Pembangunan Indikator Kesejahteraan Lelaki di Malaysia Melalui Perspektif Komunikasi Intrapersonal: Analisis Faktor Penerokaan

Siti Zaiton Mohd Ajis, Arina Anis Azlan, Emma Mohamad

Abstract


Kesejahteraan adalah konsep penting dalam kehidupan manusia kerana ia adalah keadaan emosi yang mampu mempengaruhi gaya hidup seseorang. Objektif kajian ini adalah membangunkan indikator kesejahteraan lelaki di Malaysia melalui perspektif komunikasi intrapersonal. Dalam kajian ini, penilaian kendiri dibentuk berdasarkan elemen teori konsep kendiri di mana ia merupakan sebuah bentuk komunikasi yang digunakan bagi memahami kesejahteraan responden. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kaedah campuran. Pendekatan kualitatif digunakan untuk membina dimensi dan penunjuk kesejahteraan berdasarkan beberapa kajian lepas, manakala pendekatan kuantitatif dilakukan untuk menentukan konstruk yang dianggap sahih untuk mengukur kesejahteraan lelaki, dan sejauh mana kebolehpercayaan konstruk tersebut. Pengumpulan data dijalankan melalui tinjauan irisan lintang atas talian menggunakan platform Survey Monkey. Seramai 290 orang responden yang terdiri daripada golongan lelaki warganegara Malaysia yang berumur 18 tahun ke atas telah mengambil bahagian dalam kajian ini. Dapatan ujian EFA menunjukkan terdapat 33 item telah diklasifikasikan di bawah enam komponen utama kesejahteraan dengan mempunyai tahap keberkesanan ketekalan yang efektif dan sangat baik, di mana Alpha Cronbach bagi enam komponen ini memberikan nilai lebih daripada .70. Hasil daripada kajian ini, indikator kesejahteraan yang telah dibentuk diwakili oleh satu item penilaian kendiri yang mengukur dimensi kesejahteraan. Melalui dapatan yang diperolehi, kajian ini membuka ruang yang lebih luas tentang kajian kesejahteraan dalam konteks lelaki di Malaysia. Walau bagaimanapun, dicadangkan agar kajian ini dilanjutkan dengan kajian analisis pengesahan faktor bagi mengesahkan indikator kesejahteraan sebagai pengukur kesejahteraan dalam konteks lelaki di Malaysia.

 

Keywords: Kesejahteraan, kesejahteraan subjektif, komunikasi intrapersonal, teori konsep kendiri, penilaian kendiri.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3704-12


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (Edisi kedua). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(6), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308093860

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, Dec 26). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL). CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/wellbeing.htm

Chua, Y. P. (2009). Statistik penyelidikan lanjutan ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (Buku 5). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education.

Combs, A. W. (1971). New concepts of human potentials; New challenge for teachers. Childhood Education, 2, 349-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1971.10727294

Costanza, R., Fisher, B., & Ali, S. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 161, 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023

Courtenay, W. H. (2003). Key determinants of the health and well-being of men and boys. International Journal of Men’s Health 2(1), 1-30.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an Economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. L., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. https://doi.org/fqqbmr

Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Easterlin, R. A. (2013). Happiness and economic growth: The evidence. IZA Discussion papers series. No. 7187, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7187. https://ftp.iza.org/dp7187.pdf

Fitts, W. H. (1965). The Tennessee self conceptscale manual. Nashville: Conselor Recordings and Test.

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Galloway, A. T., Fiorito, L., Lee, Y., & Birch, L. L. (2005). Parental pressure, dietary patterns, and weight status among girls who are “picky eaters”. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(4), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2005.01.029

Guilford, J. P., & Frunchter, B. (1973). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Healey, G. W., & De Blassie, R. R. (1974). A comparison of Negro, Anglo and Spanish American adolescents` self-concepts. Adolescence, 9(33), 15-24. PMID: 4440532.

Jamiah Manap, Suzana Mohd Hoesni, & Mohd Rezal Hamzah (2018) . Family communication amongst conventional Malay man. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(1), 238-252.

Jurkovic, D., & Walker, G. A. (2006). Examining masculine gender-role conflict and stress in relation to religious orientation and spiritual well-being in Australian Men. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 14(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1401.27

Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Routledge.

McLead, D. M. (2008). Quality of life indicators. In Lavrakas, P. J. (Ed.), Ecyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Inc.

Mei Chin Boo, Siew Hwa Yen, & Hock Eam Lim. (2016). A note on happiness and life satisfaction in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 53(2), 261–277. https://mjes.um.edu.my/index.php/MJES/article/view/2772

Odimegwu, C., Pallikadavath, S., & Adedini, S. (2013). The cost of being a man: social and health consequences of Igbo masculinity. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 15(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2012.747700

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.

Ridge, D., Emslie, C., & White, A. (2010). Understanding how men experience, express and cope with mental distress: Where next?. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01266.x

Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research Inc.

Sarah, M. S. (2012, April 25). Self-concept theory. Explorable.com. https://explorable.com/self-concept-theory

Snygg, D., & Combs, A. W. (1950). The phenomenological approach and the problem of "unconscious" behavior: A reply to Dr. Smith. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45(3), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055904

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Edisi ke-5). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2014). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311–343. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJHD.2014.066115

Ventegodt, S., Merrick, J., & Andersen, N. J. (2003). Quality of Life Theory I. The IQOL theory: An integrative theory of the global quality of life concept. The Scientific World Journal, 3, 1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.82

Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis. State College, Pennsylvania: Ed & Psych Associates.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528