Pembandaran dan kehidupan bandar di Semenanjung Malaysia (Urbanisation and Urban Life in Peninsular Malaysia)

Abdul Rahman Embong (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, rahmanhe@ukm.my)

Abstract


This article argues that with about 70 percent of Malaysia’s population already living in towns and cities and the urbanisation process is still ongoing, urban living and urbanism have become a way of life and a key element in Malaysia’s civilization. However, urban living for the Malays and other Bumiputera communitities is relatively new although it is not new for most of the Chinese and Indians. The existence of new urban social relations, however, does not necessarily replace family and community relations. This article shows that while Loius Wirth’s criticism of urban culture in respect of the spread of individualism, and the importance of formal social control is correct, the role of human agency should not be overlooked. Human beings as agencies are able to create and recreate social relations and organisations to suit their social needs and guided by their cultural and religious values. This is supported by evidence of efforts to build communities and the existence of relatively sustainable communities in the urban milieu. This article also demonstrates that among urbanites in major cities such as Kuala Lumpur and Penang, a substantial number perceive the city as their permanent home because life in big cities has already become part of them, and also for practical reasons; however, there are also sections of those of regard such cities mainly as venues in building their career and not as places for permanent living. The situation is quite different in smaller cities especially Kota Bharu and Melaka where there is a sense of permanency, with cities being perceived not just as places to earn a living but also as places for retirement. However, the rising cost of living has become the greatest challenge for urbanites especially those from the lower classes residing in big cities.

Keywords: Urbanisation; urbanism; urbanites; community; Malaysia

ABSTRAK

Artikel ini menghujahkan bahawa memandangkan kira-kira 70 peratus penduduk Malaysia sudah tinggal di bandar dan proses pembandaran masih terus berlaku, maka kehidupan bandar atau urbanisme sudah menjadi cara hidup dan unsur penting dalam peradaban masyarakat Malaysia. Namun kehidupan bandar khususnya bagi orang Melayu dan Bumiputera lain adalah suatu pengalaman baru sungguhpun, tidak baru bagi sebahagian besar kaum Cina dan India. Kewujudan hubungan sosial baru yang urban sifatnya tidak semestinya melenyapkan hubungan kekeluargaan dan komuniti. Artikel ini menunjukkan walaupun kritikan Louis Wirth terhadap budaya masyarakat bandar adalah tepat dari satu segi meluasnya individualisme, ketidakpedulian dan perlunya kawalan sosial yang formal, tetapi peranan manusia sebagai agensi yang mampu membentuk semula hubungan dan organisasi sosial mereka bagi memenuhi tujuan kehidupan sosial berpandukan nilai-nilai budaya dan keagamaan tidak boleh diketepikan. Ini jelas terbukti dengan usaha pembentukan komuniti dan wujudnya komuniti yang agak utuh walaupun dalam masyarakat bandar. Artikel ini juga menunjukkan di kalangan penghuni bandar besar seperti Kuala Lumpur dan Pulau Pinang terdapat sejumlah yang memutuskan tempat itu sebagai tempat tinggal tetap mereka kerana mereka sudah bersebati dengan kehidupan kota dan juga kerana soal praktikal, tetapi ada sebahagian lain menganggap bandaraya sebagai laluan tempat membina kerjaya dan bukannya tempat tetap mereka seumur hidup. Keadaannya berlainan dengan ramai penghuni bandar pertengahan, lebih-lebih lagi bandar seperti Kota Bharu dan Melaka di mana kehidupan di bandar itu menjadi matlamat tempat tinggal tetap, bukannya sebagai tempat ‘mencari makan’ semata-mata. Namun, cabaran terbesar kehidupan di kalangan penghuni bandar terutamanya bandar besar ialah kenaikan kos hidup yang menghantui khususnya mereka daripada golongan bawahan.

Kata kunci: Pembandaran; urbanisme; penghuni bandar; komuniti; Malaysia


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Rahman Embong. 1996. Social Transformation, the State and the Middle Classes in Post-independence Malaysia. Southeast Asian Studies (Kyoto University) 34(3): 56-79.

State-led Modernization and the New Middle Class in Malaysia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Between Optimism, Contestation and Caution: The Second Generation Middle Classes in Malaysia. Dlm. The Changing Faces of the Middle Classes in Asia-Pacific Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao (ed.). Taipei: Academia Sinica.

Abdul Samad Hadi.2001. Laluan Ke Arah Pembandaran di Malaysia. Akademika 58.

Ahmad Ariffian Bujang, Hasmah Abu Zarin & Mohd Razali Agus. 2008. Urban Housing Ownership: Factors Influnced the Problems Faced by the Bumiputera in the District of Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia. http://docs.google.com (PDF dicapai pada 4 Februari 2011).

Armstrong, M. Jocelyn. 1984. Women’s Friendship in the Context of Adaptation to Urban Living: A Malaysian Case Study. Working Paper No. 70. November. Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Azahan Awang, M.J. Jamaluddin, Lukman, Z.M., Kamaruddin A. & Kadir, A. 2009. The Quality of Life in Malaysia’s Intermediate City: Urban Dwellers Perspective. European Journal of Social Science 9(1): 161-167.

Brown, David. 1994. The State and Ethnic Politics in Southeast Asia. London & NewYork: Routledge.

Dasimah Omar. 2008. Communal Living Environment in Low Cost Housing Development in Malaysia. Asian Social Science 4(10): 98-105.

Fischer, Johan. 2008. Proper Islamic Consumption: Shopping among the Malays in Modern Malaysia. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

Malaysia. 1996. Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996-2000. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Mid-Term Review of the Seventh Malaysia Plan 1996-2000. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Ninth Malaysia Plan, 2006-2010. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department.

Tenth Malaysia Plan, 2011-2015. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department.

McGee, Terry. 2009. The Spatiality of Urbanization: The

Policy Challenges of Mega-Urban and Desakota Regions of Southeast Asia. UNU-IAS Working Paper No. 161. Yokohama: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.

Sherina, M., Sidik Rampal, L., Aini, M. & M. Norhidayati, H. 2005. The Prevalence of Depression among the Elderly in an Urban Area of Selangor, Malaysia. The International Medical Journal 4(2) December 57-63.

Wirth, L. 1938. Urbanism as a Way of Life. American Journal of Sociology 44: 1-24.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694