Hypermedia Literacy: An Insight into English as a Foreign Language Online Reading Processes (Literasi Hypermedia: Suatu Penelitian Proses Pembacaan atas Talian dalam Bahasa Inggeris Sebagai Bahasa Asing)

Hazita Azman, Sepideh Mirzaeifard, Zaini Amir


The advent of the Internet has generated new ways of reading for knowledge, suggesting that digital literacy is a necessity for students of this new era. Even so, there is still a dearth of knowledge in the field that can provide rich theoretical descriptions of online reading processes of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) readers in the hypertext environment. This article elucidates the perceptual learning strategies and the metacognitive reading strategies of English as a Foreign Language students in hypertext reading environment. Their perceived preferred practices were elicited through a questionnaire and interviews, while actual observed online behaviours were recorded with Camtasia Studio 7. Based on these data sources, patterns of reading hypermedia texts on an online reading platform were identified and compared using NVivo 9. The findings indicated that the students’ perceived as well as their preferred learning styles and metacognitive reading strategies were mostly not performed or applied by them when they were engaged in the actual hypermedia reading environment. These differences in behaviours were contributed to the reading tasks and hypermedia tools made available by the platform facilitating their reading processes. Most significantly, the study revealed that the types of hypermedia tool available enabled them to modify their previously preferred practices for other ways of reading and comprehending the hypermedia texts. Moreover, the findings have also implied that students reading hypermedia texts online can develop different choices of sensory pathways unique to digital literacy environments. Thus the findings are significant as they contribute towards the currently limited knowledge about electronic literacy and online reading processes.

Keywords: Hypermedia reading; hypertext; EFL learning styles; online reading strategies; digital literacy


Kemunculan Internet telah menghasilkan cara baru untuk membaca dan mengakses pengetahuan, sekaligus menggariskan literasi digital sebagai satu keperluan hakiki pelajar era baru kini. Sungguh pun begitu ilmu serta teori mantap yang memberi penerangan kukuh berkenaan proses pembacaan dan kefahaman pelajar bahasa Inggeris-sebagai-bahasa asing dalam persekitaran hiperteks ini masih kurang mantap. Artikel ini menghuraikan persepsi berkenaan laluan deria dan strategi metakognitif pelajar berkenaan semasa membaca hiperteks atas talian. Kedua-dua persepsi amalan pilihan mereka serta tingkah laku sebenar yang diperhatikan berlaku semasa mereka membaca teks hipermedia atas talian, telah dikenalpastikan dan dibandingkan. Persepsi amalan dalam proses membaca dicungkil melalui soal selidik dan sesi temuduga, sementara tingkah laku sebenar semasa membaca atas talian dirakam melalui Camtasia Studio 7.  Berdasarkan sumber data ini, corak membaca teks hipermedia atas talian telah dianalisis mengguna Nvivo 9. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pelajar tidak menggunakan gaya pembelajaran dan strategi metakognitif membaca seperti mengikut persepsi mereka, semasa melakukan pembacaan hipermedia atas talian yang sebenar. Perbezaan persepsi dan tingkah laku sebenar telah berlaku akibat kesan dari jenis tugasan bacaan yang diberi dan juga alat hipermedia yang disediakan. Paling ketara, kajian menunjukkan bahawa amalan strategi yang menjadi pilihan biasa kepada pembaca diubah suai untuk membantu mereka memahami teks hipermedia dengan lebih berkesan dan efisyen. Justeru itu adanya alat-alat hipermedia dalam platform bacaan atas talian, proses laluan deria seorang pengguna bahasa Inggeris-sebagai-bahasa asing boleh berubah mengikut persekitaran literasi digital yang dibentuk. Oleh itu dapatan kajian ini amatlah bermakna kerana ia menyumbang kepada pengetahuan literasi elektronik dan proses pembacaan atas talian.

Kata kunci: bacaan hipermedia; hiperteks; gaya pembelajaran bahasa Inggeris sebagai bahasa asing; bacaan atas talian; literasi digital

Full Text:



Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. Y. 2010. Determining and describing reading strategies: Internet and traditional forms of reading. In Metacognition, strategy use and instruction, edited by H.S. Waters & W. Schneider, 201-225. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Affendi Hamat, Nor Fariza Mohd Nor, Hazita Azman, Nadzrah Abu Bakar & Noorizah Mohd Noor. 2010. iELLS: A research based online interactive literacy system. International Journal of Educational and Information Technologies 3(4): 165-173. http://www.naun.org/journals/educationinformation. Retrieved on: 15 September 2015.

