Pendidikan Awam untuk Pemuliharaan Warisan: Kajian Kes Langkawi Geopark (Public Education for Heritage Conservation: A Case Study of Langkawi Geopark)

NORZAINI AZMAN (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, norzai12@ukm.my), RUSLIN AMIR (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia), IBRAHIM KOMOO (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, komoo@ukm.my), SHARINA ABD HALIM (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

Abstract


This article discusses the research findings on public education for heritage conservation. The research aims to determine the level of awareness and understanding on geopark and heritage conservation from the perspectives of the various stakeholders. The data gathered from the study serves as important baseline information in preparing tools and mechanism for public education as well as educational tools and programmes to promote understanding and awareness among the various stakeholders of geopark. This research also seeks to summarise various approaches to non-formal education and awareness programmes from local community. The sample comprises various stakeholders, namely the local authorities, hoteliers and resort managers, tourist operators and tourists, local community, students and teachers. The findings of the study indicate relatively low levels of awareness and understanding among the stakeholders mainly regarding the geopark concept, heritage conservation and role of Langkawi geopark in the local community socioeconomic development activities. Thus, effective and innovative development tools and public educational mechanisms are crucial to address the findings of this study. The development of tools and mechanisms for public education must give emphasis to: 1) level of understanding of the targeted group in developing content; 2) inculcation of shared values particularly those that bring benefits to regional sustainable development and community livelihood; 3) conservation of geological, biological and cultural heritage should initially be separately taught, but eventually, these components must be taught in an integrated manner; 4) introduction of tourism-based products related to geopark; and 5) education on geopark in schools should be systematically planned and implemented. Suffice to say that the development of the approaches and strategies for effective public education must give priority to the needs, interest and abilities of the target groups i.e. the stakeholders for optimal effectiveness of public education programmes.

Keywords: Public education, heritage conservation, stakeholders, community development, geopark

ABSTRAK

Makalah ini membincangkan dapatan kajian mengenai pendidikan awam untuk pemuliharaan warisan. Kajian bertujuan menentukan tahap pemahaman, maksud dan konsep (pengetahuan) mengenai geopark dan pemuliharaan warisan. Maklumat terkumpul penting untuk dijadikan asas bagi menyediakan peralatan dan mekanisma pendidikan tak rasmi (informal) dan bukan rasmi (non-formal), dan bahan untuk mempromosikan pemahaman dan kesedaran pelbagai pihak berkepentingan mengenai geopark. Kajian ini juga bermatlamat merumus beberapa pendekatan pendidikan awam dan program kesedaran komuniti tempatan. Pihak berkepentingan yang dipilih terdiri daripada agensi pelaksana, pengusaha hotel dan resort, operator pelancongan dan pelancong, komuniti tempatan, serta pelajar dan guru sekolah. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa kesedaran dan pemahaman kebanyakan pihak berkepentingan terhadap konsep geopark, pemuliharaan warisan dan kepentingan Langkawi Geopark untuk membangunkan tahap sosio-ekonomi komuniti tempatan adalah masih rendah. Pembangunan peralatan, bahan dan mekanisma pendidikan awam perlu memberikan pertimbangan kepada beberapa perkara berikut: 1) tahap kefahaman pihak berkepentingan semasa perlu dijadikan asas untuk menyediakan kandungan; 2) penerapan nilai bersama, khususnya faedah untuk kelestarian wilayah dan kesejahteraan komuniti diberikan penekanan utama; 3) aspek pemuliharaan warisan geologi, biologi dan budaya boleh diterapkan secara berasingan dan secara beransur-ansur memperkenalkan konsep pemuliharaan warisan bersepadu; 4) memperkenalkan kepentingan pembangunan produk pelancongan, khususnya produk yang berasaskan geopark; dan 5) pendidikan geopark di sekolah di Langkawi dibangunkan secara bersistem. Pembangunan pendekatan dan strategi pendidikan awam yang berkesan perlu memberikan perhatian utama terhadap kepentingan matlamat pendidikan untuk pelbagai pihak berkepentingan dan hasrat yang ingin dicapai.

