Isu dan Hala Tuju Pendidikan Ekonomi Universiti di Malaysia

MANSOR JUSOH (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, mansorj@ukm.my), JAMAL OTHMAN (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, jortman@ukm.my)

Abstract


Economics education in Malaysian universities ought to address in a balanced manner three fundamental functions - career; scholarly, and the development of the mind. Market signals indicate that economics discipline per se has not been able to satisfy all the needs of the economics profession. It needs to be complemented with knowledge and skills from related disciplines, particularly business management and quantitative techniques. Nevertheless, economics should continue to be taught as a programme in universities to cater to the specific demand for knowledge and expertise in economics. A balanced approach towards economics education necessitates a thorough review of its fundamental aims and the epistemology of economics. In this regard, the teaching of economics has to incorporate more local realities while simultaneously addressing the changing global economic scenario as well as the paradigm shifts affecting economic development philosophy. Some conventional economic theories might be inappropriate to explain local complexities and the on-going changes. Understanding these intricacies will help economics graduates to grasp the strengths and weaknesses of the methods of economics while advancing the understanding of Malaysian economic realities.

Key words: economics education, scholastic function, epistemology of economics, development paradigm shift, globalisation

ABSTRAK

Pendidikan ekonomi universiti di Malaysia perlu menangani secara seimbang tiga fungsi utama, iaitu fungsi kerjaya, fungsi kesarjanaan dan fungsi pengembangan minda. Petunjuk pasaran memberi gambaran bahawa disiplin ekonomi kurang berupaya memenuhi kesemua keperluan kerjaya dan perlu dilengkapkan dengan ilmu dan kemahiran daripada disiplin lain, khususnya kuruns perniagaan dan teknik kuantitatif. Walaupun begitu, ekonomi harus dikekalkan sebagai satu program di universiti memandangkan wujudnya keperluan khusus untuk ilmu dan kemahiran ekonomi. Justeru, ketiga-tiga fungsi asas pendidikan ekonomi perlu diimbangi dan untuk itu, penelitian semula matlamat asas dan epistemologi ilmu ekonomi diperlukan. Diteliti daripada perspektif ini, pendidikan ekonomi seharusnya meningkatkan penerapan realiti setempat dengan mengambil kira realiti perubahan corak ekonomi global serta anjakan falsafah pembangunan ekonomi itu sendiri. Sebahagian teori ekonomi mungkin tidak sesuai untuk menghuraikan realiti setempat dan perubahan yang berlaku. Para pelajar perlu didedahkan kepada keterbatasan teori serta kaedah pengaplikasiannya. Dengan cara ini lulusan ekonomi diharapkan akan lebih berupaya untuk menghayati kekuatan dan kelemahan kaedah ekonomi di samping meningkatkan kefahaman mereka tentang realiti ekonomi Malaysia.

Kata kunci: pendidikan ekonomi, fungsi kesarjanaan, epistemologi ekonomi, perubahan paradigma pembangunan, globalisasi




Full Text:

PDF

References


Chakravarty, S. 1986. The Teaching of Economics in India. Economic and Political Weekly 21 (27): 1165-68.

Chee, Stephen. 1991. Philosophy and Objectives of Undergraduate Economics Programmes: The University of Malaya Approach. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 28 (142): 33-42.

Colander, D. 1999. Teaching Keynes in the 21 "Century. Journal of Economic Education Fall: 364-371.

Faculty of Economics and Administration (FEA). 1966. Report of the Board of Studies Approved by Senate. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

Gregorowicz, P , dan Hegji, C.E. 1998. Economics in the MBA Curriculum: Some Preliminary Survey Results. Journal of Economic Education. Winter 1998 issue: 81-87.

H. Osman Rani. 1997. Universiti dan Kemampuannya untuk Memenuhi Keperluan dan Prioriti Yang Berubah. Dalam A. Majid Salleh et al. Pascasidang Seminar Kebangsaan Program Ekonomi di Universiti: Satu Penilaian Semula. Kuala Lumpur: Fakulti Ekonomi, UKM & Persatuan Ekonomi Malaysia.

Idris Jajri, Pazim Osman, Kwek Kian Teng & Noor Azira. 1997. Requirements of Economics Graduates by the Public Sector - A Survey. Dalam A. Majid Salleh et. al. Pascasidang Seminar Kebangsaan Program Ekonomi di Universiti: Satu Penilaian Semula. Kuala Lumpur: Fakulti Ekonomi, UKM & Persatuan Ekonomi Malaysia.

Lin See Yan & Awang Adek Hussin. 1991.Graduates in Economics and Related Disciplines: Recent Experiences and the Needs of the Financial Sector- A User Perspective. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 28 (142): 63-74.

Mansor Ibrahim & Mohamed Aslam Heneef. 2000. The End of the Bachelor of Economics? An Analysis of An Economics Program at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. Dlm. Rahmah Ismail & Faridah Shahadan (ed.). Pancasidang Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Ekonomi di Persimpangan Jalan. Bangi: Fakulti Ekonomi, UKM.

Mohamad Alias & H. Osman Rani. 1991. The UKM Approach. Kertas dibentangkan di seminar "National Seminar on Economic Education: The Quality of Made-In- Malaysia Economists", Kuala Lumpur

Mohamad Alias, A. Majid Salleh, Mansor Iusoh & A . Hassan Shaari. 1997. Keperluan Siswazah Ekonomi oleh Sektor Swasta Satu Tinjauan. Dalam A. Majid Salleh et al. Pascasidang Seminar Kebangsaan Program Ekonomi di Universiti: Satu Penilaian Semula. Kuala Lumpur: Fakulti Ekonomi, UKM & Persatuan Ekonomi Malaysia.

Mohamad Alias, Norghani Md. Nor & Jamal Othman. 2000. Keperluan Siswazah Ekonomi oleh Sektor Swasta. Dlm. Rahmah Ismail & Faridah Shahadan (ed.). Pancasidang Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidiknn Ekonomi di Persimpangan Jalan. Bangi: Fakulti Ekonomi, UKM.

Shymala Nagaraj, Lee Kiong Hock & Koh Kim Leng. 1991. Economics Graduates in the Workplace: A Survey. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 28 (142): 87-113.

Shahril A. Karim. 1991. Teaching of Economics in Malaysia. Paper presented at the National Seminar on "Economic Education: The Quality of Made-In-Malaysia Economists", Kuala Lumpur.

Siegfried, 1. 1. 1999. Trends in Undergraduate Economics Degrees, 1997-1998. Journal of Economic Education 30(3):325-28.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694