Communication Experiences of Pekanbaru City Patients Receiving In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment in Malaysia Fertility Clinics
Abstract
Doctor-patient communication is important in all medical consultations including for In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment. An unfavourable communication experience can cause a patient to stop taking the treatment, move to another local fertility clinic, or even seek treatment abroad. There are still few studies documenting communication experiences of patients with infertility seeking reproductive treatment in other countries. This study aimed to describe the communication experiences of Indonesian IVF patients receiving IVF treatment from medical practitioners in fertility clinics in Malaysia. This study used Benner's interpretive phenomenology framework in its approach and when analysing the results. Data collection was carried out using in-depth and semi-structured interviews with 11 IVF patients from Pekanbaru city Indonesia who received IVF treatment in fertility clinics in Malaysia. This study found three main themes shared by the IVF patients’ communication experiences: 1) memorable experiences (friendliness and caring, empathy, honesty and openness, clarity and adequacy of the information, and easiness of communication; 2) less memorable experiences (less interpersonal communication, less warm non-verbal communication, and miscommunication); and 3) communication barriers (English). These findings have important implications for both the prospective patients receiving cross-border fertility treatment in the future and for service providers providing fertility treatment to improve doctor-patient communication.
Keywords: Health communication, doctor-patient communication, communication experience, infertility, cross-border reproductive care, in vitro fertilisation treatment.
https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3704-01
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alshammari, M., Duff, J., & Guilhermino, M. (2019). Barriers to nurse-patient communication in Saudi Arabia: An integrative review. BMC Nursing, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0385-4
Bennett, L., & Pangestu, M. (2017). Regional reproductive quests: Cross-border reproductive travel among infertile Indonesian couples. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 58(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12160
Berkey, F. J., Wiedemer, J. P., & Vithalani, N. D. (2018). Delivering bad or life-altering news. American Family Physician, 98(2), 99–104.
Bhuiyan, B. A., Urmi, I. J., Chowdhury, M. E., Rahman, T., Hasan, A. S., & Simkhada, P. (2019). Assessing whether medical language is a barrier to receiving healthcare services in Bangladesh: An exploratory study. BJGP Open, 3(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/g9vd
Cersosimo, G. (2019). Interaction and symbolism in health care systems. Italian Sociological Review, 9(2), 305–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.13136/isr.v9i2
Chandran, S. D., Mohamed, A. S. P., Zainuddin, A., Puteh, F., & Azmi, N. A. (2017). Medical tourism: Why Malaysia is a preferred destination? Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7861–7864. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9595
Cox, A., & Li, S. (2020). The medical consultation through the lenses of language and social interaction theory. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25(1), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-09873-2
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mix methods approaches (5th edition). SAGE Publications.
Effendi, R., Sukmayadi, V., & Pandjaitan, I. R. (2019). The effects of doctors’ interpersonal communication on low-income inpatients’ satisfaction level. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3501-05
Handayani, I. (2020). 4000 pasien Indonesia jalani program bayi tabung di Malaysia. Investor.id. https://investor.id/lifestyle/4000-pasien-indonesia-jalani-program-bayi-tabung-di-malaysia
Hidayat, D., Anisti, Purwadhi, & Wibawa, D. (2020). Crisis management and communication experience in education during the covid – 19 pandemic in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3603-05
Ismail, F., & Omar, B. (2018). Kesan gaya komunikasi doktor perubatan terhadap kepuasan pesakit. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3403-05
Jacobson, H. (2020). Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: Who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase? Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online, 11, 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003
Klitzman, R. (2018). Impediments to communication and relationships between infertility care providers and patients. BMC Women’s Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0572-6
Larasati, T. A. (2019). Komunikasi dokter-pasien berfokus pasien pada pelayanan kesehatan primer. Jurnal Kedokteran Universitas Lampung, 3(1), 160–166.
