Kualiti dan Prestasi Kerja Graduan Kolej Komuniti: Penilaian oleh Majikan Bandar (Quality and Job Performance of Community College Graduates: Urban Employers Assessment)

ABD HAIR AWANG (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, hair@ukm.my), MOHD YUSOF HUSSAIN (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, hmyusoff@ukm.my), ZAIMAH RAMLI (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, zaimah@ukm.my), IZZURAZLIA IBRAHIM (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

Abstract


Higher learning institution should be able to produce graduates with sufficient specific knowledge, skills and attitude in line with the national human capital development strategy. Continuous improvement of the higher education quality and capability are the most important for the current and future labour market demand. Therefore, the community colleges had introduced courses that are relevant to the needs of the industry. The main objectives of this article are to evaluate the quality and job performance of the community college graduates. A total of 140 employers were chosen to evaluate the graduate. The results show that the majority of the employers rated them as good in the field in specialization, communication, information and technology, leadership, teamwork, ethics and value. However, the employers rated moderate in decision making and solving problems, work plan, thinking skills, innovation and English proficiency. From the employers’ point of view, there is no obvious shortcoming in the community college graduates. Moreover, there is a significant relationship between the graduate’s quality and job performance of community college graduates. However, the quality of the graduate in productivity (salary) is insignificant except academic qualification and service period.

Keywords: Community college; employee quality; job performance; productivity; graduate

ABSTRAK

Institusi pendidikan tinggi seharusnya mampu melahirkan graduan yang mantap pengkhususan ilmu pengetahuan, kemahiran dan sikap selari dengan hasrat pembangunan modal insan negara. Peningkatan kualiti berterusan pendidikan tinggi amat penting untuk memenuhi permintaan pasaran buruh semasa dan masa hadapan. Sehubungan itu, Kolej komuniti menawarkan kursus yang relevan dengan keperluan industri. Justeru itu, objektif artikel ini menilai kualiti dan prestasi kerja lulusan kolej komuniti yang berada di pasaran buruh. Sebanyak 140 majikan menilai lulusan kolej komuniti yang berkhidmat di syarikat mereka menerusi borang kaji selidik. Kajian mendapati majoriti majikan memberikan nilai baik dalam aspek pengkhususan, komunikasi dan interpersonal, teknologi maklumat, etika dan nilai. Namun, majikan memberikan nilai sederhana aspek penyelesaian masalah dan membuat keputusan, perancangan kerja, kemahiran berfikir, inovasi dan kefasihan berbahasa Inggeris. Hasil kajian juga mendapati wujud hubungan yang signifikan antara kualiti graduan dengan prestasi kerja subjektif bagi lepasan kolej komuniti. Namun demikian tidak terdapat hubungan dan pengaruh yang signifikan antara kualiti graduan dengan produktiviti (gaji) kecuali bagi kelayakan akademik dan tempoh perkhidmatan.

Kata kunci: Kolej komuniti; kualiti pekerja; prestasi kerja; produktiviti; graduan



Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar, S. 2003. Increased input supplies, government size, welfare and trade in the presence of increasing returns. Journal of Economics 78(3): 259-272.

Ariffin Hj. Zainal 1985. Pekerja dan Pekerjaan: Pendekatan Psikologi Personel. Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti.

Bank Negara. 2002. Employability of Graduates – Survey Report. Kuala Lumpur: Bank Negara Malaysia.

Becker, G. S. 1993. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bernardin, J. & Russell, J. 1993. Human resource management. McGraw-Hill International Edition.

Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Dlm. Personnel Selection in Organizations, disunting oleh Schmitt, N. & Bonnan, W. C., 71-98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. 1997. A theory of individual different in task and contextual performance. Human Performance 10(2): 71-83.

Boyatzis, R. E. 1982. The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Brauns, H., Gangl, M. & Scherer, S. 2003 Education and unemployment risks among market entrants: a comparison of france, the United Kingdom and West Germany, Dlm. Advances in Cross- national Comparison. A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-economic Variables, disunting oleh J.H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & C. Wolf, 328-345. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum .

Catano, V. M., Wiesner, W. H., Hackett, R. D. & Methot, L. L. 2001. Recruitment and Selection in Canada. Toronto: Nelson Education Ltd, Toronto, Canada.

Dessler, G. 2003. Human Resource Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Fatimah Daud. 2006. Pengurusan sumber manusia: persepsi majikan terhadap graduan. Dlm. Transformasi dan Perubahan Sosial, disunting oleh Mohd Fauzi Yaacob, 149-164. Kuala Lumpur: Arah Publication.

Faustino Cardoso Gomes. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. 2003. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly 27: 265– 287.

ILO. 2003. Learning and Training for Work in the Knowledge Society. Geneva: International Labor Office.

IPPTN. 2003. Laporan Akhir Kajian Masalah Pengangguran di Kalangan Siswazah. Penang: Institut Penyelidikan Pendidikan Tinggi Negara. Penang. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Ishak Yussof, Rahmah Ismail & Robiah Sidin. 2008. Graduan dan alam pekerjaan: kes siswazah UKM. Akademika 72 (Januari): 3-24.

Jabatan Pengajian Kolej Komuniti. 2010. http://www. bpkk.edu.my/?lang=my&id=1&mnu=1. Diakses pada: 5 Julai 2010.

Jabatan Perdana Menteri. 2010. Model ekonomi baru. http://www.anm.gov.my/public_html/upload/ model_ekonomi_baru.pdf. Diakses pada: 7 Mac 2011.

de Jong, J. P. J & Den Hartog, D. N. 2008. Innovative Work Behavior: Measurement and Validation. Netherlands: Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Zoetermeer: Netherland.

