Portrait of Hate Speech Propagators' Behaviour in Indonesia Twittersphere: A Comparative Virtual Ethnography Study

Suwandi Sumartias, Dwia Aries Tina Pulubuhu, Elfitra ., Eny Ratnasari

Abstract


Political life in Indonesia today cannot be separated from the social media platform  Twitter (X) because it is often used to express opinions freely. Unfortunately, a handful of parties misused the freedom of communication and expression offered by Twitter (X) to spread hate speech. One of the biggest phenomena is “Cebong” and “Kadrun”. This research examines  the characteristics of hate speech spreaders in the political context of "Cebong" and "Kadrun". This study employed virtual ethnography to interpret the phenomenon of political hate speech on Twitter (X) in May 2022. The hate speech made by "Cebong" and "Kadrun" can be concluded as two hostile political camps. They argued with each other to show their identity as supporters of one of the camps and aimed to bring down the opposing political camp. The tweets made by “Cebong” were dominated by arguments classified as arguments by analogy; meanwhile, "Kadrun" was dominated by discovery arguments: arguments from cause to effect. The manipulation strategy carried out by "Cebong" is dominated by connotations, and "Kadrun" is dominated by specific warrants and connotations. The fallacy expressed by "Cebong" is dominated by persuasive definitions; meanwhile, "Kadrun" is dominated by hasty generalizations. These findings could be suggestions for creating a healthier ecosystem in the digital public sphere in Indonesia. Twitter (X) users should be more aware of reporting content that indicates hate speech. By knowing the characteristics of hate speech and the characteristics of hate speech spreaders, Twitter users can stop the spread of hate speech.

 

Keywords: Cebong, Kadrun, hate speech, propagators, Twitter.


https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4002-01


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adiprasetio, J., Rahmawan, D., & Wibowo, K. A. (2021). A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority. Pacific Journalism Review: Te Koakoa, 27(1and2), 251–267. https://doi.org/mwbn

Afaf, N., Basit, A., Nurlukman, A., Wahyono, E., & Fadli, Y. (2019, November). Social media in the public sphere, network society, and political branding. Paper presented at the International Conference on Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019) (pp. 76-79). Atlantis Press.

Anindyajati, T. (2021). Limitation of the right to freedom of speech on the Indonesian Constitutional Court consideration. Indonesian Law Journal, 14(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.33331/ilj.v14i1.45

Azwar, A. I., & Nie, K. S. (2022). Factors influencing young Malaysians’ political information seeking behaviour on Twitter. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3803-06

Bankov, K. (2020). Cyberbullying and hate speech in the debate around the ratification of the Istanbul convention in Bulgaria: A semiotic analysis of the communication dynamics. Social Semiotics, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1731175

Banks, J. (2010). Regulating hate speech online. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 24(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2010.522323

Barnes, R. (2022). Fandom and polarisation in online political discussion: From pop culture to politics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/mwb2

Best, M. L., & Meng, A. (2015). Twitter democracy: Policy versus identity politics in three emerging African democracies. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 1–10.

Bilewicz, M., & Soral, W. (2020). Hate speech epidemic. The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Political Psychology, 41(S1), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670

Burhani, A. N. (2021, March 27). Digital civility of our society. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/english/2021/03/27/digital-civility-of-our-society

Burkitt, I. (2002). Complex emotions: Relations, feelings and images in emotional experience. Sociological Review, 50(S2), 151-167. https://doi.org/mwbp

Castaño-Pulgarín, S. A., Suárez-Betancur, N., Vega, L. M. T., & López, H. M. H. (2021). Internet, social media and online hate speech. Systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608

Das Sahu, S., & Kashyap, G. (2021). Digital activism and democracy: An analysis of select hashtags on Twitter (2016-2020). Communicator, 122–129.

Drone Emprit. (2022). Tren dan popularitas sebutan Cebong, Kampret, Buzerp, dan Kadrun. https://pers.droneemprit.id/tren-dan-popularitas-sebutancebong-kampret-buzerp-dan-kadrun/

Edwards, A. (2023). On liberation psychology, hate, hope, and healing. Journal of Hate Studies, 18(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.229

Fadillah, D., & Wibowo, A. A. (2022). The fall of public relation officer and the rise of influencer in the Indonesian government. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 15(1), 19-33.

