ESP VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION: A COMPARISON OF CBI VS. GTM FOR IRANIAN MANAGEMENT STUDENTS

Shima Ahmadi-Azad, Davoud Kuhi

Abstract


Vocabulary learning is an essential part of the language learning process. This study aimed at investigating the effects of two different methods of English for Specific Purpose (ESP) instruction, namely, the Content-based Instruction (CBI) and traditional Grammar Translation Method (GTM) on Iranian ESP students’ technical vocabulary learning. To this end, two intact classes of specialized English for management students in Gowgan Azad University were randomly assigned into two groups (N= 29 participants in each), and their homogeneity was confirmed by Comprehensive English Language Test. Group A was instructed based on CBI, while group B was instructed according to GTM principles.  The data were collected through a teacher made management vocabulary test which applied both as pre-test and post-test. Following a pre-test, the two groups received different instructions during 10 sessions, and then a post-test was given. The obtained data was analyzed using paired samples t-test to compare the effects of CBI and GTM on ESP vocabulary learning. The results indicated a significant propriety of CBI over GTM in improving vocabulary knowledge of the ESP students. Some justifications for this priority were discussed to be the ESP students’ more cognitive engagement and negotiation of meaning in a CBI based classroom.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alqahtani, M. 2015. The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3),21-34. DOI: 10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002

Amiri, M. & Hosseini Fatemi, A. 2014.The Impact of Content-based Instruction on Students’ Achievement in ESP Courses and Their Language Learning Orientation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4 (10), 2157-2167.

Boivin, N. & Razali, H. 2013. Content and language integration in the institute of teacher education – redesigning the EAP foundation programme. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research 9(2), 1–18.

Cammarata, L. 2016. Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cumming, J., & Lyster, R. 2016. Integrating CBI into high school foreign language classrooms. In L. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: For developing advanced thinking and literacy, pp. 77-97. New York, NY: Routledge.

Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. 2013. Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545–559. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000256.

Gaynor, B. 2013. Content-based instruction in Muroran institute of technology: A critical evaluation. Muroran institute of technology academic resources archive 11, 157–167.

Hedayatipanah, R. et al. 2015. The basic impact of tasked- based approach upon Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary enhancement in ESP classes. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 8 (1), 136-145.

Heo, Y. 2006. Content-based instruction. TESL Working Paper Series, 4(2), 25-32.

Jiangwen, W. & Binbin, W. 2011. The role of vocabulary in ESP teaching and learning. ELT Journal 27, 223-234.

Kavaliauskienë, G. & Kaminskienë, L. 2007. Translation as a learning tool in English for specific purposes. KALBOTYRA.57(3). Retrieved from http://www.kalbotyra.flf.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Kalbotyra_57_132-139-psl.pdf

Khalili, S., Tahririan, M. H., & Bagheri, S. 2015. Vocabulary Instruction through Blended Learning and Multimedia Software in Iranian ESP Classes. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 7(16), 37-54. Retrieved from http://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4409_252868f4984b2291cdeac2e11f267d8d.pdf

Larsen-Freeman, D & Anderson, M. 2000. Techniques & Priciples in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lyster, R., & Ballinger, S. 2011. Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language Teaching Research, 15 (3), 279-288.

Mahmoud, A. 2006. Translation and Foreign Language Reading Comprehension: A Neglected Didactic Procedure. English Teaching Forum, 44 (4), 28–33.

Malmir, A., Najafi Sarem, S., & Ghasemi, A. 2011. The effect of task-based language teaching (TBLT) vs. content-based language teaching (CBLT) on the Iranian intermediate ESP learners' reading comprehension. The Iranian EFL Journal 7(6), 79–94.

Mukoroli, J. 2011. Effective vocabulary teaching strategies for the English for academic purposes ESL Classroom. MA TESOL Collection. Paper 501 /online/. Retrieved from http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/ipp_collection/501

Natsir, M. & Sanjaya, D. 2014. Grammar Translation Method (GTM) Versus Communicative Language Teaching (CLT); A Review of Literature. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2 (1), 58-62.

Nguyen, T. C. N. 2011. Content-based Instruction in the Teaching of English for Accounting at Vietnamese College of Finance and Customs. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 90-100. Retrieved from www.ccsenet.org/elt

Rasekh, A. E, & Simin, S. 2011. Teaching English for specific purposes: A no man’s land area of activity: Investigating ESP courses administered in Iranian universities. English for Specific 40 Purposes World: Online Journal for Teacher,32. Retrieved from http://www.esp-world.info/ Articles_32/ DOC/Simin.pdf

Richard, J. C. & T. S. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. 2006. Communicative language teaching today. Retrieved from http://www.professorjack ichards.com.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approach and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sabzalipour, B. & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2015). ESP vocabulary instruction: The effect of using game-oriented teaching methods on Iranian ESP learners majoring in Psychology. Modern Journal of Language teaching Methods (MJLTM), 5(4), 624-628.

Sarani, A. and Farzaneh Sahebi, L. 2012. The Impact of Task-based Approach on Vocabulary Learning in ESP Courses. English Language Teaching; 5(10). 118-128.

Shabani, M. B. & Ghasemi, A. 2014. The Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) and Content-Based Language Teaching (CBLT) on the Iranian Intermediate ESP Learners' Reading Comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1713 – 1721.

Syananondh, K. 2011. A modified-sheltered and adjunct CBI in EFL Contexts: A Pre-Experimental Research Report. Journal of Humanities Naresuan University. Retrieved from www.human.nu.ac.th/jhnu/file/journal/2011_02_03_11_08_38-05.pdf

Tedick, D., & Wesley, P. 2015. A review of research on content-based foreign/second language education in US K-12 contexts. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28, 25–40.

Tozcui, A., & Coady, J. 2004. Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17 (5), 473–495.

Yang, W. 2016. ESP vs. CLIL: A coin of two sides or a continuum of two extremes? ESP today, 4(1), 43-68

Wang, Y. 2013. A Literature Review on Content ESL Instruction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 642-647.

Watts-Taffe, S., & Truscott, D. M. 2000. Using what we know about language and literacy development for ESL students in the mainstream classroom language. Language Arts, 77(3), 258-265.

Wesche, M. B., & Skehan, P. 2002. Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics, 207-228. New York: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index