ENHANCING BIOLOGY STUDENTS' ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH AN INNOVATIVE STRATEGY IN UNIVERSITY CONTEXT: “REVOLUTION” STRATEGY

Elnaz Khataee, Elham Khataee, Mohammad Javad Khataee, Hanif Khademi

Abstract


This paper has arisen from diligent studies on the reading comprehension ability of biology students in the university EFL context. The purpose of the paper is to enhance biology students’ academic achievement in reading comprehension through an innovative strategy inspired from the word “REVOLUTION”. The strategy is introduced in the present paper and it is developed and implemented for the first time in reading comprehension instruction. To collect the relevant data, a questionnaire, interviews, reading comprehension texts and tests were used. Participants were 67 EFL learners studying plant biology at two universities in Iran. They were assigned into two groups of experimental and control. In the experimental group, the REVOLUTION strategy was used as a treatment in teaching reading comprehension, while in the control group, the teacher read out the text and asked students to listen, the teacher was supposed to answer the students' important questions. The main findings of the study showed that when the teacher applied the REVOLUTION strategy, the students had a much better performance on the reading comprehension tests. The conclusion to be drawn from this study is that the implementation of this strategy can be useful in improving the reading comprehension of university students, it enhances learners’ academic achievement in reading comprehension and also helps them to understand academic texts easily and effectively.


Keywords


Biology students, EFL context, reading comprehension, REVOLUTION strategy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, I., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Multiple Skills and Medium Enterprises’ Performance in Punjab Pakistan: A Pilot Study. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 7(4), 44-49.

Ahmadi, M., & Pourhossein, A. (2012). Reciprocal Teaching Strategies and Their Impacts on English Reading Comprehension. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(10), 2053-2060.

Ali, S. A. A. (2013). Study effects of school noise on learning achievement and annoyance in Assiut city, Egypt. Applied acoustics, 74(4), 602-606.

Altun, M. (2023). Suggestopedia: A Relaxed and Immersive Language Learning Environment. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(2), 278.

Altun, M., & Hussein, K. O. (2022). The impact of watching movies on students’ speaking ability. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(5), 14–31.

Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757-771). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Golbin, M. (2012). The effect of vocabulary size on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners."LiBRI. Linguistic and Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 1(2), 33-47.

Başar, M., & Gürbüz, M. (2017). Effect of the SQ4R technique on the reading comprehension of elementary school 4th grade elementary school students. International Journal of Instruction 10(2), 131-144.

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2014). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more important for some aspects of comprehension?. L’Année psychologique, 114(4), 647-662.

Castillo-Manzano, José I., Mercedes Castro-Nuño, Lourdes López-Valpuesta, María Teresa Sanz-Díaz, & Rocío Yñiguez. (2017). To take or not to take the laptop or tablet to classes, that is the question. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(1), 326-333.

Chang, M., Lyn, S., & Odette N. Gould. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 273-284.

Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. M. (2006). Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 509-525.

Gambrell, L. B., Malloy, J. A., & Mazzoni, S. A. (2011). Evidence-based best practices for comprehensive literacy instruction. Best practices in literacy instruction, 4, 11-56.

Gustanti, Y. & Ayu, M. (2021). The Correlation between Cognitive Reading Strategies and Students’ English Proficiency Test. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 95-100.

Hanifa, R. (2018). Factors generating anxiety when learning EFL speaking skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 230-239.

Harvey, S., & Goudvis. A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement. Stenhouse Publishers.

Herlina, J. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Bahasa Inggris Melalui Metode SQ4R. Visi PPTK PAUDNI, 11 (1), 1-13.

Hood, P. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 155.

Kalinic, Z., Arsovski, S., Stefanovic, M., Arsovski, Z., & Rankovic, V. (2011). The development of a mobile learning application as support for a blended e-Learning environment. Technics Technologies Education Management-Ttem, 6(4), 1345-1355.

Kaivanpanah, S., & H. Zandi. 2009. "The role of depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension in EFL contexts." Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 698-706.