John R. B. & John R. S. 2000. Work ethic measurement of vocational students in Georgia. Journal of Vocational Education Research 25(4): 503-531.

Kak, N., Burkhalter, B & Cooper, M. A 2001. Measuring the competence of healthcare providers. Quality Assurance Project 2(1): 1-28

Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi, 2010. Pelan Strategik Pengajian Tinggi Negara, http://www.mohe.gov. my/transformasi/. Diakses pada: 19 Mac 2011.

Kementerian Belia dan Sukan. 2010. Pelan Strategik KBS. Putrajaya: Kementerian Belia dan Sukan

Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. 2009. Laporan

Ekonomi Malaysia 2009/2010. Putrajaya: Percetakan Nasional

Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. 2010. Laporan

Ekonomi Malaysia 2010/2011. Putrajaya: Percetakan Nasional

Koko Sujatmoko. 2007. Pengaruh Insentif terhadap

Peningkatan Prestasi Kerja Karyawan pada Departemen Operasional Pemasaran Dunkin’ Donut Cabang Arteri Jakarta. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Lewin, K. M. 1993. Education and development the issues and the evidence. Education Research Paper No. 06, Centre for International Education University of Sussex, UK.

Leon, J. & Borchers, R. E. 1998. High school graduate employment trends and the skills graduates need to enter Texas manufacturing industries. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education 15(1).

Md. Zabid Rashid. 2003. Strategies to reduce unemployment among graduates and youth. Majlis Tindakan Ekonomi Negara. Putrajaya: Jabatan Perdana Menteri.

MEF. 2003. Local graduates Need to back-up. Kenyataan akhbar persekutuan majikan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Employers Federation. http:// www.mef.org.my. Diakses pada: 23 Ogos 2010.

Milan J. & Polona T. 2008. Professional competences of graduates as a labour market mechanism for aligning business school curriculum reform with the bologna declaration principles. Management 13: 17-36.

Mohd Hanafiah Omar. 2011. Dorongan dan semangat kerja berpasukan di kalangan Pekerja.

http://www.google.com.my/#hl=en&q=pekerja+berkua liti=pekerja+berkualiti. . Diakses pada: 1Julai.

Mondy, R. W., Noe , R. M & Premeaux , S. R. 2002. Human Resource Management. Edisi kelapan. New Jersey : Prentice Hall. MTEN. 2001. Study on the unemployment situation

in Malaysia. Majlis Tindakan Ekonomi Negara. Putrajaya: Jabatan Perdana Menteri.

Nurulpaik, I. 2005. Pendidikan sebagai investasi. http://

www.pikiranrakyat. com/cetak.0404/05/teropong/

lainnya05.htm. Diakses pada: 20 Julai 2011.

OECD. 1999. Human Capital Investment: An International Comparison. Paris: Center for educational and innovation.

Olaniyan, D. A. & Okemakinde T., 2008. Human capital

theory: implications for educational development. Pak. J. Social Sci. 5: 479-483.

Patrinos, H. A., & Psacharopoulos, G., 2011. Education Past, Present and Future Global Challenges. Policy Research Working Paper 5616. The World Bank.

Patricia K. Z., Gerald L. L. Jr. & Jay R. S. 1996. Competencies and competency models: does one size fit all? ACA Journal 5(1): 56-65.

Paul S. H. 2001. Differences between Chinese and Western managerial views of performance. Personnel Review 30(2): 203-226.

Prabowo. 2005. Prestasi Kerja. http://webcache.

googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:itow WMBATBoJ:www.rusmanmalili.com/pdf/prestasi- kerja-oleh-prabowo-2005.html+Prabowo+(2005) (8 Februari 2011).

Rahmah Ismail, Azimi Hamzah, Abd Hair Awang, Asma Ahmad & Jegak Uli. 2004. Kompetensi tenaga kerja: Keseimbangan antara tuntutan majikan dan penguasaan pelatih. Persidangan Kebangsaan Penyelidikan Siswazah Pengajian Pendidikan. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Roger, B. H. & Gregory, C. P. 1995. A new look at selected employability skills: a factor analysis of the occupational work ethic. Journal of Vocational Education Research 20(4): 59-73

Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. N. 1998. Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education C(f): 231-24.

Schultz, T. W. 1963. The Economic Value of Education. New York: Columbia University Press.

Tachibanaki, T. 1994. Education, occupation, hierarchy and earnings. Economics of Education Review 7(2): 221-229.

Taidin Suhaimin. 2011. Ciri-ciri dan jati diri pekerja cemerlang.

http://www.ugmc.bizland.com/ak-pekerjacemerlang. html. Diakses pada: 1 Julai 2011.

Tamkin, P. 2005. The Contribution of Skills to Business Performance. Report RW39, Department for Education and Skills, Institute for Employment studies. Brighton, UK.

Tim, H. 2003. From apprentice to instructor: work ethic in apprenticeship training. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 33(1).

Utusan Malaysia. 2010. 32,000 graduan masih menganggur. Kementerian Sumber Manusia Malaysia. 30 Jun.

VichitaVathanophas & Jintawee Thai-Ngam. 2007. Competency requirements for effective Job performance in the Thai public sector. Comtemporary Management Research. Mahidol University.

William, J.R. & Kanzanas, H.C. 1994. Human resource development: A strategic approach. United States: HRD Press, Inc.

Zargari, A. 1997. Vocational-technical education’s role in welfare reform: Providing employability skills for welfare recipients. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 34(3): 86-94.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694