Generic Characterisation of Civil Engineering Research Article Abstracts
Abstract
English is increasingly used in advanced education. Among academic writing types, abstracts are one of the pivotal genres of communication among scholars from multiple disciplines. Nevertheless, non-English speaking scholars find the task of writing successful abstracts daunting and challenging. As a consequence, they might not be able to fully participate in their respective academia. To help these scholars disseminate their research findings, this study has the objectives of:1) identifying the structural organization commonly followed in civil engineering abstracts and (2) identifying a set of linguistic features commonly associated with a particular type of information presented in the abstracts. To accomplish these objectives, a data set of 60 English abstracts belonging to civil research articles systematically selected from the top journals in civil engineering was compiled and analyzed with reference to Swales’ genre analysis. The subsequent analysis reveals a typical pattern of how information presented in the abstracts is organized. Furthermore, each information type was linguistically characterized by a cluster of linguistic features that frequently co-exist. These findings captures what constitutes an appropriate academic style of writing in civil engineering abstracts. The study thus helps form a pedagogical model viable and useful for civil engineering scholars to develop strategies in response to the rigorous writing demands of academia. A better understanding of how research article abstracts are constructed can enhance not only their writing skills to conform to the expectations of the target discourse community, but also the chance of success in their respective fields.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Author. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes. Vol 24 (3), 269-292.
Author. (2007). Rhetorical organizations of research article introductions in biochemistry and microbiology. ESP Malaysia. Vol 13, 21-37.
Author. (in press). Structure of research article introductions in three engineering subdisciplines. The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
Biber, B. & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, C. & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation. Vol 62 (4), 428-446.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Gledhill, B. (2000). The discourse function of collocation in research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes. Vol 19 (2), 115-135.
Huckin, T. N. (2001). Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
Hu, G. W. & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol 43 (11), 2795-2809.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Pearson Educational Ltd.
Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes. Vol 24, 123-139.
Lin, L. & Evans, S. (in press). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes.
Love, A. (1993). Lexico-grammatical features of geology textbooks: Process and product revisited. English for Specific Purposes. Vol 12 (3), 197-218.
Martin, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes. Vol 22, 25-43.
McKenna, B. (1997). How engineers write: An empirical study of engineering report writing. Applied Linguistics. Vol 18, 189-211.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of a study of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies. Vol 10, 231-250.
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. Vol 24, 14-156.
Salager-Mayer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research and text type. Text. Vol 10 (4), 365-384.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1991). Medical English abstracts: How well structured are they? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol 42 (7), 528-531.
Santos, M. B. D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text. Vol 16, 481-499.
Šauperl, A., Klasinc, J., & Lužar, S. (2008). Components of abstracts: Logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol 59 (9), 1420-1432.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Swales, J. & Feak, C. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Michigan: the University of Michigan Press.
Ventola, E. (1997). Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. In C. Cmerjrkova, F. Danes & E. Havlova (Eds.), Writing vs. speaking: Language, text, discourse, communication (pp. 333-352). Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157