Manipulation of Vehicle Scales in Legal Metrology
Abstract
To ensure Malaysia’s economic growth aligns with modern technologies, a focused approach to legal metrology is essential, particularly regarding the manipulation of vehicle scales. These scales play a critical role in commercial transactions but are increasingly vulnerable to unauthorized alterations, compromising measurement integrity. Regulatory bodies, including the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs (KPDN), the National Metrology Institute of Malaysia (NMIM), and the Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB), have implemented inspection and enforcement programs to address these manipulative practices. However, instances of manipulation persist, driven by traders exploiting loopholes within existing regulations, particularly in the Weights and Measures Act 1972. This legislation has not kept pace with advancements in technology, allowing traders to tamper with computerized weighing systems. To effectively combat this issue, legal metrology must evolve by incorporating advanced software verification and enhancing the training of inspectors to assess software integrity. Additionally, regulatory frameworks should be updated to establish clear guidelines for the certification and monitoring of vehicle scales, reinforcing compliance and accountability. Addressing manipulation within legal metrology is crucial for protecting consumers and ensuring fair trade practices, ultimately fostering a transparent trading environment that supports sustainable economic growth and enhances the integrity of vehicle scales in Malaysia’s trade ecosystem.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahsan Mohamed Nazim, Ismael Abu Jarad, Mohamed Sulaiman, and Ibrahim bin Hamzah, (2019). Malaysians’ awareness towards legal metrology and Weights and Measure Act 1972: The case of Metrology Corporation Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(4), 617. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2019-0003
Ardianto, R., & Oktriana, B. (2021). The behaviour of consumer and strategy of development of legal metrology performance. The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 5(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v5i2.200
Asia–Pacific Legal Metrology Forum (APLMF). (2017). Legal proposal for nominations of OIML Award 2017 for excellent achievements in legal metrology in developing countries. Retrieved March 1, 2024, from https://www.aplmf.org/uploads/5/7/4/7/57472539/oiml_award_2017_malaysia_final.pdf
Asia–Pacific Legal Metrology Forum (APLMF). (2017). Legal proposal for nominations of OIML Award 2017 for excellent achievements in legal metrology in developing countries. Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www.aplmf.org/uploads/5/7/4/7/57472539/oiml_award_2017_malaysia_final.pdf
Asia–Pacific Legal Metrology Forum (APLMF). (n.d.). Legal metrology: Accurate measurement, good business, fair trade, and safety. Retrieved June 2, 2024, from https://www.aplmf.org/uploads/5/7/4/7/57472539/02_aplmf_guide_to_legal_metrology_7.pdf
Azman Adam. (2016). APLMF economy report: Malaysia. 23rd APLMF Meeting, Tokyo, Japan.
Birch, J. (2003). Benefit of legal metrology for the economic and society: A study for the international committee of legal metrology. Paris: International Organization of Legal Metrology.
CFA Institute. (2024, April). Standard II(B): Market manipulation. Retrieved from https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/ethics-standards/ethics/code-of-ethics-standards-of-conduct-guidance/standards-of-practice-II-B
Crown, L., & Olson, D. (Eds.). (2017). Weights and measures program requirements: A handbook for the weights and measures administrator. NIST Handbook 155. U.S. Department of Commerce & National Institute of Standards and Technology.
De Metrology Sdn Bhd. (n.d.). Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://demetrology.com.my
Digital Transformation, Recollective. (2020, November 3). MITI monthly bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.virtualpaper.pro/index.php?route=mag/highlight&tracking=5fae00eb6011e
Er Ah Choy. (2014). Environmental sustainability of oil palm cultivation and palm oil milling in Malaysia. Cluster Research Grant, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Esche, M., Nischwitz, M., & Toro, F. G. (2022). Investigation into the applicability of software requirements from legal metrology to sensor networks. 2022 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC48687.2022.9806447
Fedrizzi, M., & Ventre, V. (2013). Fraud measurement using ordered weighted aggregation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 11(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2008.10700545
Grottker, U., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Software in legal metrology. OIML Bulletin, 4, 24.
Hockert, C., Butcher, C. T., Crown, L., Harshman, R., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (2015). Specifications, tolerances, and other technical requirements for weighing and measuring devices. NIST Handbook 44. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
International Organization of Legal Metrology. (2019). OIML D31: General requirements for software-controlled measuring instruments.
International Organization of Legal Metrology. (2024). National metrology systems. Retrieved March 8, 2024, from https://www.oiml.org/en/about/policy-and-legislation/pdf/bipm-oiml-d1-global.pdf
Kalejaiye, P. O. (2023). Addressing shortage of skilled technical workers in the USA: A glimpse for training service providers. Future Business Journal, 9, Article 228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00228-x
Malaysian Qualifications Agency Act 2007.
Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Malaysia (KPDN). (n.d.). Portal of weights and measures enforcement. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://www.kpdn.gov.my//ms/perdagangan/penguatkuasaan/penguatkuasaan-timbang-dan-sukat
Muhammad Azwan Ibrahim, Nazri Marzuki, Osman Zakaria, Zarina Shukur, Nasharuddin Zainal, and Maryati Mohd. Yusof. (2018). Legalizing software for measuring instruments: A proposed plan for Malaysian case study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 7(2), 99.
Muhammad Azwan Ibrahim (2021). Mysani: Model pemeriksaan metrologi sah bagi perisian alat timbang kenderaan berasaskan komputer universal menggunakan polinomial ditransformasika (Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (n.d.). The United States and the metric system. Retrieved February 1, 2024, from https://usma.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/1136a.pdf
National Metrology Institute of Malaysia. (n.d.). Retrieved May 13, 2024, from https://www.nmim.gov.my/index.hp/legal-metrology
Richter, D. (2006). Editorial: Validation of software in metrology. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 28(3), 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2005.07.004
Rubiah binti Mohd Amin, Haniff bin Ahamat, and Muhamad Sayuti bin Hassan (2024). Food sovereignty towards rice sustainability. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, 32(1), 29.
Valcu, A. (2006). Calibration of nonautomatic weighing instruments. In XVIII IMEKO World Congress: Metrology for a sustainable development (pp. 17–22).
Vâlcu, A. (2021). Monitoring the validity of reported results in weighing operations according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017. IML Bulletin, 62(2), 5.
Velychko, O., Gaman, V., Gordiyenko, T., & Hrabovski, O. (2019). Testing of measurement instrument software with the purpose of conformity assessment. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(9), 19. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.154352
Wanjiru, N. F. (2012). Challenges facing the use of technology on legal metrology: The case of Meru Municipality, Kenya (Master’s dissertation). University of Nairobi.
Weight Scale Malaysia. (n.d.). Weight scale calibration. Retrieved October 1, 2024, from https://weightscale.my/weight-scale-certification
Wirandi, J., & Lauber, A. (2006). Uncertainty and traceable calibration: How modern measurement concepts improve product quality in the process industry. Measurement, 39, 612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2006.01.008
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694