This study addresses the research gap in doctor-death informant interactions within verbal autopsy (VA) contexts, examining these interactions as unequal encounters through institutional interaction research. The study aims to analyse the content, structure, and function of question-and-answer exchanges in VA interviews, explore conflicting frames, and identify opposing discursive strategies. It connects microanalysis to the broader sociocultural context, viewing VA as a regulatory practice reflecting local health unit procedures. Data were collected from 64 death informants and two rural municipal health physicians in Northern Leyte, Philippines. Interviews were conducted using WHO's Standardised Verbal Autopsy guide, and the interactions were transcribed and analysed for topic, question type, question-answer sequence, and alignment with institutional roles. The study reveals that doctors, as institutional authorities, control the interaction, with informants recognising this asymmetry through honorifics and apologies. Conflicting frames of expectations between doctors' objective questioning and informants' subjective responses lead to interactional struggles. These struggles are exacerbated by the informants' emotional instability, potentially compromising the reliability of death reports. The overwhelming VA process challenges doctors' decision-making capabilities, leading to the imposition of institutional authority. The study highlights the need for VA training that considers the psycho-socio-cultural contexts of informants to improve the quality of health information systems. Understanding interactional barriers and implementing research-based communication strategies can enhance doctor-informant relationships and institutional protocols. Policymakers might better address the need for context-sensitive VA training. Future research could explore variations in death reporting across different regions and the psychological experiences of doctors and informants.

Keywords: asymmetry of roles; frames of expectation; institutional talk; verbal autopsy

Alasuutari, P. (2023). Conversation analysis, institutions, and rituals. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1146448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1146448[1]

Bailo, P., Gibelli, F., Ricci, G., & Sirignano, A. (2022). Verbal autopsy as a tool for defining causes of death in specific healthcare contexts: Study of applicability through a traditional literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11749.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine

Billah, M. A., Islam, M. Z., Chowdhury, R., Shafique, S., Sarker, B. K., Bhuiyan, M. M. A., Alam, S. S., Kim, M., Matin, M. Z., Jahangir, M. A., Ferdous, J., Vandenent, M., Alam, M. A. R., Hanifi, S. M. A., Razzaque, A., & Rahman, A. (2024). Causes of under-five mortality using verbal autopsies in urban slum areas in Bangladesh: a cross-

sectional analysis of surveillance data. Journal of Global Health Reports, 8. https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.117622

Boxer, D. (2002). Applying Sociolinguistics: Domains and Face-to-face Interaction. Amsterdam. John Benjamins Publishing Corporation.

Canagarajah, A. S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 601-626.

Chan, M. Y., Chin, S., & Seng, H. Z. (2019). Doing legitimacy in talk: The production of leader- follower relationship in spiritual consultation interactions. Sage Open, 1-11.

Coates, J. (2003). Men talk. Stories in the making of masculinities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Cities and Municipalities Competitive Index. (2024). Retrieved from https://cmci.dti.gov.ph/lgu- profile.php?lgu=Barugo on May 28, 2024.

Davis, D. L. (2010). Simple but not always easy: Improving doctor-patient communication. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 3(3-4), 240-245.

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analysing Talk at Work: An Introduction. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ekström, M., & Stevanovic, M. (2023). Conversation analysis and power: Examining the descendants and

antecedents of social action. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1196672.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman.

Farkas, K. R. H. (2012). Citizen (in) action: the limits of civic discourse in city council meetings. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(1), 81–98.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Harvard University Press.

Gordon, C. (2015). Framing and Positioning. In D.Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (pp.324-345.) US:Wiley-Blackwell.

Hamzah, H., & Wong, F. F. (2018). Miscommunication in pilot-controller interaction. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(4), 199-213.

Hassan, W., Thalho, N. P., & Mehboob, Y. (2021). Professional and Institutional Discourse: A Case Study of Media Discourse. International Journal of English Language Studies, 3(3), 16–25.

Haworth, K. (2006). The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. Discourse & Society, 17(6), 739-759.

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hodge, S. (2005). Participation, discourse and power: A Case Study in Service User Involvement. Critical Social Policy Ltd. 25(2), 164-179.

Kawashima, M. (2018). ‘Mitori’ practices at a Japanese Hospital: Interactional analysis of the processes of death and dying in Japan. Discourse Studies, 21(2), 159-179.

King, C., Zamawe, C., Banda, M., Bar-Zeev, N., Beard, J., Bird, J., Costello, A., Kazembe, P., Osrin, D., & Fottrell, E. (2016). The quality and diagnostic value of open narratives in verbal autopsy: a mixed-methods analysis of partnered interviews from Malawi. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0115-5

Klein, G. C. (2018). On the Death of Sandra Bland: A Case of Anger and Indifference. Sage Open, 8(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018754936

Mahesh, B. P. K., Hart, J. D., Acharya, A., Chowdhury, H. R., Joshi, R., Adair, T., & Hazard, R. H. (2022). Validation studies of verbal autopsy methods: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2215. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14628-1.

Mahon, P., & McPherson, G. (2014). Explaining why nurses remain in or leave bedside nursing: A critical ethnography. Nurse Researcher, 22(1), 8-13.

Maynard, D., & Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis, Doctor–patient interaction, and medical communication. Medical Education, 39, 428–435.

McLean, C., Coombs, M., & Gobbi, M. (2016). Talking about persons - Thinking about patients: An ethnographic study in critical care. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 54, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.011

Morales-López, E., Prego-Vázquez, G., & Domínguez-Seco, L. (2005). Interviews between employees and customers during a company restructuring process. Discourse & Society, 16(2), 225-268.

O’Reilly, M., Kiyimba, N., Nina Lester, J., & Muskett, T. (2020). Reflective interventionist conversation analysis. Discourse & Communication, 14(6), 619-634.

Prego-Vazquez, G. (2007). Frame conflict and social inequality in the workplace: professional and local discourse struggles in employee/customer interactions. Discourse & Society, 18(3), 295-335.

Surek-Clark, C. (2020). Verbal autopsy interview standardisation study: A report from the field. In V. Petit & others (Eds.), The anthropological demography of health (online edn). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862437.003.001

Ten Have, P. (2002). The Notion of Member is the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.834

Todd, A. (1983). A diagnosis of doctor-patient discourse in the prescription of contraception. In S. Fisher & A. D. Todd (Eds.), The social organisation of doctor-patient communication (pp. 159-188). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Tracy, K., & Robles, J. (2009). Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction. Discourse Studies, 11(2), 131–152.

World Health Organisation. (2010). Improving the quality and use of birth, death, and cause of death information: Guidance for a standards-based review of country practices. Albany.

World Health Organisation. (2024). Verbal autopsy standard-World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/other-classifications/verbal-autopsy-standards-ascertaining-and-attributing-causes-of-death-tool