The Theory of Ethiopian Logos: A Semiotics Analysis

Jemal Mohammed

Abstract


Just like a human face, a logo is the principal image of a given institution. This research explored the types of messages Ethiopian public universities want to construct and mediate by the use of logo as well as the definite pattern the logo usage has followed. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were employed. By using semiological content analysis, all the available logos of Ethiopian public universities were analyzed. In order to obtain the main philosophical root of the employments of the logos as tools of communication, various in-depth interviews were conducted with communication and public relations directors/experts of eight universities. Peirce’s model of semiotics was used as a theoretical frame. The finding of the study discloses that the universities are highly engaged in entertaining dual messages, i.e. modernism vs. traditionalism, through their logos. The leaders of the universities are fascinated in constructing and representing their reality in such a way that modernity is highly required while traditional treasures have obtained special attention. The study discovers that the very essence of a logo is highly misunderstood among the leaders of the public universities of Ethiopia. Furthermore, excessive pictures are used within a logo and many of them are undersized while the imitation of signs is very high (up to 98%). In short, the universities have failed to construct a strong and distinct visual identity. The researcher draws the theory of the Ethiopian institutional logo (i.e. circle-ness, imitativeness, stuffing, miniaturization, localized-ness, predictableness and symbolic-fixation) that guides the production of visual signs.

 

Keywords: Logo, visual identity, Ethiopia, university, semiotics.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Airey, D. (2010). Logo design love: A guide to creating iconic brand identities. USA: New Riders.

Bergman, T. (2009). Documentary film theories. In, Encyclopaedia of communication theory. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.

Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.

Cobley P., & Jansz, L. (2003). Introduction to semiotics (Ed. Richard Appignanesi). UK: Icon Books Ltd.

Cowin, E. (2008). The evolution of U.S. corporate logos: A semiotic analysis (Thesis Degree, Master of Arts in the Department of Communication, University of Central Florida, Orlando).

Crable, B. (2009). Meaning theories. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of communication theory. UK: SAGE Publications.

Danesi, M. (2004). Messages, signs, and meanings: A basic textbook in semiotics and communication (3rd ed.). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.

DiMarco, P. (2017). 5 principles of good logo design in logo design. Retrieved from https://qubeshub.org/groups/saber/File: Principles_of_logo_design.pdf

Fairhurst, G. (2008). Organizational discourse. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopaedia of communication. Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Fitsumbirhan, S. (2006). Representation of power relations in Ethiopian newspaper front page photographs: A semiotic analysis (Unpublished thesis masters, Addis Ababa University).

Henderson, P. W., & Cote, J. A. (1998). Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 14–30.

Khan, B. (2008). A visual and linguistic analysis of three advertisements for condoms. Cambodia: Institute of Foreign Languages Royal University of Phnom Penh, Russian Federation Blvd.

Kasahun Kebede. (2015). What has to be done on the Ethiopian higher educational institutes’ logos?. Hirmata Newspaper, 1(2).

Kordjazi, Z. (2012). Images matter: A semiological content analysis of gender positioning in contemporary English-learning software applications. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 6(1), 59-80.

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2009). Semiotics and semiology. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of communication theory. UK: SAGE Publications.

Lulu, R., Asoro, R, Lee, S., & Sela, S. (2013). Gestalt principles in destination logos and their influence on people's recognition and intention to visit a country. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3(1, January).

Merrell, F. (2005). Charles Sanders Peirce’s concept of the sign. In P. Cobley (Ed.), Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London: Routledge.

Ministry of Education (MoE). (2016). Retrieved from www.moe.gov.et/

Nadihezda, S., & Stephen, R. (2006). Corporate visual identity: The communicational role of the brand name and the logo (Bachelor Thesis, Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden).

Jamani, K. (2011). A semiotic discourse analysis framework: Understanding meaning in science education contexts. In S. C. Hamel (Ed.), Semiotics theory and applications. NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. USA: Indiana University Press.

Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Signs: An introduction to semiotics (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Sirna, Z. T. (2012). Ethiopia: When the Gadaa democracy rules in a federal state. Bridging indigenous institutions of governance to modern democracy (Thesis master, University of Tromsø, Norway). Retrieved from https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/5080

Steinman, C. (2008). Sign. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopaedia of communication. Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2009). Semiotics and semiology. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss, (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of communication theory. UK: SAGE Publications.

Whan, C., Andreas, E., Pol, G., & Park, W. (2013). The role of brand logos in firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 66, 180–187.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528