Pembudayaan Etika dan Penyelesaian Konflik dalam Kalangan (Ethics Inculcation and Mitigating Conflict Among Development Agents in Kelantan)

Suhana Saad (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, suhana@ukm.my), Suraiya Ishak (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, suraiya@ukm.my)

Abstract


In general, Malaysia is still faced with blatant development disparity within states, region and urban-suburban. The National Mission of the Ninth Malaysia Plan (2006-2010) and the National Integrity Plan (2004) has focused on the development parity as one of the main agenda of the country. Hence, one of the main challenges is to strengthen the integrity of federal-state development agents and all parties involved in the economic and political governance of the country. This article focuses on the political-economic development scenario in Kelantan to discuss the ethical issues embedded in the federal-state relationship and the weaknesses of the existing delivery system. Secondary reports such as the state and the country’s official reports are used as the main sources in discussing the issue. Agency theory is used to describe the relationship that exists between the federal-state agents. This is because the citizens are the principles, who had delegated the authority to administer the resources owned by the country and the state, to the administrator-agents at the state and national levels. As such, the state and federal administrators (politicians and government servants) would have opportunities for easy access to valuable resources, and thereby influence its distribution as well as development implementation at the grass roots level. From the discussion, it can be said that the development agents’ behaviour at the state and national levels has posed as hindrances to the development processes, that ultimately put the residual cost on the rakyat (citizens). Efforts to strengthen integrity among political agents and administrators are becoming increasingly indispensable for managing conflicts among federal-state development agents.

Keywords: Federal-state agents, agency theory, integrity; ethical behaviour; conflict agencies

ABSTRAK

Secara umumnya, Malaysia masih berhadapan dengan masalah ketidakseimbangan pembangunan yang ketara antara negeri, wilayah dan juga desa-bandar. Misi Nasional RMK 9 (2006-2010) dan Pelan Integriti Nasional (2004) telah mensasarkan agenda memupuk keseimbangan pembangunan sebagai salah satu matlamat penting yang ingin dicapai. Justeru, cabaran utama yang harus ditangani ialah memantapkan integriti antara agen pembangunan pusat-negeri, juga dalam kalangan golongan yang terlibat dalam urus tadbir ekonomi dan politik negara. Makalah ini memfokus kepada senario pembangunan ekonomi-politik Kelantan sebagai kes dalam melihat isu etika yang terkandung dalam perhubungan agen pusat-negeri serta kelemahan sistem penyampaian yang wujud. Sumber-sumber sekunder seperti laporan rasmi negeri dan negara digunakan sebagai sumber utama dalam mengupas isu ini. Teori Agensi telah digunakan bagi melihat perhubungan antara agen pusat-negeri tersebut. Justifikasi bagi menggunakan Teori Agensi ialah kerana rakyat merupakan prinsipal yang telah mendelegasi kuasa mentadbir sumber milik negeri dan negara kepada agen- agen pentadbir di peringkat negeri dan pusat. Oleh yang demikian, agen-agen pentadbir negeri dan pusat (politik serta penjawat awam), mempunyai peluang untuk memperolehi capaian mudah kepada sumber-sumber berharga negeri dan negara, seterusnya mempengaruhi bentuk agihan dan pelaksanaan pembangunan di peringkat akar umbi. Berdasarkan perbincangan, boleh dikatakan perlakuan agen pembangunan peringkat pusat dan negeri merupakan penghalang kepada kelancaran pembangunan negeri yang akhirnya meletakkan kos residual dalam bentuk kemunduran kepada prinsipal utama, iaitu rakyat. Usaha memantapkan integriti dalam kalangan agen politik dan pentadbiran adalah alat inovatif yang semakin diperlukan bagi menangani konflik yang terdapat dalam kalangan agen pembangunan pusat-negeri.

Kata Kunci: Agen pusat-negeri; Teori Agensi; integriti; perlakuan etika; konflik agensi


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Halim Ali. 2001. Leadership and Good Governance. Dlm. Good Governance Issues and Challenges. Samsudin Osman, Zulkurnain Hj. Awang dan Sarojini Naidu (ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara.

Abdul Samad Haji Alias. 2003. Lessons to be Learnt from Enron Case: Implications on Corporate Governance in Malaysia. Public Lecture. Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM): 16 Disember.

Abdullah Sanusi Ahmad. 1987. Kerajaan, Pentadbiran dan Rakyat. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Anuar Razak. 2000. Democracy and Good Governance: An Ethical Approach. Proceedings PPA. 5th Natonal Civil Service Conference. Good Governance: Issues and Challenges. National Institute of Public Administration (INTAN), Public Service Department Malaysia and Administrative and Diplomatic Service Association (PPTD) Malaysia, 22-24 June.

Baglini, N.A. 2001. Ethical Behavior, Corporate Culture and Financial Services. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance. 26(3): 367-372.

Donaldson, L. 2005. For Positive Management Theories While Retaining Science: Reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1): 109-113.

Drinkard, L. 1996. Silent theft. Restaurants and Institutions. 106(6): 116-117.

Ghoshal, Sumantra. 2005. Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1): 75-91.

Gibbon, E. 1963. The Decline and Fall of the Romen Empire. London: Chatto & Windus.

Gutner, T. 2005a. World Bank Environmental Reform: Revisiting Lessons from Agency Theory. International Organization 59: 773-783.

Gutner, T. 2005b. Explaining the Gaps between Mandate and Performance: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. Global Environmental Politics 5(2): 10-37.

