Leadership Attributes of Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, The Eighth Malaysian Prime Minister

Syed Arabi Idid, Zeti Azreen Ahmad, Ssemuddu Imran

Abstract


This image study examines the leadership and personality traits of Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, the 8th Prime Minister of Malaysia, based on an open-ended response provided by Malaysian voters. Studying leadership contributes to a greater understanding of leaders’ role in society as they supposedly inspire others towards attaining citizenship goals. Still, if wrongly led, they would also damage the country. Leadership has gained importance as a field of study, although the focus is still Western-centric. There are studies on good and bad leaders covering various sectors. Malaysia is regarded as one of Asia's most politically stable countries, having had one-party leadership since independence. Studies on Malaysian leadership have been scarce despite being a stable nation in diverse, multicultural societies. This study focuses on Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, a seasoned politician whose strategy brought him to occupy the highest office in Malaysia. The exploratory research using a qualitative approach probed how Malaysians perceived his leadership and personality traits when he was the Prime Minister. A research design using a questionnaire was used in this study to collect data on 822 respondents from a nationwide survey. The findings showed that Malaysians identified certain traits of leadership and their prime minister's personality. Still, there were differences in identifying them among the three racial groups in the country. The characteristics collected were then collapsed into categories to understand better the Malaysian leader.


Full Text:

PDF

References


't Hart., P. 2014. Contextual analysis? In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and Paul ‘t Hart, 210-224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Al-Huzaim, Yusef Othman. 2011. The Principles of Leadership: In the Light of Islamic Heritage and the American Experience. Riyadh: Maktaba Darussalam.

Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. 2018. Leadership: Past, present, and future. In The Nature of Leadership, edited by John Antonakis and David V. Day, 3–26. Sage Publications, Inc.

Bentz, V. J. 1990. Contextual issues in predicting high-level leadership performance: Contextual richness as a criterion consideration in personality research with executives. In Measures of Leadership, edited by Kenneth E. Clark and Miriam B. Clark, 131-143. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.

Blondel, J. 1987. Political Leadership: Towards a General Analysis. London: Sage.

Blondel, J. 2014. What have we learned? In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and Paul ‘t Hart, 705-718. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boston, J., Homola, J., Sinclair, B., Torres, M. & Tucker, P.D. 2018. The dynamic relationship between personality stability and political attitudes, Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1): 843–865, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy001

Haraida, B., & Blass, E. 2019. Recognising true ‘leadership: The theory of natural-born leadership. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 10(4).

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. 2011. The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power. London: Psychology Press.

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. 2020. The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, influence, and power. London: Routledge.

Hay, I., & Dempster, N. 2004. Student Leadership Development Through General Classroom Activities. Educating: Weaving research into practice: Volume 2, 141.

Helms, L. 2014. Institutional analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and Paul ‘t Hart, 195-209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hermann, M. G. 2014. Political psychology and the study of political leadership. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and Paul ‘t Hart, 1-16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., & Lyons, B. D. 2011. Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 84: 347-381.

Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. 1994. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49(6): 493-504. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.6.493

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. 2001. Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.003

Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. 2018. Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29: 549–569.

Jaes, L. Razali, N. A, Mohd Yusof, A. M., & Mohd Suhaimy, K. A. 2021. 100 Days of Muhyiddin’s Government Leadership: A Manifestation of the Continuity of Paternalism Values. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(2): 755-763.

Kanat-Maymon, Y., Elimelech, M., & Roth, G. 2020. Work motivations as antecedents and outcomes of leadership: Integrating self-determination theory and the full-range leadership theory. European Management Journal, 38(4): 555–564.

Kellerman, B. 2004. Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Happens, Why It Matters. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Kirkpatrick, S. A. & Locke, E. A. 1991. Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy Of Management Executive, 5(2): 48 - 60.

Koo, H., & Park, C. 2018. Foundation of leadership in Asia: Leader characteristics and leadership styles review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3): 697-718.

Lin, Y., Kelemen, M., & Kiyomiya, T. 2017. The role of community leadership in disaster recovery projects: Tsunami lessons from Japan. International Journal of Project Management, 35(5): 913-924.

Lobo, M.C. 2014. Party and electoral leadership. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and Paul ‘t Hart, 362-276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lord, R. G., DeVader, C. L., & Alliger, G. M. 1986. A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalisation procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3): 402-410.

Nwachukwu, C. E., Chladkova, H., Zufan, P., & Olatunji, F. 2017. Visionary leadership and its relationship to corporate social performance. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(4): 1302–1311.

Pierce, J. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (2006). Leaders & The Leadership Process: Readings, Self-Assessments, & Applications (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Razack, V. H. B. A. (2017). The Malay Leadership Mystique. Kuala Lumpur: August Publishing.

Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. H. 2014. Social psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and Paul ‘t Hart, 149-160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Samimi, M., Cortes, A. F., Anderson, M. H., & Herrmann, P. 2020. What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research. The Leadership Quarterly.

Shome, A. S. K. 2002. Malay Political Leadership. London: Routledge.

Stogdill, R. M. 1948. Personal factors associated with leadership; a survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 25: 35- 71.

Stogdill, R. M. 1974. Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research. New York: Free Press.

Suleyman Temiz & Arshad Islam. 2019. Charismatic political leadership and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s Malaysia: Power, control, stability and defence. Intellectual Discourse, 27(2): 475-505.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694