POPULARITY OF VARIOUS TEACHING METHODS IN A POST-SECONDARY BIOLOGY CLASS OF A MALAYSIAN PRIVATE INSTITUTION

Ting Xiang Neik, Beng Kah Song, Paul Davidson

Abstract


This study aims to explore the popularity level of various teaching methods in a post-secondary Biology class of a Malaysian private institution. In a large class setting, the three teaching methods used in this study include animations, role play/kinesthetic and group discussion. The form of this study is quantitative response. Respondents are 63 Biology students enrolled in the Foundation in Science course at a local private institution during January 2012 in their final semester. Half of the topics in this subject (nine out of 18 topics), namely recombinant DNA technology and RNA transcription and translation processes were not taught before at secondary level. The quantitative data concerning popularity of the teaching methods whereby 1 is least popular and 5 most popular, were collected and analyzed using XLSTAT Version 2013.2.07. Results indicate that watching animation is the most popular method with highest number of respondents at 47.6% reporting a rating score of 5. Whereas, both group discussion and role play/kinesthetic methods report the same rating score of 4 with highest number of respondents at 39.7% and 38.9% respectively. Two-tailed t-test for two independent samples show that there is significant difference (α=0.05) in the rating score between animation and role play/kinesthetic method as well as animation and group discussion. Findings from this study imply that in-class activities do bring positive learning attitude. However, the activities should be well-planned and student learning profile assessed for effective student-centered learning at post-secondary education.

Keywords: Post-secondary; Malaysia; Biology new concepts; Teaching methods; Student feedback 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 262-268. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., . . . Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition (L. W. Anderson & D. R. Krathwohl Eds.): Pearson.

Anonymous a. (2014). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 Results in Focus - What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf

Anonymous b. (2012). Preliminary report of the National Education Blueprint Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng.pdf

Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using Student-Centred Learning Environments to Stimulate Deep Approaches to Learning: Factors Encouraging or Discouraging Their Effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. Retrieved from itslifejimbutnotasweknowit.org.uk/files/LSRC_LearningStyles.pdf‎

Colbert, J., Olson, J., & Clough, M. (2007). Using the Web to Encourage Student-generated Questions in Large-Format Introductory Biology Classes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6, 42-48. doi:10.1187/cbe.06–07–0171

Dunn, R. (1990). Understanding the Dunn and Dunn Learning Styles Model and the Need for Individual Diagnosis and Prescription. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6(3), 223-247. doi:10.1080/0748763900060303

Elliott, S. L. (2010). Efficacy of Role Play in Concert with Lecture to Enhance Student Learning of Immunology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 11. doi:doi:10.1128/jmbe.v11i2.211

Ibrahim, N. M., & Ramli, N. H. (2010). A comparative study on the learning styles of second year education (Living Skills) students and the teaching styles of their lecturers Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/11028/

Kumar, L. R., Voralu, K., Pani, S. P., & Sethuraman, K. R. (2009). Predominant Learning styles adopted by AIMST University students in Malaysia. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 37–46.

Osman, K., Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2006). What Malaysian Science Teachers Need to Improve their Science Instruction: A Comparison across Gender, Sschool Location and Area of Specialization. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 58-81.

Petty, G., & Brewer, E. (2011). Comparing Lecturing and Small Group Discussions. In V. C. X. Wang (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Communication Technologies and Adult Education Integration (pp. 396-414): IGI Global.

Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2011). Campbell Biology (9th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Benjamin-Cummings.

Rogers, R. R. (2001). Reflection in Higher Education: A Concept Analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37-57. doi:10.1023/A:1010986404527

Saleh, S., & Aziz, A. (2012). Teaching Practices Among Secondary School Teachers in Malaysia. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 47, 63–67. doi:doi:10.7763/IPEDR

Thomas, S., Subramaniam, S., Abraham, M., Too, L. S., & Beh, L. S. (2011). Trials of large group teaching in Malaysian private universities: a cross sectional study of teaching medicine and other disciplines. BMC Research Notes, 4. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-337

Tomanek, D., & Montplaisir, L. (2004). Students’ Studying and Approaches to Learning in Introductory Biology. Cell Biology Education, 3, 253–262. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-06-0041

Walker, J. D., Cotner, S. H., Baepler, P. M., & Decker, M. D. (2008). A Delicate Balance: Integrating Active Learning into a Large Lecture Course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7, 361–367. doi:10.1187/cbe.08–02–0004

Yazedjian, A., & Kolkhorst, B. B. (2007). Implementing Small-Group Activities in Large Lecture Classes. College Teaching, 55(4), 164–169.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index