Do Modern Arab Televangelists Argue or Preach? A Pragma Dialectical Analysis of Mustafa Husni's Live the Moment TV Show

Nahla Mounir, Salwa Mohamed Farag, Mona Fouad Attia

Abstract


Modern Arab didactic TV shows are widely categorised as religious; however, most of them target social issues from different perspectives to ensure a persuasive impact on a broad audience, specifically the youth. Despite their significance, almost no research has been conducted to determine the remarkable features of this genre. Therefore, this study aims to reveal the argumentative features of Arab didactic TV shows and investigate their preaching and persuasive functions. Four episodes from Mustafa Husni's (2014) Live the Moment show were randomly selected, downloaded from Husni's YouTube Channel, and manually transcribed. Following a qualitative-quantitative approach, the researchers translated selected examples and quantified the frequencies of the argumentative aspects utilised in the show, which were then descriptively analysed in terms of the pragma-dialectical theory (van Eemeren et al., 1996, 2002). The study findings indicated that the remarkable macro-structure features include the domination of the argumentation stage, the implicitness of both the confrontation and opening stages, and the absence of the conclusion stage due to the show's monologue nature. Moreover, the most frequent micro-structure argumentation elements are the coordinative and multiple structures and the causal and symptomatic schemes, respectively, for their persuasive and didactic functions. The study contributes to interdisciplinarity by enhancing the understanding of pragma-dialectics, uncovering the persuasive features of argumentation in this genre, and boosting the media literacy of producers of awareness-raising TV shows.

 

Keywords: Argumentation stages; argumentation schemes; argumentation structures; didactic TV shows; Pragma-dialectics


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Al Khanaifsawy, A. N. (2021). A Pragma-Dialectical Study of David Hare’s ‘Stuff Happens. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 136–186. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/2617

Ashmawi, G. A. A. (2012). Argumentation in the Niqab Ban Issue in France in English and Arabic Written Media Discourse. Philology, 57, 136–184.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Barth, E. M., & Krabbe, E. C. (1978). Formele dialectiek: instrumenten ter beslechting van conflicten over geuite meningen [Formal dialectics: Instruments for the resolution of conflicts avowed opinions]. Spektator, 7(5-6), 307-341.

Castro, W. F., & Toro, J. A. (2023). Mathematics teacher argumentation in a didactic perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), 23-22. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13498

Echchaibi, N. (2011). Gendered Blueprints: Transnational Masculinities in Muslim Televangelist Cultures. In Hegde R. S. (ed.). Circuits of Visibility: Gender and Transnational Media Cultures. New London: New York University Press.

Franke, L. (2023). Islamic Ideals, the Concept of Love, and Processes of Individualisation: Muṣṭafā Ḥusnī’s Writings and his Spiritual Brand. In S. Wippel (Ed.), Branding the Middle East: Communication Strategies and Image Building from Qom to Casablanca (pp. 275–290). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hashmi, U. M., Shahzad, M., Rashid, R. A., Almekhlafy, S. S. A., Malik, M. Y., & Hashmi, H. A. (2022). Former Muslims' Socio-Religious Discourse on Social Media: A Speech Acts Analysis. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 28(4), 197-211. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2804-14

Henkemans, A. F. (2001). Argumentation Structures. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (pp. 101–134). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Houtlosser, P. (2001). Points of view. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (pp. 27-50). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Husni, M. (Writer), & Abdel-Rasool, H. (Director). (2014). لحظة انفصال "طلاق" (Episode 24) [Didactic TV Show]. In عيش اللحظة. Boraq Media; An-Nahar Channel. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/4wBGpwo4abU?feature=shared

Husni, M. (Writer), & Abdel-Rasool, H. (Director). (2014). لحظة عمل الخير (Episode 20) [Didactic TV Show]. In عيش اللحظة. Boraq Media; An-Nahar Channel. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/fZEDC8cjQfo?feature=shared

Husni, M. (Writer), & Abdel-Rasool, H. (Director). (2014). لحظة فرحة (Episode 10) [Didactic TV Show]. In عيش اللحظة. Boraq Media; An-Nahar Channel. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/dMdzhD_Zdmo?feature=shared

Husni, M. (Writer), & Abdel-Rasool, H. (Director). (2014). لحظة قلق وتوتر (Episode 4) [Didactic TV Show]. In عيش اللحظة. Boraq Media; An-Nahar Channel. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/FajY97t5IWI?feature=shared

Jamil, S. N. M. (2023). 'Remember our race, our religion and our progeny': An argumentation analysis of Malay-language newspapers during general election campaigns. In K. Rajandran and C. Lee (Eds.), Discursive Approaches to Politics in Malaysia, Asia in Transition (18, pp. 139–162). Institute of Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5334-7_8

Keating, M. (2021). The Pragma-Dialectics of Dispassionate Discourse: Early Ny¯aya Argumentation Theory. Religions, 12, 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100875.

Liepina, R., Wyner, A., Sartor, G., & Lagioia, F. (2023). Argumentation schemes for legal presumption of causality. ICAIL 2023 (pp. 157-166). https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595130

Lorenzen, P. (1969). Normative logic and ethics. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institute.

Quran. (2023). Quran.com (Version 1.20.3) [Mobile app]. App Store. https://apps.apple.com/eg/app/quran-by-quran-com-%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A2%D9%86/id1118663303

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smolka, J. (2022). Argumentation in the Interpretation of Statutory Law and International Law: Not Ejusdem Generis. Languages, 7, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020132

Svačinová, I. (2021). Pragma‑Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary‑Writing As a Communicative Activity Type. Argumentation, 35, 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09524-0

van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Berlin/Dordrecht: Walter de Gruyter/Foris.

van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Henkemans, F. S. (Eds.). (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. London/New York: Routledge.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Henkemans, F. S. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative Indicators: A Pragma-Dialectical Study. The Netherlands: Springer.

van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Kruiger, T. (1987). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2025-3103-06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157