Regularities and Irregularities in Rhetorical Move Structure of Linguistics Abstracts in Research Articles
Abstract
Awareness of abstract writing skill plays an important role for research article (RA) abstract writers to meet the discourse community expectations. In academic writing, writers should persuade readers to read the whole article by writing an effective abstract in terms of both content and rhetorical structure. This paper utilised Swales’ (1990) theory as considers abstract as an independent discourse because of its distinctive function and indicates the content and structure of the whole text. Swales also highlights the format of the abstract as having I-M-R-D pattern. The underlying assumption is that the associated RAs follow the IMRD structures and their abstracts are also likely to exhibit the same move pattern. This study investigated 130 English research article abstracts in linguistics journals in order to identify the move patterns found in RA abstracts in terms of moves and steps. In addition, it established move cycling in the structuring of an abstract. The findings indicated that 63.84% of the abstracts followed the IMRD structure that was premised to reflect the structure of the main text. Findings from this research provide new insights into abstract writing in linguistics articles, in particular, with regard to the actual practice in the use of the IMRD move patterns and how the related genres in RA are similar or different. These findings have pedagogical implications as writers could be given training in the various aspects of writing to satisfy the rhetorical structure for information flow.
Keywords: abstract; IMRD structure; move cycling; rhetorical move; step
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, U. (1997). Scientific research articles in Malay: a situated discourse analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Becher, T. & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonn, S. V. & Swales, J. M. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93-108.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 47–59.
Chan, S. H., Ebrahimi, S. F. (2012). Marked themes as context frames in research article abstracts. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 12(4), 1147-1164.
Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57-70.
Dahl, T. (2004). Some characteristics of argumentative abstracts. Akademisk Prosa, 2, 49–67.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 219-228). London: Routledge.
Hirano, E. (2009). Research article introductions in English for specific purpose: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 240-250.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 321-337.
Hopkins, T. & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion section in articles and dissertations. English for Specific
Purposes, 7,113-122.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.
ISO 214 - 1976 (E). International Organization for Standardization. Documentation – Abstracts for publications and documentation. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269-292.
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282‐309.
Loan, N. T. T., Qian, L., Linh, N. D., & Pramoolsook I. (2014). TESOL conference abstracts: Discrepancies between potential writers’ knowledge and actual composition. 3L: The Southeast Asian journal of English Language Studies, 30(3), 161-176.
Lores, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302.
Martin‐Martin, P. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purpose, 22(1), 25‐ 43.
Martín-Martín, P. (2005). The Rhetoric of the Abstract in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
Melander, B., Swales, J. M, & Fredrickson, K. M. (1997). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: national or disciplinary proclivities? In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 251–272). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 119-138.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479–497.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250.
Postegiullo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 139–160.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: a genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text, 10(4), 365–384.
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141-156.
Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–499.
Sauperl, A., Klasinc, J. & Luzar, S. 2008. Components of abstracts: logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1420-1432.
Stotesbury, H. (2006). Gaps and false conclusions: criticism in research article abstracts across the disciplines. In K. Hyland, & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic Discourse across Disciplines (42, pp. 123-148). New York: Peter Lang.
Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham, England: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Thompson, D. (1993). ‘Arguing for experimental ‘facts’ in science. A study of research article results section in biochemistry’. Written Communication, 19(1), 106-128.
Ventola, E. (1994). Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. In S. Čmejrková, F. Daneš, & E. Havlová (Eds.). Writing vs. speaking: language, text, discourse, communication, pp.333-352. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Williams, I. A. (1999). Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347–366.
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365–385.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157