Different languages have different means for structuring clauses which allow the coding of a thematically peripheral argument or adjunct as a core-object argument. The resulting constructions are known as double object or applicative constructions. The primary aim of this paper is to present a syntactic analysis of applicative constructions in Sudanese Arabic within the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program (Chomsky, 1993, 1995), in particular, the notion of phases, in combination with Pylkkänen's proposed phrase structure and the semantics of I-applicative (2000, 2008). The overall endeavor is to provide answers to the central questions: how applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are derived? Whether applicatives in Sudanese Arabic are I-applicatives or E-applicatives? The derivation of such constructions in Sudanese Arabic involves the coding of new argument in the argument structure of the verb. This new argument is introduced via a preposition and has a benefactive/goal interpretation. This argument is c-commanded by any internal argument. The applied argument is placed in the complement position of the head ApplI, and can undergo neither A-movement nor wh-movement. This makes Sudanese Arabic fit into the general syntactic typology of I-type applicative languages cross-linguistically and consequently promoting contrastive linguistics.

Keywords: Applied argument; applicative construction; minimalist program; spoken Sudanese Arabic; syntax

Adger, D. (2003). Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aldridge, E. (2015). A minimalist approach to the emergence of ergativity in Austronesian languages. Linguistics Vanguard. Vol. 1(1), 313-326.

Al Qumairi, S. (2017) A morphosyntactic analysis of the clause structure of the endangered Mehri language in Yemen. Doctoral dissertation. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Baker, M. (1988). Theta theory and the syntax of applicatives in Chichewa. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. Vol. 6(3), 353-389.

Bresnan, J. & Moshi, L. (1990). Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry. Vol. 21(2), 147-185.

Brown, J. D. (2009). Open response items in questionnaires. In Heigham, 1. & Croker, R. (eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: an introduction.(pp.200-219). Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.

Chang, Henry Y. (2015). Extractions in Tsou causative applicatives. Lingua Sinica. Vol. 1(5), 1-48.

Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale, & Keyser S (Ed.), The view from building. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In M. J. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (Current Studies in Linguistics) (pp. 1-54). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2005). On Phases. Manuscript. Cambridge: MIT Press..

Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In C. P. O. Robert Freidin, Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (Ed.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133-166). Cambridge The MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters.In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 1, 506-569. Berlin: Mouton de. Gruyter.

Culicover, P. W. (1997). Principles and Parameters: An Introduction to Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Culicover, P. W. (2009). Natural Language Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dickins, J. (2007). Khartoum Arabic. The encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics. Vol. 2, 559-571.

Harley, H. (2008). On the causative construction. Handbook of Japanese linguistics. 20-53.

Harley, H., Blanco, M. T. & Haugen, J. (2009). Applicative constructions and suppletive verbs in Hiaki. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics.

Jubilado, R. (2010). Clause structure of Malay in the minimalist program. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). National University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

Lomashvili, L. (2010). Morphosyntax of complex predicates in South Caucasian languages. Arizona: The University of Arizona.

Marantz, A. (1993). Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar (pp. 113-151). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

McGinnis, M. J. (1998a). Locality and inert case. In P. N. T. K. Kusumoto (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS (Vol. 28, pp. 267-281). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

McGinnis, M. J. (1998b). Locality in A-movement. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT.

McGinnis, M. J. (2001). Variation in the phase structure of applicatives. Linguistic Variation Yearbook. Vol. 1(1), 105-146.

McGinnis, M. J., & Gerdts, D. B. (2004). A phase-theoretic analysis of Kinyarwanda multiple applicatives. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 CLA Annual Conference.

Ouali, H. & Fortin, C. (2007). The Syntax of Complex Tense in Moroccan Arabic. In Elabbas Benmamoun (Eds.). Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIV. (pp.110-115). Netherland: John Benjamins Publisher.

Pesetsky, D. (1992). Zero Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Pylkkänen, L. (2000). What applicative heads apply to. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 7(1), 18.

Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing Arguments. MIT: MIT press.

Radford, A. (2004). English Syntax: An Introduction: Cambridge University Press.

Radford, A. (2009). An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of Grammar (pp. 281-337). Netherlands: Springer.

Siti Hamin Stapa & Mohd Mustafa Izahar. (2010). Analysis of errors in subject-verb agreement among Malaysian ESL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 16(1),1-18.

Ura, H. (1995). Multiple feature-checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting. (Ph.D Thesis ), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.

Utsumi, A. (2012). Applicative verbs and applicative construction in the Bantik language. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (JSEALS). Vol 5, 107-125.