Agenda Setting: Probing the Issues during the 13th General Election

Syed Arabi Idid

Abstract


This study discusses the development of agenda setting and its application in political communication especially in general elections in Malaysia. The vast majority of studies on Agenda Setting have found widespread support for a media influence on issue salience despite studies used different methodologies and issues. The theory postulates that people were simply led to think about the agenda as set by the media. The salience of the media agenda would then be reflected as the people agenda, measured through rank correlation. With the emergence of technologies, questions arise among scholars about whether the theory on Agenda Setting would remain viable in later years and whether people would continue to obtain their news from a given number of media outlets, given the range of new media channels being made available over the years. The discussion of this study contributes to a better understanding of agenda setting in current Malaysian media landscape. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, M. H. T., Ahmad, A. L. & Chang, P.K. 2016. The exposure of media frames among Malaysian bloggers pre and post 13th General Election. Malaysian Journal of Communication 32(2): 425-452.

Bartle, J. & Laycock, S. 2012. Telling more than they can know? Does the most important issue really reveal what is most important to voters. Electoral Studies 31(4): 679-688.

Beniger, J.R. 1993. Communication: Embrace the subject, not the field. Journal of Communication 43(30): 18-25.

Berelson, B. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.

Berger, C. R. 1991. Why are there so few communication theories: Communication theories and other curiosities. Communication Monographs 58(1): 101-113.

Bryant, J., & Miron, D. 2004. Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication 54(4): 662-704.

Bryant, J., & Pribanic-Smith, E. J. 2010. A historical overview of research in communication science. In The Handbook of Communication Science, edited by Charles R. Berger, Michael E. Roloff and David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen, 21–36. London: Sage.

Chaffee, S.H. & Metzger, M.J. 2001. The end of mass communication? Mass Communication & Society 4(4): 365-379.

Colistra, R. 2012. Shaping and cutting the media agenda: Television’s reporters’ perceptions of agenda frame building and agenda cutting influences. Journalism and Mass Communication Monographs 14(2): 93-94. doi: 10.1177/1522637912444106.

Davidson, W. P. & Yu, F. T. C. 1974. Some priority areas for future research. In Mass communication research: Major issues and future directions, edited by W. Phillips Davison and Frederick T. C. Yu, 184-196. New York: Praeger Publishers.

Gans H.J. 1972. The famine in American mass communication research: Comments on Hirsh, Tuchman, and Gecas. American Journal of Sociology 77(4): 697-705.

Herbst, S. 1993. History, philosophy, and public opinion research. Journal of Communication 43(4): 140-145.

Idid, S. A. 1994. Penentuan Agenda: Peranan Media Massa Dalam Pilihanraya Umum. Kuala Lumur: DBP.

Idid, S. A. 2013. The past and coming journey. Presented at the International Conference on Media and Communication. Media and Communication Transformation: Synergizing Communities, Government and Industries, jointly organised by School of Media and Communication Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, UKM and the South-South Information Gateway (SSIG), Ministry of Communications and Multimedia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 26 – 28 November 2013, Bangi.

Idid, S. A., & Chang, P.K. (2012). The media and public agenda among the Malay and Chinese communities during the 2008 Malaysian General Elections. Asian Social Science 8(5): 107-115.

Jennings, W. & Wlezien, C. 2011. Distinguishing between most important problems and issues. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(3): 545-555.

Johnson, T. J 2014. Introduction. Agenda setting in a 2.0 World. In Agenda Setting In A 2.0 World: New Agenda in Communication, edited by Thomas J. Johnson, xv-xxv. London: Routledge.

Kim, J. N., & Grunig, J. E. 2011. Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication 61: 120–149.

Kim, K. & McCombs, M. 2007. New story descriptions and the public’s opinion of political candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 82(1): 299-314.

Lang, A. 2013. Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication Theory 23(1): 10-24.

Mancini, P. 2013. Media fragmentation, party system and democracy. The International Journal of Press/Politics 18(1): 43-60.

Mathes, R & Pfetsch, B. 1991. The role of the alternative press in the agenda-building process: Spill-over effects and media opinion leadership. European Journal of Communication 6: 33-62.

McCombs, M. 2004. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.

McCombs, M. & Shaws, D. L. 1972. The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176-187. doi: 10.1086/267990.

McCombs, M. & Ghanem, S. I. 2001. The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, edited by Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, Jr., and August E. Grant, 67–83. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pfau, M. 2008. Epistemological and disciplinary intersections. Journal of Communication 58(4): 597-602.

Potter, W. J., Cooper, R., & Dupagne, M. 1993. The three paradigms of mass media research in mainstream communication journals. Communication Theory 3: 317-335.

Potter, W. J., & Riddle, K. 2007. A content analysis of the media effects literature. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84: 90-104.

Ragas, M. W., & Roberts, M. S. 2009. Agenda setting and agenda melding in an age of horizontal and vertical media: A new theoretical lens for virtual brand communities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86(1): 45-64.

doi: 10.1177/107769900908600104.

Salman, A., Mustaffa, N., Mohd Salleh, M. A. & Ali, M.N.S. 2016. Social media and agenda setting: Implications on political agenda. Malaysian Journal of Communication 32(1): 607-623.

Shehata, A. & Stromback, J. 2013. Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual levels. The International Journal of Press/Politics 18(2): 234-255.

Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. 2008. The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. Journal of Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 85(4): 860-877.

Wanta, W., & Ghanem, S. 2007. Effects of agenda setting. In Mass Media Effects Research: Advances Through Meta-Analysis, edited by Raymond W. Preiss, Barbara M. Gayle, Nancy Burrell, Mike Allen and Jennings Bryant, 37-51. New York: Routledge.

Weaver, D. H. 2009. Political issues and voter need for orientation. In Agenda Setting. Readings on Media, Public Opinion, and Policy Making, edited by David L. Protess and Maxwell E. McCombs, 131-147. London: Routledge.

Wilson, S., Leong, P., Nge, C., & Ngerng, M. H. 2011. Trust and credibility of urban youth on online news media. Malaysian Journal of Communication 27(2): 97-120.

Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. 2013. A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication 30(2): 175-192.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528