Eco-linguistics is a thriving research field which integrates the language-environment nexus in an interdisciplinary array of dimensions. Nevertheless, the linguistic analysis of ecopoetics in Pakistani context is an underexplored domain of inquiry. The present research scrutinises the linguistic pattern of literary environmental text, which employs the poetic register to deal with the subject of the human-nature interface, and the construction of ecocritical framing within its specific context. The poem, The Arrival of Monsoon (1985) by Taufiq Rafat, is selected as it fulfills Buell (1995)’s criteria of ‘Environmental Text’. The poem is analysed first in terms of processes and circumstances using Halliday’s model of transitivity analysis and then employing Arran Stibbe’s concept of ecological framing to unveil its system of meanings. The results demonstrate the foregrounding of material actions and events in the text. The selected poem’s text has an explicit emphasis on the existence and characteristics of Nature in comparison to human beings and this is achieved categorically with circumstances of location. These circumstances of location hold significant cultural images and thus help in assigning the text its ecosensitive stance while locating it within a specific cultural context i.e., Pakistan. The dualistic frame of Nature being both invigorating and dominating is manifested in the poem. The study will be significant to emerging writers, teachers and students who want to explore the themes of human-nature interaction in their writings.

Keywords: Ecolinguistics; transitivity analysis; environmental texts; circumstances of location; ecological framing

Abbamonte, L. (2021). The “sustainable” video-narratives of Greenpeace: An ecolinguistic investigation. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 57(2), 145–185.

Alves, V. (2021). Poesia na prosa: A dobra ecolinguística no jornalismo literário contemporâneo [Poetry in prose: The ecolinguistic fold in contemporary literary journalism]. Filol. Linguíst, 23(1), 105–124.

Bryson, J. (2002). Introduction. In J. Scott Bryson (Ed.), Ecopoetry. A Critical Introduction Salt Lake City (pp. 1-13). University of Utah Press.

Buell, L. (1995). The environmental imagination. Harvard University Press.

Buell, L. (2005). The future of environmental criticism. Blackwell.

Carter, R. & Stockwell, P. (2008). The language and literature reader. Routledge.

Chen, W., Bartlett, T. & Peng, H. (2021). The erasure of nature in the discourse of oil production: An enhanced eco-discourse analysis. Pragmatics and Society, 12(1), 6–32.

Cheng, M & He, W. (2021). News reports about the Sino-US trade war: An ecolinguistic approach. Journal of World Languages, 7(3), 428–460.

Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle: Nature, man, and technology. Random House Inc.

Coupe, L. (2000). The green studies reader: From romanticism to ecocriticism. Routledge.

Couto, H. (2021). A linguagem rural da região de Major Porto, município de Patos de Minas (MG): Uma visão linguístico-ecossistêmica [The rural language of the region of Major Porto, municipality of Patos de Minas-MG: An

ecosystemic-linguistics view]. Campinas: Pontes editores.

Couto, et al., (2021). Um ecosystemic discourse analysis (EDA). Ecolinguística: Revista Brasileira de Ecologia e Linguagem (ECO-REBEL), 7(1), 5–17.

Dragoescu, A. (2021). Restoring the meaning of food: Biosemiotic remedies for the nature/culture divide. In Yogi Hale Hendlin & Jonathan Hope (Eds.), Food and medicine: A biosemiotic perspective (pp. 97–113). Springer.

Farooq, W & Umar, H. (2021). The deletion of the human agent in environmental science discourse: An ecolinguistic study. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics & Literature, 5(II), 89–111.

Fernández-Vázquez, José-Santiago. (2021). Measuring environmental website communications in Latin American universities: Multimodal and ecolinguistic benchmarking. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher

Education, 22(3), 599–614.

Fine, J. & Nichols, J. (2021). Language and climate justice: A research agenda. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25(3), 453–473.

Halliday, M. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: An Inquiry into the language of William Golding’s the inheritors. In Chatman, S. (Ed.), Literary style: A symposium (pp. 330- 368). Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. In Halliday, M. and Matthiessen, C. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: a language-based approach to cognition. Continuum.

Halliday, M. (2003). On language and linguistics. MPG books Ltd.

Halliday, M. and Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Hameed, A. (2021). An ecolinguistic perspective on framing of animals in Quranic discourse. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 5(3), 113-124.

Haugen, E. (2001). The ecology of language. In A. Fill, & Peter. M. (Ed.), Ecolinguistic reader: Language, Ecology and Environment (pp. 57-66). Continuum.

Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. Stanford University Press.

Huang Guowen & Zhao Ruihua. (2017). On the origin, aims, principles and methodology of eco-discourse analysis. Modern Foreign Languages, 4, 585-596.

Love, G. (2003). Practical ecocriticism: literature, biology and the environment. University of Virginia Press.

Morozova, O & Pankevych, O. (2021). Regaining control over nature or learning to live in harmony with it: Media framing of environmental issues amidst the coronavirus pandemic. Communication Today, 12(2), 168–178.

Misiaszek, W. (2021). Ecopedagogical literacy of a pandemic: Teaching to critically read the politics of COVID-19 with environmental issues. The Journal of Environmental Education, 52(5), 358–369.

Mliless, M., Azzouzi, L., Saida, H., & Handoko, H. (2021). Laymen’s narratives in Amouddou’s eco-documentary: An ecolinguistic analysis. Jurnal Arbitrer, 8(2), 131–147.

Munir, S. (2018). An ecocritical reading of Taufiq Rafat’s selected poetry. Air University.

Niceforo, M. (2021). Conflicting discourses over plastic pollution: EC’s plastic strategy vs. the greenpeace plastic radar’s report. Lingue e Linguaggi, 46, 259–273.

Parini, J. (1993). Poems for a small planet: contemporary American nature poetry. Middlebury.

Rueckert, W. (1978). Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism. Environment & Society Portal (environmentandsociety.org) [Accessed Date:20.03.2021].

Schleppegrell, M. (2001). What Makes a Grammar Green. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment (pp. 227). Continuum.

Shakeel, R. (2015). Taufiq Rafat’s poetry—The kaleidoscope of various ‘isms’. International Journal of English and Literature, 5(4), 103-112.

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Stibbe, A. (2021a). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Stibbe, A. (2021b). Ecolinguistics as a transdisciplinary movement and a way of life. In B. Allison, & T. Warhol (Eds.), Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics (pp. 71–88). Mouton.

Tabassum, F. (2020). Taufiq Rafat as an Asian romantic: A critical analysis of poetry collection ‘Arrival of the Monsoon‘. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 1(4), 12-26.

Tahira, A. (2014). Facets of Romanticism in Taufeeq Rafat's poetry Arrival of Monsoon. BS Thesis. Govt.P.G.College (w) S/T.Gujranwala.

Wong, M. P., Khwaja, S., & Hassan, M. (2011). The English Language Poetry of South Asians: A Critical Study. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 14.

Zhang, R. (2022). The year’s work in ecolinguistics (2021). Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 141-163.

Zhdanava, A., Kaur, S. & Rajandran, K. (2021). Representing nonhuman animals as equals: An ecolinguistic analysis of vegan campaigns. Journal of World Languages, 7(1), 26–57.

Zuo, X. (2019). An ecological discourse analysis of the report of the 19th national congress of the communist party of China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(9), 1191-1197.