Farkas, X., & Bene, M. (2021). Images, politicians, and social media: Patterns and effects of politicians’ image-based political communication strategies on social media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 119-142.

Gasarah, F., & Aye, G. (2015). Effect of household endowment on fertilizer use in rice production in Kwande, Benue State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 4(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2015/12272

Google. (n.d.). Policies for content posted by users on search. Retrieved January 1, 2024, from https://www.google.com/intl/en-US/search/policies/usercontent/

Grossberg, L. (1997). Bringing it all back home: Essays on cultural studies. Duke University Press.

Guillén-Nieto, V. (2023). Hate speech: Linguistic perspectives. De Gruyter.

Gurgun, S., Arden-Close, E., Phalp, K., & Ali, R. (2022). Online silence: Why do people not challenge others when posting misinformation? Internet Research, 33(5), 1928-1948. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-06-2022-0407

Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.

Henry, S. (2018). Social deviance. John Wiley & Sons.

Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257–270). SAGE.

Hine, C. (2015). Ethnographies of online communities and social media: Virtual ethnography and netnography. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1).

IDN Research Institute. (2023a). Indonesia gen Z report 2024: Understanding and uncovering the behavior, challenges, and opportunities.

IDN Research Institute. (2023b). Indonesia millennial report 2024: Understanding and Uncovering the behavior, challenges, and opportunities.

Jin, Y., & Tay, D. (2023). Offensive, hateful comment: A networked discourse practice of blame and petition for justice during COVID-19 on Chinese Weibo. Discourse Studies, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221129485

Judge, M., & Nel, J. A. (2018). Psychology and hate speech: A critical and restorative encounter. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(1). https://doi.org/mwbs

Kiper, J. (2023). Religious hate propaganda: Dangerous accusations and the meaning of religious persecution in light of the cognitive science of religion. Religions, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020185

Kurniawan, T. (2023). Tantangan governansi publik di era disrupsi: Memperkuat peran etika dalam pembuatan kebijakan. Universitas Indonesia.

Kyaw, N. N. (2019). Facebooking in Myanmar: From hate speech to fake news to partisan political communication. ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, 36, 1-10.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/gh7f5s

Lim, M. (2023). From activist media to algorithmic politics: The Internet, social media, and civil society in Southeast Asia. In E. Hansson & M. L. Weiss (Eds.), Routledge handbook of civil and uncivil society in Southeast Asia (pp. 25–44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367422080-3

Lipschultz, J. H. (2020). Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. Routledge.

Macagno, F. (2022). Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.022

Marques, T. (2023). The expression of hate in hate speech. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 40(5), 769-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12608

Mazrieva, E. (2021, February 26). Indeks keberadaban digital: Indonesia terburuk se-Asia Tenggara. VOA Indonesia. Voa Indonesia. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/indeks-keberadaban-digital-indonesia-terburuk-se-asia-tenggara/5794123.html

Meta Transparency Center. (n.d.). Facebook community standards. Retrieved January 1, 2024, https://transparency.fb.com/id-id/policies/community-standards/?source=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.facebook.com%2Fcommunitystandards%2Fobjectionable_content

Microsoft. (2021). Digital civility index.

Millar, S. (2019). Hate speech: Conceptualisations, interpretations and reactions. In M. Evans, L. Jeffries, & J. O'Driscoll (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language in conflict (1st ed., Chap. 8). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058011-9

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021

Nyi Kyaw, N. (2021). Social media, hate speech and fake news during Myanmar’s political transition. In A. Sinpeng & R. Tapsell (Eds.), From grassroots activism to disinformation: Social media in Southeast Asia (pp. 86-104). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/mwb3

Nyoka, P., & Tembo, M. (2022). Dimensions of democracy and digital political activism on Hopewell Chin’ono and Jacob Ngarivhume Twitter accounts towards the July 31 demonstrations in Zimbabwe. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/mwbv

General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI). (1966, December 16). International covenant on civil and political rights (adopted). United Nations Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

Pate, U. A., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2020). Fake news, hate speech and Nigeria’s struggle for democratic consolidation: A conceptual review. In A. Solo (Ed.), Handbook of research on politics in the computer age (pp. 89-112). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0377-5.ch006

Paz, M. A., Mayagoitia-Soria, A., & González-Aguilar, J. M. (2021). From polarization to hate: Portrait of the spanish political meme. Social Media and Society, 7(4). https://doi.org/mwbw