Harakah. 2006. 1 Oktober. Harakah. 2006. 8 April. In-Won Hwang. 2003. Personalized Politics: The Malaysian State under Mahathir. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Ishak Shari. 1988. Pembangunan dan Kemunduran: Perubahan Ekonomi Luar Bandar di Kelantan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. 2004. Buletin Perangkaan Sosial Malaysia.

Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.

Kulik, B.W. 2005. Agency Theory, Reasoning and Culture at Enron: In Search of a Solution. Journal of Business Ethics 59: 347-360.

Majlis Perunding Ekonomi Negara. 2001. Dasar Pembangunan Wawasan 2001-2010.

Mathews, R. 1997. Loss Prevention: It’s Later Than You Think. Progressive Grocer. 76(2): 70-72.

Mohammad Agus Yusoff. 1988. Federalism in Malaysia: A Study of the Politics of Centre-State Relations. PhD Thesis. University of Manchester.

Mohd Affandi Hassan. 1985. Pengurusan, Pentadbiran dan Kepemimpinan dalam Pembinaan Tamadun Manusia. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Pembangunan Pengurusan (PUSPA) dan Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara.

Mohd Izani Mohd Zain. 2005. Islam dan Demokrasi: Cabaran Politik Muslim Kontemporari di Malaysia. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

Mohd Yusof Kasim, Mohd Shukri Haji Noor & Rashila Ramli. 2001. Citizen Perceptions on Good Governance: The Case of Malaysia Professionals. Dlm. Good Governance Issues and Challenges. Samsudin Osman, Zulkurnain Hj. Awang dan Sarojini Naidu (ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara.

Mohd Yusuf Al-Qardawi. 1986. Iman dan Kehidupan. Shah Alam: Dewan Pustaka Fajar.

Mohd. Salleh Abas. 1997. Prinsip Perlembagaan dan Pemerintahan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Mustafar Haji Ali. 2005. Membina Integriti untuk Memerangi Rasuah. Dlm. Etika dan Integriti di Malaysia:Isu dan Cabaran. Mazilan Musa, Izal Arif Zahrudin dan Suzana Che Moin (ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Integriti Malaysia.

Nik Mustapha Hj. Nik Hassan. 1999. Jawatankuasa Keutuhan Pengurusan. Kertas Kerja Konvensyen JKP. Renaissance Palm Garden Hotel, Putrajaya, 20-21 September 1999.

Negara Kita. 1980. Sejarah, Pentadbiran dan Dasar Pembangunan. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara.

Noordin Sopiee & Razali Mohamed Ali. 2001. Business, ethics and politics. Dlm. Ethics in Business and Management: Islamic and Mainstream Approaches. Khaliq Ahmad & Abu Hasan M. Sadeq (ed.). United Kingdom: Asean Academic Press.

Perutusan Y.A.B Dato’ Seri Abdullah Haji Ahmad Badawi .2004. Pelan Integriti Nasional 2004-2008. http://www.iim.com. my/v2/pin/bm/index.htm.

Pfeffer, J. 2005. Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1): 96-100.

Malaysia. 2006. Rancangan Malaysia Ke-9 (2006-2010). Unit Perancang Ekonomi.

Román, S. 2003. The Impact of Ethical Sales Behavior on Customer Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty to the Company: An Empirical Study in the Financial Services Industry. Journal of Marketing Management. 19: 915-939.

Khaliq Ahmad & AbulHasan M. Sadeq (ed.). 2001. Ethics in Business and Management: Islamic and Mainstream Approaches. United Kingdom: Asean Academic Press.

S. Husin Ali. 1978. Kemiskinan dan Kelaparan Tanah di Kelantan. Petaling Jaya: Percetakan Abadi Sdn. Bhd.

Schnatterly, K. 2003. Increasing Firm Value Through Detection and Prevention of White-Collar Crime. Strategic Management Journa. 24: 587-614.

Sidek Baba. 2006. GLCs and Human Capital: Raising Capacity for Knowledge and Innovation and Nurture First Class Mentality. Seminar on 9th Malaysia Plan and GLCs “Empowering GLCs Up The Economic Value Chain”. Putra world Trade Centre, Kuala Lumpur: 6-7 Julai.

Sridharan, U.V., Dickes, L. & Caines, W.R. 2002. The Social Impact Of Business Failure: Enron. Mid-American Journal of Business. 17(2): 11-21.

Steidlmeier, P. 1992. People and Profits: The Ethics of Capitalism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sulaiman Mahbob. 2005. Pelan Integriti Nasional. Dlm. Etika dan Integriti di Malaysia. Isu dan Cabaran. Mazilan Musa, Izal Arif Zahrudin & Suzanna Che Moin (ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Integriti Malaysia.

Thomson, J.A.K. 1955. The Ethics of Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated. Penguin Classics.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi. 1986. Rancangan Malaysia Ke Lima 1986-1990.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi. 1991. Rancangan Malaysia Ke Enam 1991-1996.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi. 2006. Rancangan Malaysia Ke Sembilan 2006- 2010.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi. 2001a. Eighth Malaysia Plan 2001-2005.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi. 2001b. Kajian Separuh Penggal RMK 8, 2001- 2005.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi. 2004. Kualiti Hidup Malaysia.

Zarinah Anwar. 2005. Etika dan Keuntungan: Satu Keseimbangan. Dlm. Etika dan Integriti di Malaysia. Isu dan Cabaran. Mazilan Musa, Izal Arif Zahrudin dan Suzanna Che Moin (ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Integriti Malaysia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694