Students entering higher education are required to have higher order reading skills in order to succeed at the tertiary level. Comprehending complex texts requires them to possess certain strategies to compensate for any pitfalls of not grasping unfamiliar words or semantic structures especially in first-time read texts. The study, therefore, investigated the metacognitive reading strategy awareness of EFL Saudi students at the tertiary level in Saudi Arabia and its relationship with other variables such as year level and gender. A total of 355 students completed the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI-R) (Mokhtari et al., 2018). The data analysis delineated metacognitive awareness of EFL Saudi students of reading strategies and variations in awareness and use between different levels and genders. The most and least frequently used strategies among the students and correlation between different strategies and year and ability perception levels were also analysed. The findings indicated that the participants in this study had a medium level of awareness in all metacognitive reading strategies. The analysis also showed that the most frequently used strategy amongst Saudi students was problem-solving strategies (PSS) followed by support reading strategies (SRS) and the least frequently used strategy was global reading strategies (GRS). Awareness among students according to their perceived levels varied but only result of poor readers was statistically lower compared to other levels. Gender differences were all statistically insignificant across all subscales of reading strategies. The study concludes with a number of suggested pedagogical implications and future research recommendations.

Keywords: Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies; EFL Reading; Reading comprehension; Reading strategies

Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192

Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235-244.

Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2018). EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 297-308. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11220a

Al-Sobhani, Y. (2013). Metacognitive reading strategies use by Yemeni EFL undergraduate university students. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 4, 121-130.

Al Roomy, M., & Alhawsawi, S. (2019). Understanding reading strategies of EFL Saudi students. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 33-44.

Alkhaleefah, T. A. (2017). Saudi EFL learners’ reported reading problems and strategic processing of text types: A think-aloud case study. Reading Psychology, 38(7), 687-730. doi:10.1080/02702711.2017.1336660

Alluhaydan, H. (2019). Saudi ESL/EFL learners’ metacognitive online reading strategies in Arabic and English. (PhD), The University of Memphis, Tennessee.

Alrabah, S., & Wu, S.-h. (2019). A descriptive analysis of the metacognitive reading strategies employed by EFL college students in Kuwait. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 25-35.

Alshehri, M. (2014). Improving reading comprehension for Saudi students by using the reading aloud strategy. (Master Thesis), State University of New York at Fredonia, New York.

Alsheikh, N. O., & Mokhtari, K. (2011). An examination of the metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 151-160. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n2p151

Alsuhaibani, Z. (2019). The relationship between female EFL students' use of reading strategies and their reading self-efficacy. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 19(2), 373-393.

Baker, L., & Beall, L. C. (2014). Metacognitive processes and reading comprehension. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 397-412). Routledge.

Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (2001). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 229-243). Springer Netherlands.

Chevalier, T. M., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K. C., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). The role of metacognitive reading strategies, metacognitive study and learning strategies, and behavioral study and learning strategies in predicting academic success in students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities,

(1), 34-48. doi:10.1177/0022219415588850

Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1-11.

Daguay-James, H., & Bulusan, F. (2020). Metacognitive strategies on reading English texts of ESL freshmen: A sequential explanatory mixed design. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 20-30.

Daradkeh, A. A. (2020). The use of reading strategies in predicting reading comprehension: A case study of EFL university Saudi students. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(4), 121-133.

Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421-437. doi:10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026

Di Martino, V., & La Marca, A. (2019). Assessing metacomprehension and metacognitive reading strategies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(2), 38-48.

Education and Training Evaluation Commission (ETEC). (2020). Standardized Test For English Proficiency (STEP). https://etec.gov.sa/EN/PRODUCTSANDSERVICES/QIYAS/LINGUAL/ENGLISH/Pages/default.aspx

Endley, M. J. (2016). Proficiency as a variable in Gulf EFL students’ employment of reading strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 183–223.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10), 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Ganji, M., Yarahmadzehi, N., & Sasani, N. (2018). English major students’ awareness of metacognitive reading strategies: Gender and academic level in focus. Issues in Language Teaching, 7(2), 91-119. doi:10.22054/ilt.2019.46700.428

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 10(2), 486-489. doi:10.5812/ijem.3505

Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Paper presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, OH.

Goodman, K. S. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game In H. Singer & R. Rudell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497-508). International Reading Association.

Goodman, K. S. (2014). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In K. S. Goodman & Y. Goodman (Eds.), Making sense of learners making sense of written language: The selected works of Kenneth S. Goodman and Yetta M. Goodman (pp. 115-124). Routledge.

Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M. (2018). Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 15-38. doi:10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z

Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A learning-teaching view of second-language instruction: the learning strategies of second language learners with reading-grammar tasks. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation), Ohio State University, Colombus.

Ibrahim, M., Baharun, H., Harun, H., & Othman, N. (2017). Antecedents of intrinsic motivation, metacognition and their effects on students’ academic performance in fundamental knowledge for matriculation courses. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 211-246.

Karbalaei, A. (2011). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 16(28), 5-14.

Kazi, A., Moghal, S., & Asad, Z. (2020). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies for academic materials: A study of undergraduate students in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, 1, 44-51.

Mehrdad, A. G., Ahghar, M. R., & Ahghar, M. (2012). The effect of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies on EFL students’ reading comprehension across proficiency levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3757-3763. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.142

Mena, B., José, M., Alarcón, R., Arnau Gras, J., Bono Cabré, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29(4), 552-557.

Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129. doi:10.5539/elt.v9n3p117

Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219-246.

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2004). Investigating the strategic reading processes of first and second language readers in two different cultural contexts. System, 32(3), 379-394.

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of developmental education, 25(3), 2-11.

Mukhlif, Z., & Amir, Z. (2017). Investigating the metacognitive online reading strategies employed by Iraqi EFL undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8(1), 372-385. doi:10.24093/awej/vol8no1.26

O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35(1), 21-46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01013.x

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Allen & Unwin.

Rabadi, R. I., Al-Muhaissen, B., & Al-Bataineh, M. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies use by English and French foreign language learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages & Literature, 12(2), 243-262.

Salama, S. (2021, January 20 ). Saudi Arabia to teach English language from Grade One. Gulf News. https://gulfnews.com/world/gulf/saudi/saudi-arabia-to-teach-english-language-from-grade-one-1.76606508

Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 3-16). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Sheikh, I., Soomro, K. A., & Hussain, N. (2019). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, reading practices and academic attainments of university students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 126-137.

Shihab, I. A. (2011). Reading as critical thinking. Asian Social Science, 7(8), 209-218. doi:10.5539/ass.v7n8p209

Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Reading, 14(2), 314-336.

Teng, F. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54(1), 29-39. doi:10.1111/lit.12181

Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894-898. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909