Kata kunci: Pendidikan awam, pemuliharaan warisan, pihak berkepentingan, pembangunan komuniti, geopark



Full Text:

PDF

References


Aplin, G. 2007. Heritge as an Exampler: A Pedagogical Role for Heritage Studies in Values Education. Environmentalist 27:375-383.

Berkes, F. 2001. Religious Traditions and Biodiversity. Encyclopaedia of Biodiversity 5:109-120.

Calder, W. & Clugston, R. 2005. Education for Sustainable Future. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 29/1: 7-12.

Day, B. & Monroe, M. 2000. Environmnetal Education and Communication for a Sustainable World: Handbook for International Practitioners. Washington: Academy for Educational Development.

De Grosbois, A. M. & W. Eder 2008. Geoparks - a Tool for Education, Conservation and Recreation. Environmnetal Geology 55:465-466.

Ibrahim Komoo. 2000. Conservation Geology: A Multidisciplinary Approach in Utilization of Earth Resources Without Destruction. Dalam Ibrahim Komoo & Tija H.D. (eds). Geological Heritage of Malaysia – Resource Development for Conservation and Nature Tourism. Bangi: LESTARI UKM.

Ibrahim Komoo & Patzak, M. 2010. Global Geoparks Network: An Integrated Approach for Heritage Conservation and Sustainable Use. Dalam Geoheritage of East and Southeast Asia.

Mohd Shafeea Leman, Reedman, A. & Chen Shick Pei (eds.). 3-13. Bangi: LESTARI UKM.

Jacobson, S.K. Monroe, M.C. & Marynowski, S. 2001. Fire at the Wildlife Interface: The Influence of Experience and Mass Media on Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavioural Intentions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29(3): 929-

Knudson, D. M., Cable, T.T, & Beck, L. 1995. Interpretation of Cultural and Natural Resources. Venture Publishing Inc. State College, PA.

Maffi, L. 1998. Language: A Resource for Nature. Nature and Resources. UNESCO Journal on the Environment and Natural Resources Research 34(4):12-21.

Mohd Shafeea Leman, Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani, Ibrahim Komoo & Norhayati Ahmad. 2007. Langkawi Geopark. Bangi: LESTARI UKM.

Norzaini Azman, Sharina Abdul Halim & Ibrahim Komoo 2009. Integrated Public Education For Heritage Conservation: A Case for Langkawi Global Geopark. Dalam RIMBA: Sustainable Forest Livelihoods in Malaysia and Australia. Ainsworth, G. & Garnett, S. (eds.). 151-156. Bangi: LESTARI UKM.

Norzaini Azman, Sharina Abdul Halim & Ibrahim Komoo 2010. Transforming and Researching Local Communities in Malaysia: Experience from National University of Malaysia. Dalam Transforming and Researching Communities. Lucio-Villegas, E. (ed.) 279-287. ESREA, University of Lower Silesia & Universidad de Seville: Xativa, Seville.

Pretty, J., Adams, B., Berkes, F., de Athayde, S.F., Dudley, N., Hunn, E., Maffi, L., Milton, K., Rapport, D., Robbins, P., Sterling, E., Stolton, S., Tsing, A., Vintinner, E. & Pilgrim, S. 2009. The Intersections of Biological Diversity and Cultural Diversity: Towards Integration. Conservation and Society 7(2):100-112.

UNESCO 1988. Operational Guideline for the Implementation of the World Heritage Conservation. UNESCO WHC/2/ Revised December 1988. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. Global Geoparks Network 2006. Division of Ecology and Earth Sciences Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO 1978. Final Report. Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation with United Nations Environmental Program in Tbilisi, USSR, 14-16 October 1977. UNESCO, ED/MD/49, Paris, France.

Wilson, E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694