Al-Quran Digitalization: Adolescent View on the Value of the Digital Al-Quran Application
Abstract
This study analyses and explains the boundaries between the sacred and profane in digital Al-Quran applications contained in smartphones. This research uses an ethnographic approach. The research study subjects were Muslim teenagers who use digital Al-Quran applications. The results showed a difference in the treatment of Muslim teenagers using digital Al-Quran with the Al-Quran in the form of manuscripts. The existence of a digital Al-Quran makes its sacred value disappear due to the rites, ethics and prohibitions attached to it. In addition, some digital Al-Quran applications bring up advertisements and notifications that interfere with the user's focus on reading them. The development and convergence of the media have made secular values into the Al-Quran and finally eliminated the sacred value of the Al-Quran itself with the loss of the rituals attached to the Al-Quran. The results of this study indicate a novelty, namely that Muslim youth simplify the use of digital Al-Quran applications compared to manuscripts considered more sacred as God's revelation. This shows that modernisation has also bulldozed sacred religious institutions. So, this study criticises the theory of Emil Durkheim and Antony Giddens regarding sacred and profane contexts. Novelty in this research, namely that Muslim youth simplify using digital Al-Quran applications compared to manuscripts considered more sacred as God's revelation. This shows that modernisation has also bulldozed sacred religious institutions. So this study criticises the theory of Emil Durkheim and Antony Giddens regarding sacred and profane contexts.
Keywords: Digital Al-Quran, profane, rite, sacred, tradition.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
APJII. (2018a). Penetrasi & profil perilaku pengguna Internet Indonesia.
APJII. (2018b). Pengguna Internet di Indonesia tahun 2017.
Arifinsyah. (2014). Respon Islam dan Kristen terhadap modernitas. Analytica Islamica, 3(2), 274–295.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Blau, J. L. (1966). Modern varrieties of Judaism. London: Columbia Press.
Brasher, B. E. (2001). Give me that online. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Daradjat, Z. (1983). Perbandingan agama. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Dawson, L. L. (2001). Doing religion in cyberspace: The promise and the perils. The Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin, 30(1), 3–9.
Dawson, L. L., & Cowan, D. E. (2004). Reigion online: Finding faith on the Internet. Routledge.
Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: The Free Press.
Einstein, M. (2008). Brands of faith: Marketing religion in a commercial age. Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1973). Anthony Giddens - Capitalism and modern social theory_ An analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge University Press.
Giddens, A. (2003). Masyarakat post tradisional. Yogyakarta: Ircisod.
Giddens, A. (2006). Modernity and self-identity (Vol. 5). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Hafizah, N. H. Al, Norshah, S., & Nor, S. (2017). Development of Al-Quran android application from year 2013 to 2016: The highlight. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 183–195. https://doi.org/jwfp
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson. (1995). Etnography, principles in practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hatta, M. (2018). Media sosial sebagai sumber keberagamaan alternatif remaja dalam fenomena cyberreligion. Jurnal Kajian Dakwah dan Kemasyarakatan, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15408/dakwah.v22i1.12044
Hefni, W. (2020). Moderasi beragama dalam ruang digital: Studi pengarusutamaan moderasi beragama di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 13(1), 1–22.
Hidayat, S. (2016). Al-Qur’an digital (Ragam, permasalahan dan masa depan). Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 1(1), 1–40.
Horsfield, P. (2018). Rethinking the study of “religion” and media from an existential perspective. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 7(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888099-00701004
Irianingsih, E. T., Sudardi, B., & Wakit. (2018). Pengaruh era media baru dan terjadinya chaos identitas. Haluan Sastra Budaya, 2(1), 60–76.
Istriyani, R., & Widiana, N. H. (2016). Etika komunikasi Islam dalam membendung informasi hoax di ranah publik maya. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 36(2), 288–315.
Ivanov, A. V. (2018). Digital religion. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 18(4), 377–381. https://phpp.sgu.ru/en/articles/digital-religion
Kadir, K. A., Ashaari, N. S., & Judi, H. M. (2019). Indicators on Social Media Islamic Information Credibility through an Expert Agreement. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(2), 499–522.
Kellner, D. (2013). Baudrillard, Jean (1929-2007). In M. Danesi (Ed.), Encyclopedia of media and communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Larsen, E. (2004). Cyberfaith: How American pursue religion online. In L. L. Dawson & D. E. Cowan (Eds.), Religion online: Finding faith on the Internet (pp. 17–20). Routledge.
Lash, S. (2004). Sosiologi postmodernisme. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Madjid, N. (1995). Islam kemodernan dan keindonesiaan. Bandung: Mizan.
NU Online. (2015). Bolehkah membawa HP berisi aplikasi Al-Qur’an ke toilet. https://islam.nu.or.id/post/read/56821/bolehkah-membawa-hp-berisi-aplikasi-al-qurrsquoan-ke-toilet
Pitchan, M. A., Rahman, S. N. H. A., & Kashim, M. I. A. M. (2018). Teori Al-Daruriyyat dan penggunaan media sosial: Satu perbincangan konsep. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 75–92.
Preston, P. (2001). Reshaping communication, technology, information and social change. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Qodir, Z. (2018). Sosiologi agama teori dan perspektif keindonesiaan. (Hasse J., Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rahman, F. (1985). Islam dan modernitas tentang transformasi intelektual. Penerbit Pustaka.
Rahman, F. (2018). The death of the da’i: The autonomization of religious messages within cyberspace. Ulumuna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 22(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/jwfr
Schaap, J., & Aupers, S. (2016). “Gods in World of Warcraft exist”: Religious reflexivity and the quest for meaning in online computer games. New Media and Society, 19(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816642421
Setiansah, M. (2015). Smartphonisasi agama: Transformasi perilaku beragama perempuan urban di era digital. Jurnal Komunikasi, 10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/jwfs
Setiawan, R. (2016). Peran etika dalam pendidikan di era teknologi media sosial (Conference paper). Konfrensi HIDESI (Himpunan Dosen Etika Seluruh Indonesia) ke-XXVI. Universitas Ciputra. Surabaya, 21-23 Juli 2016. (pp. 1–15). Universitas Ciputra.
Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Spradley, J. P. (1997). Metode etnografi. Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana.
Sugihartati, R. (2014). Perkembangan masyarakat informasi dan teori sosial kontemporer (1st ed.). Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Sukma, A. P., Nugroho, W. B., & Zuryani, N. (2019). Digitalisasi Al-Quran: Meninjau batasan antara yang sakral dan yang profan pada aplikasi “Muslim Pro.” Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi (Sorot), 1(1), 1–15.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods a guidebook and resources. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Tsuria, R. (2019). Technologies of religion: Spheres of the sacred in a post-secular modernity written by Sam Han. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 8(1), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-00801012
Turner, B. S. (2013). Teori sosial dari klasik sampai postmodern (E. Setyawati, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wahyuni, D. (2017). Agama sebagai media dan media sebagai agama. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran dan Fenomena Agama, 18(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/jwft
Yuliana, Y. (2018). Pengaruh gadget (smartphone) bagi kehidupan keagamaan mahasiswa (Studi kasus pada Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen dan Ilmu Komputer Prabumulih Sumatera Selatan). Jurnal Pendidika
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528