Sikap Terhadap Cukai dari Perspektif Gender (Gender Differences of Attitudes Towards Taxation)

NORSIAH AHMAD (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, norsiah@ukm.my)

Abstract


This research note attempts to look into gender differences of attitudes towards taxation. Many research on attitudes focus on gender issues as an important subject due to its perceived differences. Gender differences are believed to influence ethical behavior as many researchers find that women are more ethical than men in decision-making. However, the finding of this research shows that there is no difference in terms of gender in attitudes towards taxation based on three tested attitudes constructs. The result shows that there are no attitude differences between male and female on the tax issues, therefore gender differences factor can be ignored in the context of tax planning by the state.

ABSTRAK

Nota penyelidikan ini cuba meninjau perbezaan sikap individu terhadap cukai di antara gender. Dalam kebanyakan kajian berkenaan sikap, isu gender telah menjadi satu subjek yang penting disebabkan perbezaan-perbezaan yang dianggap terlahir olehnya. Perbezaan gender juga dipercayai mempengaruhi perlakuan etika di mana kebanyakan hasil kajian lepas mendapati wanita lebih beretika dalam pembuatan keputusan berbanding lelaki. Walau bagaimanapun, hasil kajian ini mendapati tidak terdapat perbezaan dari perspektif gender berkaitan sikap terhadap cukai berdasarkan tiga konstruk sikap yang diuji. Hasil kajian ini menggambarkan tiada perbezaan sikap terhadap isu-isu cukai di antara lelaki dan wanita. Maka, faktor perbezaan gender boleh diabaikan dalam konteks perancangan cukai oleh negara.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alm, J., McClelland, G. H. & Schulze, W. D. 1999. Changing the Social Norm of Tax Compliance by Voting. Kyklos 52(2): 141-169.

Eriksen, K. & Fallan, L. 1996. Tax Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Taxation: A Report On a Quasi-Experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology 17: 387-402.

Fallan, L. 1999. Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 18: 173-184.

Fraser, A. M., Lytle, R. & Stolle, C. 1978. Profile of Female Accounting Majors: Academic Performance and Behavioral Characteristics. The Women CPA. Oktober: 18-21.

Glover, S. H., Bumpus, M. A., Sharp, G. F. & Munchus, G. A. 2002. Gender Differences in Ethical Decision Making. Women in Management Review 17(5): 217-27.

Jackson, B. R. & Milliron, V. C. 1986. Tax Compliance Research: Findings, Problems, and Prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature 5: 125-165.

Malaysia. 1998-2002. Laporan Tenaga Kerja. Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia.

Larkins, E. R., Hume, E. C. & Garcha, B. S. 1994. The Validity of the Randomized Response Method in Tax Ethics Research. Journal of Applied Business Research 13(3): 25-32.

Lewis, A. 1982. The Psycology of Taxation. Martin Robertson. Oxford.

Marvin, S. & Bryans, P. 1999. Gender on the agenda in management education? Women in Management Review 14(3): 99-104.

Mustafa. 1998. Self-Assessment System: Some Lessons for the Malaysian Individual Taxpayers. The Malaysian Accountant. 2-7.

Norsiah Ahmad. 2002. Effect of Tax Knowledge on Attitudes Towards Taxation. Collected Papers of AAAA2002 in Nagoya. Graduate School of Economic. Nagoya University. Japan. 221-30.

Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. Ed. ke-2. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pfeifer, P. & Shapiro, S. J. 1982. Male and Female MBA Candidates: Are There Personality Differences? The Business Quarterly, Spring: 77-80.

Robiah Sidin. 2000. Pembangunan Pendidikan dan Wanita: Cabaran Perancangan. Siri Syarahan Perdana Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694