Lasheras, G., Mestre-Bach, G., Clua, E., Rodríguez, I., & Farré-Sender, B. (2020). Cross-border reproductive care: Psychological distress in a sample of women undergoing In Vitro Fertilization treatment with and without Oocyte donation. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 14(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2020.5997
Leone, D., Borghi, L., Negro, S. Del, Becattini, C., Chelo, E., Costa, M., Lauretis, L. De, Ferraretti, A. P., Giuffrida, G., Livi, C., Luehwink, A., Palermo, R., Revelli, A., Tomasi, G., & Tomei, F. (2018). Doctor–couple communication during assisted reproductive technology visits. Human Reproduction, 33(5), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey069
Liu, C.-H. (2020). Linking cross-cultural communication to work engagement and creativity: What you ruminate matters [ETD graduate thesis, The State University of New Jersey]. Rutgers. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/64991/
Marca-Frances, G., Frigola-Reig, J., Menéndez-Signorini, J. A., Compte-Pujol, M., & Massana-Morera, E. (2020). Defining patient communication needs during hospitalization to improve patient experience and health literacy. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4991-3
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications Inc.
Mulyana, D., Dida, S., Suminar, J. R., & Indriani, S. S. (2019). Communication barriers between medical practitioners and patients from medical practitioners’ perspective. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(4), 2797–2811.
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
Pandey, M., Maina, R. G., Amoyaw, J., Li, Y., Kamrul, R., Michaels, C. R., & Maroof, R. (2021). Impacts of English language proficiency on healthcare access, use, and outcomes among immigrants: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06750-4
Ratna Sari, D., Kartikasari, D., & Herya Ulfah, N. (2021). Impact of effective communication on the quality of excellent service and patient satisfaction in the outpatient department. KnE Life Sciences, 2021(ISMoPHS 2020), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v0i0.8883
Saad, F., & Ahmad, A. L. (2021). Pengalaman adaptasi silang budaya Pembantu Rumah Indonesia (PRI) di Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(3), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3703-06
Salama, M., Westphal, L. M., Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2021). Cross‐border reproductive care background. In K. Sharif (Ed.), Assisted reproduction techniques: Challenges and management options (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119622215.ch113
Saragih, H. S., & Jonathan, P. (2019). Views of Indonesian consumers towards medical tourism experience in Malaysia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(4), 507–524.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-04-2018-0135
Skär, L., & Söderberg, S. (2018). Patients’ complaints regarding healthcare encounters and communication. Nursing Open, 5(4), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.132
Sobur, A., & Mulyana, D. (2020). Filsafat komunikasi: Tradisi, teori, dan metode penelitian fenomenologi (Edisi revi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tanjung, B. H. (2016). Puluhan ribu warga Riau pilih berobat ke Malaysia. Okezone.Com. https://news.okezone.com/read/2016/10/02/340/1504266/puluhan-ribu-warga-riau-pilih-berobat-ke-malaysia
Taufik, N. A., & Sulistiadi, W. (2018). The impact of medical tourism industry for the hospital services and marketing activities: A systematic review. Jurnal Administrasi Rumah Sakit, 5(1), 42–48.
Tolotti, A., Bagnasco, A., Catania, G., Aleo, G., Pagnucci, N., Cadorin, L., Zanini, M., Rocco, G., Stievano, A., Carnevale, F. A., & Sasso, L. (2018). The communication experience of tracheostomy patients with nurses in the intensive care unit: A phenomenological study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 46, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2018.01.001
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2021). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (7th edition). McGraw Hill.
Whittaker, A., Inhorn, M. C., & Shenfield, F. (2019). Globalised quests for assisted conception: Reproductive travel for infertility and involuntary childlessness. Global Public Health, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2019.1627479
Xiao, A. (2018). Konsep interaksi sosial dalam komunikasi, teknologi, masyarakat. Jurnal Komunikasi, Media dan Informatika, 7(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/g9vk
Zailani, N. F. I., Albattat, A., Yee, W. S., Md Nazri, M. H., & Zuraimi, N. S. (2021). Tourist motivation factors towards health and wellness tourism in Malaysia. Paper presented at 4th International Scientific Conference: Restarting Tourism, Travel and Hospitality: The Day After. Research Gate.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528