Paz, M. A., Montero-Díaz, J., & Moreno-Delgado, A. (2020). Hate speech: A systematized review. SAGE Open, 10(4), 215824402097302. https://doi.org/gmgbqw

Perera, S., Meedin, N., Caldera, M., Perera, I., & Ahangama, S. (2023). A comparative study of the characteristics of hate speech propagators and their behaviours over Twitter social media platform. Heliyon, 9(8), e19097. https://doi.org/mwbx

Pertiwi, W. K., & Nistanto, R. K. (2021, February 25). Tingkat kesopanan orang Indonesia di internet paling buruk se-Asia Tenggara. Kompas.com. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/02/25/12022227/tingkat-kesopanan-orang-indonesia-di-internet-paling-buruk-se-asia-tenggara

Petrescu, A., Truica, C. O., Apostol, E. S., & Karras, P. (2021). Sparse shield: Social network immunization vs. harmful speech. Proceedings of 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge (CIKM '21), 1426–1436. https://doi.org/mwbz

Priancha, A. (2021, June 2). Why digital literacy matters for Indonesia: Making the Internet work for all. Asia & the Pacific Policy Society. https://www.policyforum.net/why-digital-literacy-matters-for-indonesia/

Quan-Haase, A., & Sloan, L. (Eds.). (2022). The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (2nd ed). SAGE Publications.

Rino, A. (2020). Dealing with negative social media comments: The giant bullhorn that punctures holes in organizations’ walls, like an arrow to the chest. The McMaster Journal of Communication, 12(2), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.15173/mjc.v12i2.2173

Rodrigues, U. (2020). Political communication on social media platforms and its implications for the public sphere in India. In Athique, A. and Partharsarathi, V. (Eds.), Platform capitalism in India (pp. 161-173). Palgrave Macmillan.

Rumata, V. M., & Nugraha, F. K. (2020). An analysis of fake narratives on social media during 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(4), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3604-22

SAFEnet. (2023). Laporan pemantauan hak-hak digital Triwulan III 2023. https://safenet.or.id/id/2023/11/laporan-pemantauan-hak-hak-digital-triwulan-iii-2023/

SAFEnet. (2022). SAFEnet: Pemenuhan hak-hak digital di Indonesia kian memburuk. https://safenet.or.id/id/2023/03/safenet-pemenuhan-hak-hak-digital-di-indonesia-kian-memburuk/

Sanawi, J. B., Mustaffa, N., & Sannusi, S. N. (2022). Perbincangan politik di laman Twitter: Atribut isu politik dalam ciapan media di Malaysia Semasa tempoh pra dan pasca Pilihan Raya Umum Ke 14. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(4), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3804-13

Sari, T. I., Ardilla, Z. N., Hayatin, N., & Maskat, R. (2022). Abusive comment identification on Indonesian social media data using hybrid deep learning. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v11.i3.pp895-904

Sinpeng, A. (2021). Hashtag activism: Social media and the #FreeYouth protests in Thailand. Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/gnn9pb

Statista. (2023, January). Leading countries based on number of X (formerly Twitter) users as of January 2023.

Sumartias, S., Pulubuhu, D. A. T., Sudarmono, S., Noorlistyo Adi, A., & Ratnasari, E. (2023). Democracy in the Indonesian digital public sphere: Social network analysis of Twitter users’ responses to the issue of nationalism knowledge test at the Corruption Eradication Commission (TWK-KPK). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 26(3), 240. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.70896

Syahputra, I. (2021). The rise of political hatred in Twitter conversations of Indonesian netizens. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 6(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v6i1.518

Takikawa, H., & Nagayoshi, K. (2017). Political polarization in social media: Analysis of the “Twitter political field” in Japan. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 3143–3150. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258291

Tapsell, R. (2020). Deepening the understanding of social media’s impact in Southeast Asia. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

We are Social. (2023). Digital 2023 Indonesia. https://wearesocial.com/id/blog/2023/01/digital-2023/

X. (2023a, April). Kebijakan entitas kekerasan dan kebencian. https://help.twitter.com/id/rules-and-policies/violent-entities

X. (2023b, April). Kebijakan X tentang perilaku kebencian. https://help.twitter.com/id/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528