Katemba, C. V., & Sihombing, N. M. (2023). Enhancing Students' Reading comprehension through Venn Diagram strategy And Know, Want, Learn (KWL) Strategy. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 8(1), 88-100.

Keshta, A. B. (2016). The Impact of using Jigsaw strategy on improving reading comprehension and communication skills among eleventh graders in Rafah. Unpublished Master’s thesis). The Islamic University–Gaza.

Khataee, E. (2018a). Reading failure among Iranian EFL learners: Study of underlying problems. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(3), 164-176.

Khataee, E. (2018b). Exploring the Effectiveness of Cultural Familiarity, Cultural Schemata and a Combination of Both. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(4), 01-06.

Khataee, E. (2019). The Effect of THIEVES Strategy on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 667-682.

Khusniyah, N. & Lustyantie, N (2017). Improving English Reading Comprehension Ability Through Survey, Questions, Read, Record, Recite, Review Strategy (SQ4R). English Language Teaching, 10 (12), 202-203.

Kuşdemir, Y., Düşünsel, C. M., & Çelik, M. (2018). “Investigation of summarization skills of primary school students”. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(2), 893-910.

Lestari, D. (2014). Wh-question in teaching narrative reading comprehension to junior high school students. e-journal, 3 (9), 19-31.

Mart, Ç.T. (2012). The Audio-Lingual Method: An easy way of achieving speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(6), 177-181.

Muijselaar, M., Swart, N., Steenbeek-Planting, E., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & De Jong,F. (2017). “Developmental Relations between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies”. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194-209.

Murphy, P. Karen, Ian AG Wilkinson, Anna O. Soter, Maeghan N. Hennessey, and John F. Alexander. 2009."Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis." Journal of educational psychology, 101(3), 740-752.

Nurie, Y. (2017). Pedagogical Practices in teaching reading Comprehension: A Case Study of Three EFL Teachers in a Secondary School in Ethiopia, PASAA, 109, 54-62.

Onyegegbu, N. (2002). Provision of facilities in biology classroom: New direction and challenges, Journal of Education Research, 4(1), 70-75.

O’reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2014). “Broadening the scope of reading comprehension using scenario-based assessments: Preliminary findings and challenges”. Dans L’Année Psychologique, 114(4), 693-723.

Poolman, B. G., Leseman, P. P. M., Doornenbal, J. M., & Minnaert, A. E. M. G. (2016).“Development of the language proficiency of five-to seven-year-olds in rural areas”. Early Child Development and Care, 1-22.

Rahmani, M., & Sadeghi, K., (2011). Effects of note-taking training on reading comprehension and recall. Reading, 11(2), 116-128.

Rashidi, N., & Farhani. F. (2010). "The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and Iranian EFL learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success." Sino-US English Teaching, 7 (7), 1-8.

Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal of English, 4(1), 65-79.

Saad, N. S., & Yunus, M. M. (2015). Environmental Conditions for English Language Learning in Malaysia. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1(3), 99-110.

Sase, A. S. (2014). The relationship between Prior Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5 (6), 125-131.

Seher, B. (2017). “Reading comprehension skills of bilingual children in turkey”. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(6), 1-18.

Seymour, S. "Walsh. L. (2006). Essentials of teaching academic reading.

Singh, M. K. M. (2019). Academic reading and writing challenges among international EFL Master’s students in a Malaysian university: The voice of lecturers. Journal of International Students, 9(4), 972-992.

Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240.

Wang, T. H. 2008. "The effects of modified Collaborative Strategic Reading on EFL learners’ reading comprehension." Unpublished MA dissertation, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.

Yuen, C. K., & Mussa, I. H. (2015). Academic writing difficulties of Iraqi postgraduate students in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(6), 25–34.

Yusuf, Natsir, & Hanum (2015). A Teacher's Experience in Teaching with Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique. International Journal of Instruction, 8 (2), 100-102.

Zhong, H. (2012). Multidimensional vocabulary knowledge: Development from receptive to productive use. Current Perspectives in Second Language Vocabulary Research, 23-55.

Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2014). “A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions”. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index