ANDRAGOGY APPROACH IN CONDUCTING FORENSIC CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION: A SUMMARY OF TEACHING PRACTICE

Hanis Zainal Abidin NurWaliyuddin

Abstract


Like student-centred learning, andragogy is concerned with adult learning through self-directed learning, active participation, and collaborative problem-solving. While andragogy has been extensively recognised as a viable method for adult learning, its application presents several obstacles in higher-level education institutions. This article aims to demonstrate how to design and implement this andragogical strategy, particularly in Forensic Science programs. Specifically, this article discusses an andragogical approach to conducting a crime scene investigation as a course assignment. This activity starting with strategizing the teaching plan with students, setting up the crime scene, crime scene reconstruction, presentation of the investigation results, peer evaluation, and getting the student feedback. This activity is often used in Forensic Science programmes to provide students with hands-on experience in processing a crime scene, collecting evidence, and analysing evidence. Typically, instructors prepare crime scenes for students to investigate. Instead of providing a pre-constructed crime scene, students are given the opportunity to create and produce their own crime scenes. This indirectly demands dedication, group cooperation, and wisdom in applying all their knowledge and experience in Forensic Science. This activity provides space for creative thinking among students, especially in creating crime scenes, evaluating evidence materials, and reconstructing crime incidents using the obtained evidence. This article also highlights the need for obtaining student feedback, as well as the knowledge generated, and challenges faced by educators in applying andragogy in learning activities.


Keywords


Andragogy; crime scene; forensic investigation; problem-based learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kumar, M. K. (2016). Challenges of implementing student-centered strategies in classrooms. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 1224–1227.

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707–734.

Marín, V. I. (2022). Student-centred learning in higher education in times of COVID-19: A critical analysis. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 1-31

McKenna, S., & Quinn, L. (2020). Misconceptions and misapplications of student-centered approaches. In The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education (1st ed., pp. 109-120) London: Routledge.

Ngereja, B., Hussein, B., & Andersen, B. (2020). Does project-based learning (PBL) promote student learning? a performance evaluation. Education Sciences, 10(11), 330.

Reischmann, J. (2017). Lifewide learning – Challenges for Andragogy. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 1(1), 43–50.

Shin, M.-H. (2018). Effects of Project-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation and Self-Efficacy. English Teaching, 73(1), 95–114.

Wulf, C. (2019). “From teaching to learning”: Characteristics and challenges of a student-centered learning culture. Inquiry-Based Learning–Undergraduate Research: The German Multidisciplinary Experience, 47–55.

Xu, Y., & Liu, W. (2010). A project-based learning approach: a case study in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 363–370.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index