Genre Analysis of Dissertation Acknowledgements: A Comparative Study Across Contexts

Wenhsien Yang

Abstract


Compared to its counterparts, i.e. China and Honk Kong, research on generic structures of acknowledgements in dissertations in Taiwan is understudied. To fill the gap, this study examined 120 MA and PhD dissertation acknowledgements written by Taiwanese Chinese-speaking writers in terms of generic structure and linguistic features in order to investigate whether differences exist within one single/similar culture, and to explore the possible causes of the differences. The results suggest that the authors generally followed the same three-tier structure of writing dissertation acknowledgements as their counterparts. However, contextual factors such as academic, socio-cultural or geographical differences among three settings also affected their construction of moves and choices of linguistic elements. It was found that the rhetorical language in our corpus was relatively direct, emotional, and definite. Moreover, a new step called ‘Making a Confession’, which was not reported in the other two settings, was identified in the study. Suggestions for further investigations and pedagogical implications are offered.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afful, J., & Mwinlaaru, I. (2010a). Commonality and individuality in academic writing: An analysis of conference paper titles of four scholars. English for Specific Purposes World, 27(1), 1-32.

Afful, J., & Mwinlaaru, I. (2010b). The construction of multiple identities in the acknowledgement section of a masters dissertation. English for Specific Purposes World, 30(9), 1-26.

Al-Ali, M. N. (2006). Conveying academic and social identity in graduate dissertation acknowledgments. Fifth International Conference of European Association of Language for Specific Purposes, Zaragoza, Spain, pp. 35-42.

Al-Ali, M. N. (2010). Generic Patterns and Socio-cultural Resources in Acknowledgements Accompanying Arabic PhD Dissertations. Pragmatics, 20(1), 1-26.

Atai, M.R., & Falah, S. (2005). A contrastive genre analysis of result and discussion sections of applied linguistic research articles written by native and non-native English speakers with respect to evaluated entities and ascribed values. Retrieved August 19, 2011, from

http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/PAAL10/pdfs/atai.pdf

Author. (2012). Comparison of gratitude across context variations: A generic analysis of dissertation acknowledgements written by Taiwanese authors in EFL and ESL contexts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 1(5), 125-141.

Author. (2013, in press). A genre analysis of PhD dissertation acknowledgements across disciplinary variations. LSP Journal (3)2.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.

Bloch, J. (2010). A concordance-based study of the use of reporting verbs as rhetorical devices in academic papers. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 219-244.

Brett. P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47-59.

Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introduction. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 57-75). London: Longman.

Chuang, W. H. (2009). The dialectical developments of marine cultures and Taiwanese marine cultures. I-Taiwan Study, 3. Retrieved 20 August, 2011, from www.cjcu.edu.tw/taiwan/a.doc

Dudley-Evans, T., & Henderson, W. (1990). The organisation of article introductions: Evidence of change in economics writing. In T. Dudley-Evans, & W. Henderson (Eds.), The Language of Economics: the analysis of economics discourse (ELT Documents 134) (pp.67-78). London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.

Flowerdew, J., & Dudley-Evans, T. (2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 463-489.

Giannoni, D. (2002). Words of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgement texts in English and Italian research articles. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1-31.

Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 293-317.

Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337.

Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(1), 113-122.

Hüttner, J. (2010). The potential of purpose-built corpora in the analysis of student academic writing in English. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 197-218.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Pearson.

Hyland, K. (2003). Dissertation Acknowledgements: The Anatomy of a Cinderella Genre. Written Communication, 20(3), 242-268.

Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: the generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 303-324.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). “I would like to thank my supervisor” Acknowledgements in graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 259-275.

Kaplan, R. B. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited. In C. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts (pp. 9-21). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Lasaky, F. (2011). A contrastive study of generic organisation of doctoral dissertation acknowledgements written by native and non-native (Iranian) students in applied linguistics. The Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 175-199.

Lee, S. (2002, June). Politeness and E-mail discourse: A study on the use of linguistic forms of politeness by Chinese learners of English. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference ‘Knowing and discourse: Speculating on disciplinary futures’. Hong Kong, SAR, China.

Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280-302.

Martin, P. M. (2003). A Genre Analysis of English and Spanish Research Paper Abstracts in Experimental Social Sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25-43.

Mkemleke, D. (2006). Nativisation of dissertation acknowledgements and private letters in Cameroon. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(2), 166-184.

Nodoushan, M., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of English Studies, 5(3), 111-132.

Römer, U., & Wulff, S. (2010). Applying corpus methods to written academic texts: Explorations of MICUSP. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 99-127.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text, 10(4), 365-384.

Samaraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.

Samaraj, B. (2005). An exploration of genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141-156.

Schlitz, S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Exploring corpus-informed approaches to writing research. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 91-98.

Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools (Version 5.0) [Computer Software]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual Patterns: Keywords and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Scrivener, L. (2009). An exploratory analysis of history students’ dissertation acknowledgements. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(3), 241-251.

Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions (Aston ESP Rep. No. 1). Birmingham: University of Aston.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, D. K. (1993). Arguing for experimental “facts” in science. Written Communication, 10(1), 106-128.

Williams, I. (1999). Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical. English for Specific Purposes,18(4), 347-366.

Ya, H. B. (2007, March). President Li, Tung-hui’s marine dispositions. Strait Comments (Hai-shai-ping-lun). 195. Retrieved 20 August, 2011, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/195-1282.html

Yang, R., & Alison, D. (2003). RAs in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-384.

Zhao, M., & Jiang, Y. (2010). Dissertation Acknowledgement: Generic Structure and Linguistic Features. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 94-109.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157