNC klarifikasi keberimbangan dan netralitas siaran. Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. https://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/umum/38-dalam-negeri/34989-metro-tv-dan-grup-mnc-klarifikasi-keberimbangan-dan-netralitas-siaran
Rožukalne, A. (2013). Editorial independence in the Latvian news media: Ownership interests and journalistic compromises. Media Transformations, 9, 80-101.
Priyanto, A. R., & Ghofur, A. (2024). Digital conglomerates and their political behavior: a study on the affiliation of MNC Group owner Hary Tanoesoedibjo towards the Presidential candidacy of Ganjar Pranowo in the 2024 General Election. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(3), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.332
Saad, S., & Sannusi, S. N. (2023). Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-15 (PRU15): Analisis bias media portal berita dalam talian di Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 2023.
Searles, K., Smith, G., & Sui, M. (2018). Partisan media, electoral predictions, and wishful thinking. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 888–910. https://doi.org/gjjsfp
Setiawan, B., Pawito, P., Hastjarjo, S., & Saputro, E. P. N. (2024). Media ownership and its role in shaping news: Analysing Republika's 1999 and 2021 coverage in light of the 2024 Gaza genocide. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(3), 281-296.
Silitonga, A. M., & Muqsith, M. A. (2023). Independence and neutrality journalists ahead 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election in perspective media conglomerates. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(7), 4158-4169.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/ggcpgx
Sparks, C. (1995). The media as a power for democracy. Javnost - The Public, 2(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.1995.11008585
Stetka, V. (2012). From multinationals to business tycoons. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212452449
Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2017). Political public relations and mediatization: The strategies of news management. In P. Van Aelst & S. Walgrave (Eds.), How Political Actors Use the Media (pp. 63–83). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/p7sq
Sukmayadi, V. (2019). The dynamics of media landscape and media policy in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 29(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X19844853
Tapsell, R. (2015). Indonesia’s media oligarchy and the “Jokowi Phenomenon”. Indonesia, 99, 29–50. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.99.0029
Tapsell, R. (2017). Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens and the Digital Revolution. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.
Tasya. (2023, November 16). Peneliti UGM beberkan kecenderungan media bahas tiga Capres jelang Pemilu 2024. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/peneliti-ugm-beberkan-kecenderungan-media-bahas-tiga-capres-jelang-pemilu-2024/
Tremayne, M. (2015). Partisan media and political poll coverage. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(3), 270–284. https://doi.org/p7sg
Udris, L., & Lucht, J. (2014). Mediatization at the structural level: Independence from politics, dependence on the market. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (pp. 114-136). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844_7
Urbániková, M. (2024). The anatomy of internal interference in public service media: How do journalists interpret whether editorial interference constitutes unacceptable encroachment on their autonomy? Journalism, 26(6), 1251-1269. https://doi.org/p7sf
Van Spanje, J., & Azrout, R. (2019). Tainted love: How stigmatization of a political party in news media reduces its electoral support. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy009
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005
Wittel, A. (2016). Digital Marx: Toward a political economy of distributed media. In C Fuchs & V. Mosco (Eds.), Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism (pp. 68–104). Studies in Critical Social Sciences (Vol. 80). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291393_004
Young, J. C., Rose, D. C., Mumby, H. S., Benitez‐Capistros, F., Derrick, C. J., Finch, T., Garcia, C., Home, C., … & Mukherjee, N. (2018). A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12828
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528