Understanding Oriental and Western Dragons in a Globalised World: A Cross-linguistic Study of Dragon-based Metaphorical Expressions in Chinese and English

Meow Ee Chew, Lay Shi Ng, Nurjanah Mohd Jaafar, Chun Keat Yeap

Abstract


Animal metaphors are widely utilised across diverse linguistic landscapes and transcend cultural boundaries. This paper examines the relationship between culture and linguistic expressions by analysing metaphors in the idioms and proverbs of two typologically different languages: Chinese and English. The objective is to explore the variations in the use of the dragon as a conceptual metaphor in these two languages. Data were collected from two online platforms: Chinese-Tools.com and The Free Dictionary. A comparative analysis was performed, structured in several steps: data organisation and categorisation, followed by quantitative and qualitative analyses and concluded with a cross-cultural comparison. This methodology allowed for the identification of similarities and differences in dragon-based metaphorical expressions. A conceptual mapping model was also used to examine the variations between Chinese and English in conceptualising the human domain using dragons as the source domain. The findings reveal that the mapping of dragon characteristics onto human beings varies, encompassing behaviours, appearances, and intellectual competency. Chinese dragon metaphors generally carry positive meanings, while negative meanings are more prominent in English dragon metaphors. This contrast can be attributed to the dragon’s representation as an auspicious creature symbolising power and wisdom in Chinese culture, whereas it is associated with malevolence and destruction in English culture. These findings have implications for cross-cultural communication and understanding, especially as the world becomes increasingly interconnected through globalisation. The exchange and adaptation of cultural symbols, including metaphors, have accelerated across linguistic and cultural boundaries.

 

Keywords: dragon; metaphor; conceptual metaphor; Chinese; English


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baider, F., & Gesuato, S. (2003). Masculinist metaphors, feminist research. The Online Journal Metaphorik, de, 5, 6-25.

Briggs, K. (2002). British folk tales and legends: A Sampler. Routledge.

Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture? In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5-25). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Emanatian, M. (1995). Metaphor and the expression of emotion: The value of cross-cultural perspectives. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 163-182.

Emanatian, M. (1996). Everyday metaphors of lust and sex in Chagga. Ethos, 24(2), 195-236.

Fontecha, A. F., & Catalán, R. M. J. (2003). Semantic derogation in animal metaphor: A contrastive-cognitive analysis of two male/female examples in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 771-797.

Goatly, A. (2006). Humans, animals and metaphors. Society and animals, 14(1), 15–37.

Hann, M. A. (2013). Symbol, pattern & symmetry: The cultural significance of structure. Bloomsbury.

Hogan, P. C. (2003). Cognitive science, literature, and the arts: a guide for humanists. Routledge.

Kövecses, Z. (1997). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Second Edition. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press.

Liu, J. (2013). A comparative study of English and Chinese animal proverbs-from the perspective of metaphors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(10), 1844–1849.

López Maestre, M. D. (2009). Immigration and conceptual metaphors: A critical approach to ideological representation. In R. G. Morón, M. P. Cruz, L. F. Amaya, & M. O. H. López (Eds.), Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics (pp. 60-87). Cambridge

Scholars Publishing.

Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook. Greenwood Press.

Salehuddin, K. (2022). Exploring three idealised cognitive models in the Kampung Boy and Budak Kampung. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 28(2), 140-159.

Sarwark, R. M. (2024). The dragon in world mythology and culture. McFarland.

Steen, G. (2002). Identifying metaphor in language: A cognitive approach. Style, 36(3), 386–407.

Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. Routledge.

Talebinejad, M. R., & Dastjerdi, H. V. (2005). A cross-cultural study of animal metaphors: When owls are not wise! Metaphor and Symbol, 20(2), 133-150.

Thi, V. (2019). An analysis of animal idioms in English for translation in the light of cognitive linguistics. International Journal of Science and Research. 8(5), 1128–1134.

Thibodeau, P. H., Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). How linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 852-863.

Wei, L., & Wong, B. E. (2012). A corpus-based study on snake metaphors in Mandarin Chinese and British English. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 311–324.

Wen, X., & Chen, C. (2021). Cultural conceptualisations of loong (龙) in Chinese idioms. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 19(2), 563-589.

Xu, Z., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Cultural conceptualizations of Chinese zodiac animals in Chinese English. World Englishes, 37(4), 590–606.

Ying, Y., Mursitama, T. N., & Rumeser, J. A. A. (2017). Comparison of animal idioms in Chinese and Indonesian. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1167–1170.

Zhao, Q. G. (1992). A study of dragons, East and West. Asian thought and culture. Peter Lang.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/2024-3004-01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157