Anderson, N. J. 2005. L2 Strategy research. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Carusi, A. 2006. A comparison of hypertext theory and phenomenology of reading. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5(2):163-180.

Coiro, J. & Dobler, E. 2007. Exploring the online reading compehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading ResearchQuarterly 42(2):214-257.

Coiro, J. 2011. Predicting reading comprehension on the internet: Contribution of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research 43(4): 352-392.

Coiro, J. 2015. Purposeful, critical and flexible: Key dimensions of online reading and learning. In Reading at a Crossroads? Disjuntures and Continuities in Current Conceptions and Practices, edited by Spiro et al., 53-64. NY: Routledge Press

Dorney, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Driscoll, M. P. 2005. Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Boston: Pearson.

Dryden, L. M. 1994. Literature, Student-Centered Classrooms, and Hypermedia Environments. In Literacy and Computers: The Complications of Teaching and Learning with Technology, edited by C. L. Selfe an S. Hilligoss, 282-304. NY: Modern Language Association.

Gervais, B. 2007. Is there a text on this screen? Reading in an era of hypertextuality. In A Companion to Digital Literacy Studies, edited by R. Siemens and S. Schreibman, 183-202. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Grabe, W. & Stroller, F. L. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. Harlow: Longman.

Hartman, D. K., Morsink, P. M., & Zheng, J. 2010. From print to pixel: The evolution of cognitive conceptions of reading comprehension. In The New Literacies: Multiple Perspectives on Research and Practice, edited by E. A. Baker, 131-164. New York, NY:Guilford Press.

Hazita Azman, Affendi Hamat, Nor Fariza Mohd Nor, Nadzrah Abu Bakar & Noorizah Mohd Noor, 2010. iELLS: Intelligent English Languag Literacy System. IP Copyright©2010. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Hsieh, P. H. & Dwyer, F. 2009. The instructional effect of online reading strategies and learning styles on student academic achievement. Educational Technology and Society 12(2): 36-50.

Konnikova, M. 2014. Being a better online reader. The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/being-a-better-onine-reader Retrieved on: 8 February 2016.

Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L. & Cammack, D. W. 2004. Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In Theoretical Models and Process of Reading, edited by Ruddell, R. B. & Unrau, N. J., 1570-1613. 5th Edition. International Reading Association.

Leu, D. J., Coiro, J., Castek, J., Hartman, D. K., Henry, L. A. & Reinking, D. 2008. Research on instruction and assessment in the new literacies of online reading comprehension. In Comprehension Instruction, Second Edition: Reaserch-Based Best Practices (Solving Problems in Teaching of Literacy), edited by Block, C. C. & Parris, S. R., 321-346. New York: Guilford Press.

Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. 2015. The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly 50(1): 37-59.

Lian, A. Y. G. 2011. ‘Youth-on-Youth’ Constructivist approach in virtual classroom across two cultures: A case study of Malaysia and American university students. Akademika 81(1): 63-72.

Mayer, R. E. 2010. Fostering scientific reasoning with multimedia instruction. In Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction, edited by Waters, H. S. & Schneider, W. 160-175. New York: Guildford Press.

Mohktari, K. & Sheorey, R. 2002. Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education 25(3): 2-10.

Nor Fariza Mohd Nor, Afendi Hamat, Hazita Azman, Nadzrah Abu Bakar & Noorizah Mohd Noor. 2009. iELLS: Researching reading strategies for designing online reading environment. European Journal of Social Sciences 9(3): 237-242.

Nowak, L., 2008. Digital reading theory and its relationship to academic reading practices. Essays on the Design of Electronic Text, 1(1), 1-7, University of Toronto. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca. Retrieved on: 11 January 2016.

Oxford, R. L. 2003. Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. IRAL 41(4): 271-278.

Pandian, A. & Baboo, S. B. 2015. Digital lifeworlds and designers of literacy practices in Malaysian schools. In A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning by Design, edited by Cope, B. & Kalantzis, 231-225. Basingstoke, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.

Patterson, N. G. 2000. Hypertext and the changing roles of readers. The English Journal 90(2): 74-80.

Pressley, M. 2000. What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. III, edited by Kamil, M, Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. & Barr, R., 545-561. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reid, J. M. 1995. Learning Style in ESL/EFL Classrooms. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Rumelhart, D. E. 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. In Attention and Performance IV, edited by S. Dornic, 573-603. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. 1982. An interactive activation model of context effect in letter perception: Part 2. Psychological Review 89: 60-94.

Sadler-Smith, E. 1996. Learning styles: A holistic approach. Journal of European Industrial Training 20(7): 29-36.

Tracey, D.H. & Morrow, L.M. 2006. Lenses on Reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York: Guildford Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.